5 years)from a basketball team before and after tapping,as well as every 10 minutes of playing.Exercise intensity is determined in accordance to 80% intensity(average of six matches) of China National Men Basketball Team performed at Beijing Olympic Games.Results Data show that ankle tapping restricts ankle ROM from the beginning of playing(P 0.05).Conclusion The protective effect of ankle taping is weakening with the prolongation of playing,and thus it's necessary to have a second taping at the halftime of the basketball game.

Objective: To evaluate the possibility of transverse sacroiliac screw placement in different segments of the sacrum. Methods: Data of 80 pelvic CT scans (slice thickness ≤1.0 mm) archived in CT department of the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from September 2016 to October 2017 were retrospectively collected. Mimics software was used to rebuild the pelvis three-dimensional model. According to whether the sacral 1(S₁) segment could place the transverse sacroiliac screws or not, all the sacrums were divided into normal group (n=55) and dysmorphic group (n=25). Simulation the S₁, sacral 2(S₂) transverse sacroiliac screw placement in 3-Matic software. Analysis whether there was any difference in maximum diameter and length of S₂ transverse sacroiliac screw between the normal group and the dysmorphic group. The pelvic CT data of the dysmorphic group were measured, and the optimal tilt angle and length of the oblique S₁ screw were obtained. The feasibility of transverse sacroiliac screw insertion in sacral 3(S₃) segment was evaluated.t-test, rank sum test, and χ² test was used to analyze data, respectively. Results: In the dysmorphic group, the largest diameter of the S₁ transverse screw was (4.9±1.6)mm, and the normal group was (13.6±3.6)mm (t=-15.07, P=0.00). In the dysmorphic group, the largest diameter of S₂ transverse screw was (13.8±3.0)mm, and was (12.4±2.2)mm in the normal group(t=2.11, P=0.04). There was no significant difference in the length of S₂ transverse sacroiliac screw between the two groups (t=0.47, P=0.64). In the dysmorphic group, the anterior vertebral height of S₁ was (23.1±4.0)mm, which was significantly higher than that of the normal group ((14.1±4.2)mm)(t=9.01, P=0.00). The angle of S₁S₂ in the dysmorphic group was 10.9°(3.8°, 17.6°), which was significantly larger than that of the normal group (2.0°(1.0°, 2.0°) (Z=-4.03, P=0.00). In the dysmorphic group, the incline angle of the oblique S₁ sacroiliac screw was (35.6±6.2)°, the anteversion angle was (37.2±4.4)°, and the mean screw length was (90.2±4.7)mm. In the dysmorphic group, the placement rate of S₃ transverse sacroiliac screw was 48.0%, and that of the normal sacral group was 9.1%. Conclusions There is often dysmorphic in the sacrum in patients with large S₁ anterior vertebral height and S₁S₂ angle. Sacral dysmorphic patients with posterior pelvic ring injury may be treated with S₁ pedicle oblique sacroiliac screws. S₃ transverse sacroiliac screws should be carefully placed, especially for the absence of sacral dysmorphic in patients.

Objective: To explore the clinical outcome an anatomic quadrilateral surface plate for both-column acetabular fractures through the Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach. Methods: A retrospective study of the patients with both-column acetabular fractures treated with an anatomic quadrilateral surface plate through the Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach from November 2015 to June 2017 was performed. Nineteen patients including 16 males and 3 females met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of included patients was 49.11 years (range, 25-68 years). There were 8 cases of fall injury, 7 cases of car accident injury and 4 cases of crushing injury. There were 11 cases of C1 type injury, 7 cases of C2 type, and 1 case of C3 type according to Tile classification. Patients included in this study were both-column acetabular fractures according to Letournel-Judet classification. There were six cases associated with posterior wall detachment. Minimally Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach was performed to manage the displaced fragments. First, the anteromedially displaced iliopubic fragment was managed with a reconstruction plate through iliac fossa approach. Then, the medially displaced ischiadic fragment could be fixed with an anatomic quadrilateral surface plate through the Stoppa approach. The reduction quality was assessed by postoperative radiographs and CT scans according to the criteria proposed by Matta. The function of hip joint was assessed by the Merle d'Aubigné-Posteal score modified by Matta. Results: The average operation time and blood loss were 115.26 min (range, 90-160 min) and 534.21 ml (range, 300-1000 ml), respectively. The mean length surgical incision was 18.82 cm (range, 16-20 cm). Average follow-up time was 19.84 months (range, 12-28 months). According to Matta criteria of reduction quality, anatomic reduction was obtained in 14 cases, and satisfactory reduction was gained in 3 cases, while unsatisfactory reduction was found in 2 cases (satisfactory rate=89.47%). All fractures healed well and mean healing time was 3.32 months (range, 3-5 months). The mean Merle d’Aubigné-Posteal score modified by Matta was 16.95 (range, 13-18), including 12 cases of excellent, 4 cases of good, and 3 cases of fair (satisfactory rate=84.21%). Intraoperative injury of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve developed in a case and obturator nerve damage occurred in another patient, respectively. Relevant symptoms were totally disappeared after two months’ conservative treatment (including neurotrophic therapy combined with adduction exercise of the affected thigh). Iliac fossa hematoma occurred in a case and relevant symptom was eliminated after puncture. Conclusion Satisfactory clinical outcome of both-column acetabular fractures could be obtained by the anatomic quadrilateral surface plate through the Stoppa combined with iliac fossa approach.

Objective:To investigate the effect of the placement of a drainage tube on the prognosis of patients with pelvic fractures treated by modified Stoppa approach.Methods:The medical records of patients with pelvic fractures treated with modified Stoppa approach from August 2012 to August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 43 patients including 32 males and 11 females (mean age 47.6 years, range from16 to 69) were included in the study. According to Young-Burgess classification, there were 12 cases of Lateral Compression type LC-I type; 20 cases of Anterior and Posterior Compression type APC-I type and 11 cases of APC-II type. All patients were treated with modified Stoppa approach to reduce the fracture and fix with plate and screw. According to whether a drainage tube was placed during the operation, 22 cases were placed with a drainage tube (drainage group), and 21 cases were not placed with a drainage tube (non-drainage group). The main observation indicators were the intraoperative conditions, antibiotic application, incision suture removal time, postoperative body temperature change, hospital stay and clinical function (Harris score).Results:Wound infection was not observed in two groups. The duration of antibiotic use in the drainage group was 5.0 d (2.0, 8.0) d, and the non-drainage group was 4.0 d (2.0, 5.0) d, the difference was not statistically significant ( Z=1.161, P=0.924). The hospital stays of the two groups were 18.5 d (15.0, 24.3) d and 19.0 d (13.0, 26.0) d, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( Z=0.542, P=0.591). The operation time was 150.2±52.4 min in the drainage group and 138.8±41.2 min in the non-drainage group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( t=0.791, P=0.433). The blood loss in the drainage group was 604.6±387.3 ml, and the non-drainage group was 581.0±275.0 ml. The difference was not statistically significant ( t=0.276, P=0.784). The postoperative body temperature changes of patients in the drainage group and non-drainage group were on day 1 (37.5±0.5 ℃ vs. 37.4±0.4 ℃, t=0.322, P>0.05), day 3 (37.1±0.4 ℃ vs. 37.0±0.4 ℃, t=0.286, P>0.05), day 5 (37.0± 0.3 ℃ vs. 36.8±0.2 ℃, t=2.127, P>0.05), on the 7th day (36.8±0.2 ℃ vs. 36.7±0.4 ℃, t=0.491, P>0.05), the difference was not statistically significant. The time for suture removal of surgical incision was 14.1±0.6 d in the drainage group and 13.9±0.6 d in the non-drainage group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( t=1.072, P=0.329). The Harris scores of the two groups were 96 (91, 100) points for the drainage group and 96 (93, 97) points for the non-drainage group, and the difference was not statistically significant ( Z=0.107, P=0.607). Conclusion:There is no significant influence of the application of drainage on recovery of wound or function for patients with pelvic surgery.