1.A Comparative Study of Topical Mitomycin C, Cyclosporine, and Bevacizumab after Primary Pterygium Surgery.
Shinyoung HWANG ; Sangkyung CHOI
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2015;29(6):375-381
PURPOSE: To compare the recurrence rates and complications associated with instillation of topical mitomycin C, cyclosporine, and bevacizumab after primary pterygium surgery. METHODS: Between July 2013 and June 2014, we performed surgery using the bare sclera method on 132 eyes (132 patients) with primary pterygium. We randomly selected 33 eyes (33 patients) and treated them with artificial tears four times a day for three months, 29 eyes (29 patients) were treated with topical 0.02% mitomycin C four times a day for five days, 34 eyes (34 patients) were treated with topical 0.05% cyclosporine four times a day for three months, and 36 eyes (36 patients) were treated with topical 2.5% bevacizumab four times a day for three months after surgery. We prospectively determined the recurrence rates of pterygium and complications at the six-month follow-up examination. RESULTS: At six months after surgery, the recurrence rates in each group were as follows: 45.5% (15 eyes) in the control group, 10.3% (three eyes) in the mitomycin C group, 20.6% (seven eyes) in the cyclosporine group, and 41.7% (15 eyes) in the bevacizumab group (p = 0.004). No serious complications, except subconjunctival hemorrhages, were observed in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Groups receiving topical 0.02% mitomycin C and 0.05% cyclosporine after surgery showed lower recurrence rates than the control group; however, no difference in recurrence rate was observed between the control group and the group receiving topical 2.5% bevacizumab after surgery.
Administration, Topical
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Alkylating Agents/administration & dosage
;
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage
;
Bevacizumab/*administration & dosage
;
Cell Count
;
Combined Modality Therapy
;
Cyclosporine/*administration & dosage
;
Double-Blind Method
;
Endothelium, Corneal/pathology
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Mitomycin/*administration & dosage
;
Ophthalmic Solutions
;
Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
;
Prospective Studies
;
Pterygium/diagnosis/*drug therapy/*surgery
;
Recurrence
;
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/antagonists & inhibitors
2.Vancomycin Resistance due to vanA Gene Expression in an Aerococcus viridans Isolate: First Case in Korea.
Kwangjin AHN ; Gyu Yel HWANG ; Young UH ; Kap Jun YOON ; Shinyoung HYUN
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2017;37(3):288-289
No abstract available.
Aerococcus*
;
Gene Expression*
;
Korea*
;
Vancomycin Resistance*
;
Vancomycin*
3.Effect of Cervical Cerclage on the Risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth after a Twin Spontaneous Preterm Birth
Shinyoung KIM ; Hyun Soo PARK ; Hayan KWON ; Hyun Joo SEOL ; Jin Gon BAE ; Ki Hoon AHN ; Sunghun NA ; Se Jin LEE ; Mi Young LEE ; Seung Mi LEE ; Dong Wook KWAK ; Jung Yoon PARK ; In Yang PARK ; Hye Sung WON ; Moon Young KIM ; Hyun Sun KO ; Han Sung HWANG ;
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(11):66-
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of cervical cerclage on the recurrence risk for preterm birth in singleton pregnant women after a twin spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included women who had a singleton pregnancy from January 2009 to December 2018 at 10 referral hospitals and a twin sPTB before the current pregnancy. We compared the cervical lengths during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, according to the placement of prophylactic or emergency cerclage. We evaluated the independent risk factors for sPTB (< 37 weeks of gestation) in a subsequent singleton pregnancy.RESULTS: For the index singleton pregnancy, preterm birth occurred in seven (11.1%) of 63 women. There was no significant difference in the cervical lengths during pregnancy in women with and without cerclage. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the placement of emergency cerclage was an independent risk factor for subsequent singleton preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 93.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.633–5,316.628; P = 0.027); however, the placement of prophylactic cerclage (OR, 19.264; 95% CI, 0.915–405.786; P = 0.057) was not a factor. None of the women who received prophylactic cerclage delivered before 35 weeks' gestation in the index singleton pregnancy.CONCLUSION: Cerclage did not lower the risk of preterm birth in a subsequent singleton pregnancy after a twin sPTB. However, emergency cerclage was an independent risk factor for preterm birth and there was no preterm birth before 35 weeks' gestation in the prophylactic cerclage group. Therefore, close monitoring of the cervical length and prophylactic cerclage might be considered in women who have experienced a twin sPTB at extreme gestation.
4.Effect of Cervical Cerclage on the Risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth after a Twin Spontaneous Preterm Birth
Shinyoung KIM ; Hyun Soo PARK ; Hayan KWON ; Hyun Joo SEOL ; Jin Gon BAE ; Ki Hoon AHN ; Sunghun NA ; Se Jin LEE ; Mi Young LEE ; Seung Mi LEE ; Dong Wook KWAK ; Jung Yoon PARK ; In Yang PARK ; Hye Sung WON ; Moon Young KIM ; Hyun Sun KO ; Han Sung HWANG ;
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2020;35(11):e66-
BACKGROUND:
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of cervical cerclage on the recurrence risk for preterm birth in singleton pregnant women after a twin spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).
METHODS:
This multicenter retrospective cohort study included women who had a singleton pregnancy from January 2009 to December 2018 at 10 referral hospitals and a twin sPTB before the current pregnancy. We compared the cervical lengths during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, according to the placement of prophylactic or emergency cerclage. We evaluated the independent risk factors for sPTB (< 37 weeks of gestation) in a subsequent singleton pregnancy.
RESULTS:
For the index singleton pregnancy, preterm birth occurred in seven (11.1%) of 63 women. There was no significant difference in the cervical lengths during pregnancy in women with and without cerclage. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the placement of emergency cerclage was an independent risk factor for subsequent singleton preterm birth (odds ratio [OR], 93.188; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.633–5,316.628; P = 0.027); however, the placement of prophylactic cerclage (OR, 19.264; 95% CI, 0.915–405.786; P = 0.057) was not a factor. None of the women who received prophylactic cerclage delivered before 35 weeks' gestation in the index singleton pregnancy.
CONCLUSION
Cerclage did not lower the risk of preterm birth in a subsequent singleton pregnancy after a twin sPTB. However, emergency cerclage was an independent risk factor for preterm birth and there was no preterm birth before 35 weeks' gestation in the prophylactic cerclage group. Therefore, close monitoring of the cervical length and prophylactic cerclage might be considered in women who have experienced a twin sPTB at extreme gestation.