1.Effectiveness of en-masse retraction using midpalatal miniscrews and a modified transpalatal arch: Treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes.
Jungkil LEE ; Ken MIYAZAWA ; Masako TABUCHI ; Takuma SATO ; Misuzu KAWAGUCHI ; Shigemi GOTO
The Korean Journal of Orthodontics 2014;44(2):88-95
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment duration and dentoskeletal changes between two different anchorage systems used to treat maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion and to examine the effectiveness of en-masse retraction using two miniscrews placed in the midpalatal suture. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients (9 men, 48 women), who had undergone level anchorage system treatment at Aichi-Gakuin University Dental Hospital (Nagoya, Japan) were divided into two groups according to the method of maxillary posterior anchorage reinforcement: midpalatal miniscrews (25 patients, mean age 22 years) and conventional anchorage (32 patients, mean age 19 years). The en-masse retraction period, overall treatment duration, pre-treatment effective ANB angle, and change in the effective ANB angle were compared with an independent-samples t-test. RESULTS: Compared to the headgear group, the duration of en-masse retraction was longer by approximately 4 months in the miniscrew group (p < 0.001). However, we found no significant difference in the total treatment duration between the groups. Moreover, a greater change in the effective ANB angle was observed in patients treated with miniscrews than in those treated with the conventional method (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The level anchorage system treatment using miniscrews placed in the midpalatal area will allow orthodontists more time to control the anterior teeth during en-masse retraction, without increasing the total treatment duration. Furthermore, it achieves better dentoskeletal control than does the conventional anchorage method, thereby improving the quality of the treatment results.
Humans
;
Male
;
Sutures
;
Tooth
2.Trends in the Number and Multiplicity of Blood Culture Submissions in Hospitals in the Minami-Ibaraki Area of Japan
Hanako Osuka ; Shigemi Hitomi ; Tsuyoshi Oishi ; Kazunori Miyamoto ; Tsukasa Kondo ; Teruo Urata ; Eiichi Yabata ; Haruyuki Takei ; Yasunori Funayama ; Miki Goto ; Hiroshi Koganemaru
General Medicine 2014;15(1):29-33
Background: Blood culture is an essential examination for diagnosis of causative microorganisms and determination of optimal antimicrobials in serious cases of infectious diseases. We examined temporal trends in the number and multiplicities of blood culture submission, two pre-analytic parameters indicating quality of the examination, in the Minami Ibaraki Area.
Methods: We reviewed all computerized and available paper-based laboratory records of microbiological examination in five hospitals in the area between 2002 and 2011.
Results: Blood culture submissions, estimated to be 2.4–7.3 (median: 5.1) sets per hospital bed, 8.6–23 (17) per 1,000 inpatient-days, and 0.13–0.41 (0.25) per newly admission in 2011, almost constantly increased during the study period in all hospitals. Proportions of blood specimens to all materials for microbiological cultures also increased up to 15–30% (20%) in 2011. In contrast, it was not until the latter half of the study period that solitary submission, accounting for 26–56% (35%) in 2011, decreased. Positive blood cultures were between 11 and 28% through the study period. Coagulase-negative staphylococci accounted for approximately one fourth of recovered organisms in 2006 and 2011.
Conclusion: Frequency and multiplicity of blood culture submission markedly increased in hospitals in the Minami-Ibaraki Area of Japan.