1.Detection of Campylobacter jejuni by loop-mediated isothermal amplification method
Shirui QI ; Huan LI ; Jun CHEN ; Weishi LIN ; Xiangna ZHAO ; Xiao WEI ; Erna LI ; Boxing LI ; Yanyan MA ; Weiwei CHENG ; Jing LU ; Jing YUAN ; Gang SUN
Military Medical Sciences 2017;41(4):306-309,317
Objective To establish a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for detection of Campylobacter jejuni.Methods Six sets of primers were designed to recognize Campylobacter jejuni specific gene hipO.One was selected as the optimal primer and its specificity and sensitivity to Campylobacter jejuni were evaluated by LAMP reaction in 60 minutes at 62℃.Results The results recorded by the turbidity meter showed that the sensitivity of LAMP with a detection limit of 6.97×102 copies/μl was ten times that of PCR.Conclusion LAMP is a potential and valuable method of detection of Campylobacter jejuni due to its rapidity,simplicity,low cost and accuracy.It is especially suitable for grass-roots medical units.
2.Breast board combined with a thermoplastic head mask immobilization can improve the reproducibility of the treatment setup for breast cancer patients receiving whole breast and supraclavicular nodal region irradiation
Mingwei MA ; Shulian WANG ; Shirui QIN ; Minghui LI ; Jianghu ZHANG ; Yu TANG ; Shunan QI ; Siye CHEN ; Yuchao MA ; Xin LIU ; Yexiong LI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2019;28(3):217-221
Objective To quantify the setup errors measured with kV cone-beam CT (CBCT) using breast board with or without a thermoplastic head mask in breast cancer patients who received whole breast and supraclavicular nodal region irradiation.Clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) in 3 directions were also calculated.Methods The study included thirty patient receiving both whole breast and supraclavicular nodal region irradiation on Elekta Versa HD linear accelerators (Elekta Oncology Systems,Crawley,UK) between June 2016 and January 2018.The setup error data were retrospectively analyzed.All the patients were immobilized in the supine position on a breast board system (Carbon fibre breast board,Civco,Iowa,USA) with both arms raised.Twenty of the patients added an extra thermoplastic head mask to immobilize the neck.A CBCT scan was taken before treatment at the first 3 to 5 fractions and then once every week.Registration with the planning CT was performed and adjusted to match the target volume of the supraclavicular nodal region and the cervical vertebra by experienced medical staff,the position of the arms and the breast were also considered.For all patients the couch shifts in left-right (x),superior-inferior (y),anterior-posterior (z) were recorded.Statistical analysis included two-tails significance tests (t-Student and Manne-Whitney test for means,x2 test for variances).Population of the two groups was compared in terms of distribution of the mean shift (systematic error) and their standard deviations (random error).Van Herk's setup margin defined as MPTV =2.5Σ + 0.7δ was calculated in patients with or without mask immobilization.Results Altogether,56 images and 109 images were acquired in breast board only group and head mask group,respectively.Shifts of the breast board only group and the head mask group in x,y,z were 0.212±0.174 cm vs.0.272±0.242 cm (P=0.070);0.364±0.246 cm vs.0.242±0.171 cm (P=0.001);0.423±0.302 cm vs.0.364±0.269 cm (P=0.204).Proportion of the shift less than 5 mm in the breast board only group and the head mask group were 91.07% vs.85.32% (P=0.294);67.86% vs.89.91% (P=0.001);67.86% vs.74.31% (P=0.381).The CTV to PTV margin in x,y,z were 0.645 cm,0.981 cm,1.317 cm in breast board only group and 0.873 cm,0.709 cm,0.961 cm in head mask group,respectively.Setup error in the x direction was significantly correlated with BMI (P=0.001).Conclusions For the alignment and immobilization of patients who received whole breast and supraclavicular nodal region irradiation,using a breast board in combination of a thermoplastic head mask may significantly help to reduce the shift variance in superior-inferior direction compared to using breast board only.The anterior-posterior error is relatively large,other immobilization device or patient alignment methods are needed to be further explored to improve the accuracy.
3.Application and set-up error of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique for whole breast irradiation in left breast cancer
Siye CHEN ; Shulian WANG ; Yu TANG ; Yuan TIAN ; Shirui QIN ; Weijie CUI ; Jing JIN ; Yueping LIU ; Yongchun SONG ; Hui FANG ; Bo CHEN ; Shunan QI ; Jianghu ZHANG ; Guangyi SUN ; Yanbo DENG ; Yexiong LI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2018;27(5):504-508
Objective To analyze the correlation between treatment time and radiotherapy plan of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique for the whole breast irradiation (WBI) in the left breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery,verify the inter-fractional reproducibility of radiotherapy,observe the heart location and dosimetric changes and calculate the effect of DIBH upon the WBI setup error after the surgery.Methods We prospectively enrolled 15 patients with left breast cancer undergoing WBI after breast-conserving surgery,who met the requirement of D1BH.Treatment time was recorded,its correlation with the number of field and monitor unit was analyzed.Inter-fractional setup errors and PTV delineation were calculated using cone beam CT (CBCT).The accuracy of the position and dose of the heart during radiotherapy was verified by the imaging fusion of CBCT and CT images.The variables among groups were analyzed by non-parametric Firedman test.Results The average treatment time of DIBH radiotherapy was 4.6 minutes.The treatment time was correlated with the maximal and total number of sub-fields and total monitor units.During DIBH treatment,the mean cardiac displacement volume was 19.1 cm3(3.8%).The mean cardiac dose difference between CBCT and planning CT was 5.1 cGy,and there was no significant difference in the heart V5-V30.The mean inter-fractional system setup error (∑) and random setup error (σ) in the left-right (x),superior-inferior (y) and anterior-posterior (z) direction were ∑x 1.9 mm,∑y 2.1 mm,∑z 2.0 mm,σx 1.3 mm,σy 1.3 mm,σz 1.4 mm,respectively.The corresponding minimal margins for setup error were 5.7 mm,6.2 mm and 6.0 mm,respectively.Conclusion DIBH for WBI after breast-conserving surgery does not significantly prolong the treatment time.Treatment time is related to treatment plan.DIBH yields high inter-fractional reproducibility and protects the heart.
4.Preliminary study of clinical application of magnetic resonance linear accelerator in liver malignancies
Yuan ZONG ; Kuo MEN ; Shulian WANG ; Yuan TANG ; Hao JING ; Yuan TIAN ; Shirui QIN ; Yueping LIU ; Yongwen SONG ; Hui FANG ; Shunan QI ; Ningning LU ; Ning LI ; Zhuanbo YANG ; Bao WAN ; Yanxin ZHANG ; Yexiong LI ; Bo CHEN
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2022;31(1):1-7
Objective:To investigate the workflow, efficacy and safety of MR-Linac in liver malignancies.Methods:Clinical data of 15 patients with hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) or liver metastases treated with MR-Linac between November 2019 and July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The workflow of MR-Linac was investigated and image identification rate was analyzed. Patients were followed up for response and toxicity assessment.Results:Fifteen patients (6 HCC, 8 liver metastases from colorectal cancer, 1 liver metastasis from breast cancer) were enrolled. A total of 21 lesions were treated, consisting of 10 patients with single lesion, 4 patients with double lesions and 1 patient with triple lesions. The median tumor size was 2.4 cm (0.8-9.8 cm). The identification rate for gross tumor volume (GTV) in MR-Linac was 13/15. Although GTV of two patients were unclearly displayed in MR-Linac images, the presence of adjacent blood vessel and bile duct assisted the precise registration. All the patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). For HCC, the median fraction dose for GTV or planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) was 6 Gy (5-10 Gy) and the median number of fractions was 9(5-10). The median total dose was 52 Gy (50-54 Gy) and the median equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction (EQD 2Gy) at α/ β= 10 was 72 Gy (62.5-83.3 Gy). For liver metastases, the median fraction dose for GTV or PGTV was 5 Gy (5-10 Gy) and the median number of fractions was 10(5-10). The median total dose was 50 Gy (40-50 Gy) and the median EQD 2Gy at α/ β=5 was 71.4 Gy (71.4-107.1 Gy). At 1 month after SBRT, the in-field objective response rate (ORR) was 8/13 and the disease control rate was 13/13. At 3-6 months after SBRT, the in-filed ORR was increased to 6/6. During the median follow-up of 4.0 months (0.3-11.6), 4-month local progression-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival were 15/15, 11/15 and 15/15, respectively. Toxicities were mild and no grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed. Conclusions:MR-Linac provides a platform with high identification rates of liver lesions. Besides, the presence of adjacent blood vessel and bile duct also assists the precise registration. It is especially suitable for liver malignancies with promising local control and well tolerance.
5.Preliminary application of MR-Linac in breast cancer radiotherapy in a single academic center
Hao JING ; Yu TANG ; Yuan TIAN ; Ke ZHANG ; Shirui QIN ; Ying CAO ; Hui FANG ; Xuran ZHAO ; Bo CHEN ; Yongwen SONG ; Jing JIN ; Yueping LIU ; Shunan QI ; Yuan TANG ; Ningning LU ; Ning LI ; Shulian WANG ; Yexiong LI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2022;31(1):8-14
Objective:To describe a prospective study of pre-operative tumor-bed boost performed at the 1.5 T MR-Linac in combination with adjuvant whole breast irradiation, and a first case, with an accentuation on clinical feasibility and safety.Methods:A phase II, single arm study recruiting early stage patients follows a paradigm that first boosts the tumor bed and then undergoes breast conservative surgery in 2 weeks, and last irradiates the whole breast in 6 weeks. The primary endpoint is ≥ grade 2 acute breast toxicity. A 43 years old patient affected by a breast carcinoma, not special type of the right-sided lateral quadrant, staged cT 2N 0M 0, was planned and treated. The dose, 8 Gy for one time, was calculated by Monaco on CT simulation images. Both the air electron stream effect (ESE) and the electron return effect (ERE) at the presence of 1.5 T magnetic field were evaluated. During the pre-treatment evaluation, we carried out adaptation-to-position adjustment. Results:The normal organ dosimetry is within toleration. The Dmax to the skin, the chin and the right upper arm was 8.44 Gy, 28.5 cGy and 17.8 cGy, respectively. There was no increased toxicity from ERE and ESE, and the treatment was well tolerated without > grade 1 acute toxicity. The patient received breast conservative surgery on day 7 without delayed wound healing.Conclusions:This is the first case successfully treated within a clinical trial by pre-operative tumor-bed boost under 1.5 T MR-Linac in our institution. More participants are needed to validate and optimize the paradigm.
6.Comparison of the performance of two methods to determine set-up errors for DIBH patients with left sided breast cancer in radiotherapy
Tantan LI ; Jianghu ZHANG ; Yongwen SONG ; Yu TANG ; Shunan QI ; Fengyu LU ; Wei ZHANG ; Zengzhou WANG ; Xin FENG ; Shirui QIN ; Bin CHENG ; Bofei LIU ; Guishan FU ; Shulian WANG ; Jianrong DAI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2020;29(4):278-282
Objective:To establish the basic procedures of the application of optical surface monitoring system (OSMS) in the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy for patients with left sided breast cancer and compare the performance of OSMS and cone-beam CT (CBCT) in the determination of the set-up errors of DIBH radiotherapy for patients with left sided breast cancer.Methods:Twenty patients with left sided breast cancer received DIBH radiotherapy. Through the registration of CBCT images with the planning CT images, and the registration of OSMS radiography images with the outer contour of the body surface, translational set-up errors and rotational errors were determined along the lateral-medial ( Rx), superior-inferior ( Ry) and anterior-posterior ( Rz) directions. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of the set-up errors determined by two methods, and Bland- Altman plot analysis was used to assess the coincidence of these two methods. Results:Two methods were positively correlated. The Rz volume was 0.84, 0.74 and 0.84 in the x, y and z directions, and 0.65, 0.41 and 0.54 in the Rx, Ry and Rz directions, respectively (all P<0.01). The 95% CI of agreement were within preset 5 mm tolerance (-0.37-0.42cm, -0.39-0.41cm, -0.29-0.49cm ) in x, y and z directions for two methods. The 95% CI of agreement were within preset 3 ° tolerance -2.9°-1.4°, -2.6°-1.4°, -2.4°-2.5°in Rx, Ry and Rz directions for two methods. The system errors of 20 patients with left sided breast cancer receiving DIBH radiotherapy were <0.18cm and the random errors were <0.24cm. Conclusions:OSMS is equivalent to CBCT in the determination and stimulation of set-up errors for patients with left sided breast cancer receiving DIBH radiotherapy. The combination of CBCT and OSMS is a safe and reliable method.
7. Isocenter bilateral tangential fields combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for synchronous bilateral whole breast irradiation
Mingwei MA ; Shulian WANG ; Junjie MIAO ; Yu TANG ; Bo ZHAO ; Shirui QIN ; Jianghu ZHANG ; Shunan QI ; Siye CHEN ; Yuchao MA ; Xin LIU ; Yexiong LI
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology 2019;28(9):677-681
Objective:
To investigate the dose characteristics and outcomes of a single isocenter bilateral tangential fields (IBTF) combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in bilateral breast radiotherapy (BBR).
Methods:
Fourteen female patients with synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled in this study. All patients received BBR using IBTF combined with IMRT at a conventional (50 Gy/25f) or hypofractionated (43.5 Gy/15f) dose. For patients with invasive cancer, the additional tumor bed boost was given with sequential electron radiation or simultaneously photon IMRT. The coverage, uniformity and short-term clinical efficacy were evaluated.
Results:
The number of the irradiation field was 8-11, including 4-7 intensity-modulated fields. The bilateral breast PTV dose coverage reached 95% in all plans. For the tumor bed, the mean dose coverage was (95.54±1.33)%(left) and (94.19±1.03)%(right) using photon, and (90.25±8.79)%(left) and (85.28±8.35)%(right) using electron. The average V20 of bilateral lungs was (16.69±3.90)%. The cardiac Dmean was 5.48 Gy. Three patients presented with grade Ⅱ acute skin toxicities. No ≥ grade Ⅱ pneumonitis was observed. No recurrence occurred with the median follow-up time of 30.1 months. Eleven patients showed excellent cosmetic results.
Conclusion
BBR using IBTF combined with IMRT is efficacious and safe for patients with SBBC after BCS.