Objective:To investigate the effect of applying narrative therapy theory into game on improving the quality of bowel preparation in children, and to provide a basis for selecting nursing intervention methods before bowel preparation.Methods:This study was a quasi experimental study. Totally 62 children who took polyethylene glycol electrolyte dispersion for bowel preparation in Gansu Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January to December 2021 were included in this retrospective study. They were divided into control group with 28 cases and experimental group with 34 cases according to random number table method. The control group was given conventional bowel preparation and medication guidance, and the experimental group was given the intervention during bowel preparation by applying narrative therapy theory implanted games. The bowel preparation adequacy rate, complete medication taking rate and parental satisfaction of the two groups were observed and compared.Results:The bowel preparation adequacy rate and complete medication taking rate in the experimental group were 94.12% (32/34) and 52.94% (18/34), respectively, which were higher than 46.43% (13/28) and 10.71% (3/28) in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2 = 15.23, 10.41, both P<0.01). According to the average BBPS score, the experimental group had better intestinal cleanliness compared to the control group (7.65 ± 1.07 vs 6.07 ± 1.41, t = -4.87, P<0.01), the difference was statistically significant. 97.06% (33/34) of the parents in the experimental group expressed satisfaction, which was higher than 64.29% (18/28) in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 12.74, P<0.05). Conclusions:By applying the narrative therapy theory implanted games, the complete taking of high-dose bowel cleasing agent can be promoted and the quality of bowel preparation can be improved, which is worth suggesting as a nursing intervention method for bowel preparation.

Objective:To investigate the effect of low-dose ionizing radiation on blood cell parameters of radiation workers.Methods:A total of 124 staff members engaged in radiology were selected into the observation group, and they were divided into 4 subgroups of physicians, physicists, technicians, and maintainer according to their jobs. A total of 130 non-radiation-related staff members from the same hospital were selected into the control group. Blood cell parameters of peripheral blood of all subjects from 2016 to 2019 were collected, and the differences in blood cell parameters between the radiation group and the control group as well as 4 subgroups of the control group were analyzed and compared, and the correlation between the differences in blood cell parameters and the cumulative radiation dose was compared.Results:Compared with the control group, the white blood cell count, neutrophil count, red blood cell count and hemoglobin count in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05). There are no significant differences in cumulative radiation dose among different types of work (all P>0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the blood cell parameters of peripheral blood cells were not significantly correlated with the cumulative radiation dose. The blood cell count changes after 4-year low-dose ionizing radiation between the physicist group, the technician group and the maintainer sub-group were significantly different (all P<0.05), but the above differences were not related to the cumulative radiation dose (all P>0.05). Conclusions:Under the same exposure and protection conditions, the blood cell counts of different radiation-related workers are not significantly different, and the long-term cumulative radiation dose has no significant correlation with blood cell parameters. Therefore, peripheral blood cell parameters can no longer be used as a good indicator to reflect radiation damage, and it is urgent to find more convenient, intuitive and sensitive indicators of radiation damage.