Objective To observe the serum concentration of S100βprotein (S100β)and neuron specific enolase (NSE)in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor resection with ulinastatin treat-ment.Methods Twenty-four patients with supratentorial tumor resection,aged 18-65 years,ASA Ⅰor Ⅱ,were randomly divided into the control group (group A,n =12)and ulinastatin group (group U,n =12).Patients in group U received ulinastatin (2 kU/kg)at the beginning of the surgery,with the continuous dose of 1 kU·kg-1 ·h-1 till the end of the operation.Group A received equivalent volume of saline solution as the vehicle control.Blood samples were taken from the artery and jugular venous bulb before induction of anesthesia (T1 ),skin incision (T2 ),1 h after dura openning (T3 ),at the closure of dura (T4 ),at the end of operation (T5 )and 24 h after operation (T6 )to analyze the concentration of S100β and NSE.The concentration of S100β and NSE were determined by ELISA. Results The concentration of serum S100β and NSE increased more significantly higher at T3-T6 in group A than group U (P <0.01).The concentration of serum S100βand NSE in group U were lower than those in group A at T3-T5 (P < 0.01 ).Conclusion Ulinastatin reduces the concentration of serum S100βand NSE during surgery,indicating it alleviates brain injury during supratentorial tumor resection.

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery in treatment of hepatic cystic echinococcosis.Methods The retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted.The clinical data of 40 patients with hepatic cystic echinococcosis who underwent 3D laparoscopic surgery in the Qinghai Province People's Hospital from March 2016 to July 2017 were collected.All the 40 patients were treated using 100 mg hydrocortisone on preventing intraoperative anaphylaxis.The experienced surgeons with proficiency in the laparoscopic technology in the same team finished surgery.Patients underwent respectively 3D laparoscopic excision of internal capsule in hepatic echinococcosis + residual cavity treatment,external capsule resection in hepatic echinococcosis and partial hepatectomy based on their conditions.Observation indicators:(1) intraoperative situations:operation completion,surgical procedures,operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion;(2) postoperative recovery situations:time to initial anal exsufflation,time for initial fluid diet intake,time for out-of-bed activity,time of indwelling drainage-tube,wound healing,postoperative complications and duration of postoperative hospital stay;(3) follow-up:number of patients with follow-up,follow-up time,oral anti-echinococcosis medical therapy during follow-up,hepatic echinococcosis recurrence and abdominal cavity implantation metastasis.Follow-up using outpatient examination and telephone interview was performed to detect the abdominal symptoms,oral anti-echinococcosis medicine,hepatic echinococcosis recurrence and metastasis up to September 2017.Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (x)± s.Measurement data with skewed distribution were described as M (range).Results (1) Intraoperative situations:all the 40 patients underwent successful laparoscopic surgery,including 17 undergoing excision of internal capsule in hepatic echinococcosis + residual cavity treatment,15 undergoing external capsule resection in hepatic echinococcosis and 8 undergoing partial hepatectomy.Two patients were combined with abdominal and pelvic hydatids and underwent 3D laparoscopic excision.Operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss of 40 patients were respectively (100 ± 28) minutes and (86± 24) mL,without intraoperative blood transfusion.(2) Postoperative recovery situations:time to initial anal exsufflation and time for initial fluid diet intake in 40 patients were (2.4± 1.8)hours and (1.7±0.9)days.Forty patients had out-of-bed activity on the day of surgery.Of 40 patients,abdominal drainage-tubes of 39 were placed for 2-3 days;abdominal drainage-tube of 1 with postoperative residual cavity-induced bile leakage was indwelled for 2 months and then was removed.Wound healing and duration of postoperative hospital stay in 40 patients were Class-A healing and (10.5 ± 2.1) days.During hospitalization,39 patients didn't have bleeding,bile leakage,anaphylactic shock,intestinal adhesion and obstruction;1 patient with postoperative residual cavity-induced bile leakage had indwelling drainage-tube removal at 2 months postoperatively.(3) Follow-up:all patients were followed up for 2-15 months,with a median time of 9 months.During the follow-up,40 patients were not complicated with discomforts and received oral antiechinococcosis medical therapy,without hepatic echinococcosis recurrence and abdominal cavity implantation metastasis.Conclusion The 3D laparoscopic surgery is safe and feasible in the treatment of hepatic cystic echinococcosis,and has an obvious advantage in the treatment of irregular hepatic cystic echinococcosis,with good short-term outcomes.

Objective To investigate whether the median(50%)effective effect-concentration(EC50)of propofol inducing loss of consciousness (LOC) varies. Methods 56 patients undergoing gastroscopy under general anaesthesia were enrolled on the study. Anaesthesia was conducted with a target-controlled infusion(TCI) of propofol. The initial target effect-site propofol concentration (Ceprop) was 5.00 μg/mL and was adjusted stepwise by 0.50μg/mL by an up-down sequential method to reach no-movement. Results Propofol EC50 to induce no-movement was higher in patients with anxiety than those without anxiety(6.46μg/mL vs. 5.75μg/mL,P<0.05). Conclusions During general anaesthesia ,patients with anxiety had a higher propofol EC50 for no-movement compared with those without anxiety. Differences in preoperative anxiety levels may reduce anaesthetic effects.

Objective To investigate the effect of preoperative anxiety on propofol EC50 for nomovement during Painless gastroscopy.Methods Thirty-one patients (without anxiety) and twenty-seven patients (with anxiety) undergoing gastroscopy under general anesthesia were enrolled on the study.Anesthesia was conducted with a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol.The initial target effect-site propo fol concentration (Ceprop) was 5.0 μg/ml and was adjusted stepwise by 0.5 μg/ml by an up-down sequential method to reach no-movement.Results Propofol EC50 to induce no-movement was higher in patients with anxiety than those without anxiety (5.32 μg/ml,95％ CI:4.75-5.88 μg/ml vs 4.75 μg/ml,95％ CI:4.48-5.01 μg/ml,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions During painless gastroscopy,patients with anxiety had a higher propofol EC50 for no-movement compared with those without anxiety when intravenous injected of fentanyl 0.1 μg/kg.

Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of different doses of apatinib combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the adverse reactions.Methods:A total of 69 patients with NSCLC diagnosed in the No. 901 Hospital of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army Joint Logistics Support Force were selected from January 2018 to June 2020, and were divided into chemotherapy alone group (docetaxel+ cisplatin was used), apatinib group A [apatinib (0.25 g)+ docetaxel+ cisplatin was used] and apatinib group B [apatinib (0.50 g)+ docetaxel+ cisplatin was used] according to random number table method, with 23 cases in each group. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), and incidences of adverse reactions were compared between the three groups of patients.Results:One patients in the apatinib group B withdrew from the study due to acute myocardial infarction. After 4 cycless of treatment, the ORR of the patients in the chemotherapy alone group, apatinib group A and apatinib group B were 17.39% (4/23), 47.83% (11/23) and 54.55% (12/22) respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=7.41, P=0.024). The ORR of the apatinib group B was higher than that of the chemotherapy alone group, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=6.77, P=0.009). There were no statistically significant differences in ORR between the apatinib group A and chemotherapy alone group, the apatinib group A and apatinib group B ( χ2=4.85, P=0.028; χ2=0.20, P=0.652). The DCR of the patients in the three groups were 47.83% (11/23), 78.26% (18/23) and 86.36% (19/22) respectively, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=9.03, P=0.011). The DCR of the apatinib group B was higher than that of the chemotherapy alone group, with a statistically significant difference ( χ2=7.52, P=0.006). There were no statistically significant differences in DCR between the apatinib group A and the chemotherapy alone group, the apatinib group A and apatinib group B ( χ2=4.57, P=0.033; χ2=0.51, P=0.477). The median OS of the patients in the three groups were 6.8, 9.2 and 9.9 months respectively, with a statistically significant different ( χ2=8.91, P=0.022). Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the median OS of the apatinib group A and apatinib group B were significantly prolonged, with statistically significant differences ( χ2=7.25, P=0.036; χ2=8.60, P=0.029). Compared with the apatinib group A, the median OS of the apatinib group B was prolonged, but there was no statistically significant different ( χ2=1.54, P=0.201). The median PFS of the patients in the three groups were 5.2, 7.7 and 8.2 months respectively, with a statistically significant different ( χ2=8.79, P=0.026). Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the median PFS of the apatinib group A and apatinib group B were significantly prolonged, with statistically significant differences ( χ2=7.01, P=0.039; χ2=8.36, P=0.031). Compared with the apatinib A group, the median PFS of the apatinib group B was prolonged, but there was no statistically significant different ( χ2=1.68, P=0.186). There were statistically significant differences in the incidences of fatigue [34.78% (8/23) vs. 65.22% (15/23) vs. 72.73% (16/22), χ2=7.50, P=0.024], hypertension [4.35% (1/23) vs. 34.78% (8/23) vs. 68.18% (15/22), χ2=20.07, P<0.001], hand-foot syndrome [4.35% (1/23) vs. 43.48% (10/23) vs. 72.73% (16/22), χ2=22.28, P<0.001] and oral mucositis [8.70% (2/23) vs. 39.13% (9/23) vs. 72.73% (16/22), χ2=19.26, P<0.001] among the three groups. Compared with the chemotherapy alone group, the incidences of hypertension and hand-foot syndrome in the apatinib group A and the incidences of fatigue, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome and oral mucositis in the apatinib group B were increased, with statistically significant differences ( χ2=6.77, P=0.009; χ2=9.68, P=0.002; χ2=6.51, P=0.011; χ2=20.00, P<0.001; χ2=22.37, P<0.001; χ2=19.21, P<0.001). Conclusion:Apatinib (0.50 g) combined with chemotherapy has better short-term efficacy than chemotherapy alone in advanced NSCLC. Apatinib (0.25 g) and apatinib (0.50 g) can prolong the survival of patients, but increasing the treatment dose can not achieve longer survival benefit.

[摘 要] 目的：探讨贝伐珠单抗联合多柔比星脂质体治疗铂类耐药复发性卵巢上皮性癌患者的近期疗效和不良反应，并随访生存情况。方法：选取中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九〇一医院2018年1月至2019年12月收治的76例铂类耐药复发性卵巢上皮性癌患者，采用数字随机分组法分为对照组38例、观察组38例，对照组给予多柔比星脂质体单药化疗4个周期，观察组给予贝伐珠单抗联合多柔比星脂质体化疗4个周期，观察两组患者治疗后近期疗效和不良反应，以及血清肿瘤标志物人附睾蛋白4（human epididymis protein 4，HE4）、糖类抗原125（carbohydrate antigen 125，CA125）变化，并随访总生存期（OS）和无疾病进展生存期（PFS）。结果：对照组患者客观有效率（ORR）为40.54%、疾病控制率（DCR）为67.57%，观察组患者ORR为69.44%、DCR为88.89%，观察组ORR和DCR显著高于对照组（均P<0.05）。治疗后观察组患者血清HE4和CA125分别为（142.67±46.81）pmol/L、（31.79±11.65）U/L，显著低于对照组患者的（219.33±75.67）pmol/L、（57.05±17.85）U/L（均P<0.05）。两组患者的胃肠反应、骨髓抑制、肝肾功能损伤、心脏毒性、过敏反应、血栓栓塞和出血等不良反应相比较差异无统计学意义（均P>0.05）；观察组患者高血压发生率显著高于对照组（P<0.05），但可控、可耐受。观察组患者中位OS 和中位PFS分别分别为17.2个月和10.9个月，显著长于对照组患者的14.1个月和7.8个月（均P<0.05）。结论：对于铂类耐药复发性卵巢上皮性癌患者，贝伐珠单抗联合多柔比星脂质体近期疗效可靠、安全性好、不良反应可耐受，值得临床推广。

Objective: : To observe the short-term efficacy and toxicity of apatinib monotherapy as well as docetaxel plus cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer. Method: : According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 108 patients with advanced gastric cancer in the 105th Hospital of PLA were selected. According to random table grouping method, there were 54 cases in group A and 54 cases in group B. Patients in group A received continuous oral administration of apatinib alone, while group B received docetaxel plus cisplatin chemotherapy, with 3 weeks as a cycle and 4 cycles for a course. The efficacy and side effects were evaluated 3 months later. Results: : In groupA, there were 4 cases of CR, 25 cases of PR, 18 cases of SD and 7 cases of PD; the ORR was 53.7% and DCR was 87%. In group B, there were 2 cases of CR, 19 cases of PR, 21 cases of SD and 12 cases of PD; the ORR was 38.9% and DCR was 77.8%. The ORR and DCR in group A were significantly better than those in group B (P<0.05). The main adverse reactions were gastrointestinal reaction, myelosuppression, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, all of which were grade 1 to 2; The incidence of bone marrow suppression and gastrointestinal reaction in group A was lower than that in group B (P<0.05), while the incidence of hand-foot syndrome and hypertension in group B was lower than that in group A (P<0.01). Conclusion： ：The short-term efficacy of targeted therapy of apatinib alone was better than that of docetaxel combined with cisplatin chemotherapy, and the toxicity and side effects of both regimens were controllable;Apatinib can be used as the primary regimen for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.