Burns ; complications ; Humans ; Shock ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Universal Precautions

Shock is one of the most common complications and one of the main causes of death after severe burns. The prevention and treatment of shock runs through the whole process of severe burn treatment. Shocks after severe burns, based on their causes, are mainly classified as follows: hypovolemic shock characterized by elevated hematocrit, also known as burn shock, and caused by serious leakage of intravascular fluid to body surface and interstitial spaces in the early stage of burns; hemorrhagic shock caused by large scale of incision and tension reduction, gastrointestinal stress ulcer, or large area of escharectomy and tangential excision surgery; septic shock caused by various microbial invasion; anaphylactic shock caused by infusion of drugs or blood. From the perspective of the reduction of effective circulating volume, burn shock and hemorrhagic shock are hypovolemic shocks, and septic shock and anaphylactic shock are vasodilatory shocks. As the aforementioned shocks vary in terms of occurrence timing, occurrence mechanism, and clinical manifestations, individualized strategies should be adopted for the prevention and treatment.
Burns/therapy* ; Humans ; Shock/prevention & control* ; Skin Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The benefit of early statin treatment following acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) has not been well studied. We sought to assess the effect of early statin therapy in patients with CS complicating acute MI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 553 statin-naive patients with acute MI and CS (Killip class IV) who underwent revascularization therapy between November 2005 and January 2008 at 51 hospitals in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received statins during hospitalization (n=280) and those who did not (n=273). The influence of statin treatment on a 12-month clinical outcome was examined using a matched-pairs analysis (n=200 in each group) based on the propensity for receiving statin therapy during hospitalization. RESULTS: Before adjustment, patients receiving statin, compared to those not receiving statin, had a more favorable clinical profile, were less likely to suffer procedural complications, and more likely to receive adequate medical therapy. Patients receiving statin had lower unadjusted in-hospital mortality and composite rate of mortality, MI, and repeat revascularization at 12 months, which remained significantly lower after adjustment for patient risk, procedural characteristics, and treatment propensity. CONCLUSION: In CS patients with acute MI undergoing revascularization therapy, early statin treatment initiated during hospitalization was associated with lower rates of in-hospital death and 12-month adverse cardiac events.
Angioplasty ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors ; Korea ; Myocardial Infarction ; Secondary Prevention ; Shock ; Shock, Cardiogenic

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The benefit of early statin treatment following acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) has not been well studied. We sought to assess the effect of early statin therapy in patients with CS complicating acute MI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 553 statin-naive patients with acute MI and CS (Killip class IV) who underwent revascularization therapy between November 2005 and January 2008 at 51 hospitals in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received statins during hospitalization (n=280) and those who did not (n=273). The influence of statin treatment on a 12-month clinical outcome was examined using a matched-pairs analysis (n=200 in each group) based on the propensity for receiving statin therapy during hospitalization. RESULTS: Before adjustment, patients receiving statin, compared to those not receiving statin, had a more favorable clinical profile, were less likely to suffer procedural complications, and more likely to receive adequate medical therapy. Patients receiving statin had lower unadjusted in-hospital mortality and composite rate of mortality, MI, and repeat revascularization at 12 months, which remained significantly lower after adjustment for patient risk, procedural characteristics, and treatment propensity. CONCLUSION: In CS patients with acute MI undergoing revascularization therapy, early statin treatment initiated during hospitalization was associated with lower rates of in-hospital death and 12-month adverse cardiac events.
Angioplasty ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors ; Korea ; Myocardial Infarction ; Secondary Prevention ; Shock ; Shock, Cardiogenic

Burns ; complications ; metabolism ; Humans ; Myocardium ; metabolism ; pathology ; Shock, Cardiogenic ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Time Factors

Based on the result of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis recently, the infusion of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) was not shown to over match routine crystalline solution in exerting resuscitation effect against hypovolemia of patients with burn shock, severe systematic infection, or other critical conditions, on the other hand, it may induce renal toxicity and other toxic and side effects. Since the pathological mechanism underlying hypovolemia during shock phase after burn is similar to that of severe systemic infection, we propose to suspend the use of HES for fluid resuscitation during the shock phase of severe burn until further elucidation.
Burns ; therapy ; Contraindications ; Fluid Therapy ; Humans ; Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives ; Hypovolemia ; prevention & control ; Resuscitation ; Shock ; therapy

Fluid resuscitation, hemostasis, and transfusion is essential in care of hemorrhagic shock. Although estimation of the residual blood volume is crucial, the standard measuring methods are impractical or unsafe. Vital signs, central venous or pulmonary artery pressures are inaccurate. We hypothesized that the residual blood volume for acute, non-ongoing hemorrhage was calculable using serial hematocrit measurements and the volume of isotonic solution infused. Blood volume is the sum of volumes of red blood cells and plasma. For acute, non-ongoing hemorrhage, red blood cell volume would not change. A certain portion of the isotonic fluid would increase plasma volume. Mathematically, we suggest that the residual blood volume after acute, non-ongoing hemorrhage might be calculated as 0·25N/[(Hct1/Hct2)-1], where Hct1 and Hct2 are the initial and subsequent hematocrits, respectively, and N is the volume of isotonic solution infused. In vivo validation and modification is needed before clinical application of this model.
Blood Volume ; Hematocrit ; Humans ; Isotonic Solutions/*therapeutic use ; *Models, Theoretical ; Shock, Hemorrhagic/*prevention & control/*therapy

Body Surface Area ; Burns ; complications ; therapy ; Humans ; Multiple Organ Failure ; prevention & control ; Shock, Traumatic ; etiology ; prevention & control ; Wound Infection ; prevention & control

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The safety and efficacy of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for Korean is unclear. We investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Korean patients undergoing ICD for primary or secondary prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1999 to December 2016, 396 cases (365 patients) of ICD implantation were performed: Baseline characteristics, procedural findings, and clinical outcome data were collected retrospectively from our ICD registry. The primary outcome was composite of cardiac death, appropriate shock or antitachycardia pacing. RESULTS: Among 365 patients, 91 patients (25.9%) had ICD for primary prevention and 274 patients (75.1%) were for secondary prevention (51.2±17.10 years, male was 80.8%). The median follow-up period was 3.1 years (interquartile range: 1.6–6.0 days). The most prevalent etiology was dilated cardiomyopathy (46.2%) in the primary prevention and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (24.4%) in the secondary prevention. The primary outcome was noted in 28.6% of the primary prevention and 33.2% of the secondary prevention (P=0.44). The rate of cardiac death was 2.2% in the primary prevention and 1.8% in the secondary prevention (P=1.00). The hospitalization due to heart failure was higher in the primary prevention compared with the secondary prevention (23.1% versus 13.5%, P=0.03). ICD therapy occurred in 134 patients (36.7%). Among them, 60 patients (44.8% of ICD therapy) experienced inappropriate shock. The most common cause of inappropriate shock was atrial fibrillation of flutter (AF/AFL). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy and safety of ICD in Korean is consistent with the data from Western countries.
Atrial Fibrillation ; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated ; Death ; Defibrillators, Implantable* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Failure ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Male ; Primary Prevention ; Retrospective Studies ; Secondary Prevention ; Shock ; Tachycardia, Ventricular ; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to describe clinical characteristics of patients with left ventriculars (LV) dysfunction and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and to evaluate the effect of ICD therapy on survival in Yeongnam province of Korea. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From a community-based device registry (9 centers, Yeongnam province, from November 1999 to September 2012), 146 patients with LV dysfunction and an ICD implanted for primary or secondary prophylaxis, were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups, based on the etiology (73 with ischemic cardiomyopathy and 73 with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy), and indication for the device implantation (36 for primary prevention and 110 for secondary prevention). The cumulative first shock rate, all cause death, and type and mode of death, were determined according to the etiology and indication. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the overall ICD shock rate was about 39.0%. ICD shock therapy was significantly more frequent in the secondary prevention group (46.4% vs. 16.7%, p=0.002). The cumulative probability of a first appropriate shock was higher in the secondary prevention group (p=0.015). There was no significant difference in the all-cause death, cardiac death, and mode of death between the groups according to the etiology and indication. CONCLUSION: Studies from this multicenter regional registry data shows that in both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, the ICD shock therapy rate was higher in the secondary prevention group than primary prevention group.
Cardiomyopathies ; Convulsive Therapy ; Death ; Defibrillators, Implantable* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Failure* ; Heart* ; Humans ; Korea* ; Mortality ; Primary Prevention ; Secondary Prevention ; Shock ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left