Objective To evaluate the prognostic factors of brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer and suggest a individualized treatment method proposal with prognostic estimation. Methods From Dec. 2003 to Jan.2007, 183 patients received whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival. Logrank test was used to evaluate the difference between the groups. Multivariate survival analysis was conducted using a Cox proportional hazard regression model with a backward stepwise procedure. Results The overall l-, 2- and 3-year survival rate was 40.6%, 16.6% and 11.3%, respectively, but with a median survival time of 10.0 months (95% CI 8.6-11.4 months). In multivariate analysis, RAP grouping, weight loss, LDH in blood serum and treatment method were independent prognostic factors. The median survival time of WBRT alone, WBRT with chemotherapy, surgery with chemoradiotherapy and WBRT with Gefitinib was 9.0, 9.0, 22.0 and 13.0 months, respectively, but their difference were statistical significant (X2 = 10.37, P = 0.016). Conclusions The main prognostic factors of brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer are RAP grouping, weight loss, LDH in blood serum and treatment method. The survival time is prolonged by proper multidiseiplinary management than WBRT alone. The effect of combined treatment of surgery with chemoradiotherapy is favorable for the patients operated with single region of metastasis.

Objective To apply Nutritional Risk Screening-2002(NRS-2002) to perform primary screening for nutritional risk in patients with esophageal cancer who undergo radiotherapy, and assess their nutritional status, and to investigate the value of NRS-2002 in such patients.Methods A total of 97 patients who were diagnosed with esophageal cancer and underwent radiotherapy in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2010 to April 2014 were analyzed retrospectively.The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to analyze the difference in survival, and the chi-square test and the Pearson correlation analysis were applied to analyze the correlation between NRS-2002 score and blood parameters.Results Of all patients, 26.8%had nutritional risk before radiotherapy, which gradually increased with the progress of radiotherapy.The 1-year overall survival rates of the patients with NRS-2002scores of ≤3 and ≥4 on admission were 91.1%and 61.9%, respectively (P=0.010).As for the patients with the highest NRS-2002 scores of ≤2 and ≥3 during treatment, the 1-year overall survival rates were 94.2% and 77.5%, respectively (P=0.012).As for the patients with the lowest NRS-2002 scores of ≤3 and ≥4 during treatment, the 1-year overall survival rates were 91.3% and 54.5%, respectively ( P=0.018).The NRS-2002 score was correlated with prealbumin on admission and at week 1 of radiotherapy (P=0.000 and 0.002), and the NRS-2002 score was correlated with albumin at week 3 of radiotherapy (P=0.036).The multivariate analysis showed that the TNM stage of esophageal cancer and the highest NRS-2002 score during treatment were the independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer (P=0.001 and 0.005).Conclusions The patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy have high nutritional risk, and NRS-2002 score is the independent prognostic factor in these patients and can be used as a tool for primary screening for nutritional risk.

ObjectiveTo avoid stress responses in experimental monkeys caused by direct capture, and to improve the adaptability and experimental efficiency of marmosets in behavioral, two-photon imaging, and electrophysiological experiments, a device for immobilizing marmosets without the need for capture is developed. MethodsA set of compatible transport cage and monkey chair was produced through 3D graphic design and printing. First, the transport cage was aligned with the feeding outlet of the experimental housing cage, and the marmoset was gently guided into the transport cage. Then, the transport cage was connected to the monkey chair, and the marmoset was gently guided into the chair for immobilization. Subsequent experiments were carried out afterward. The effectiveness was evaluated by observing the efficiency of transport and immobilization, the marmoset cooperation level, and stress responses. ResultsAfter testing and improvements, the device successfully completed immobilization of marmosets without the need for capture, significantly improving the fluency and efficiency of the experiment. As the number of operations increased, the marmosets became more cooperative, and the operation speed was significantly enhanced. After using the device, the stress responses were noticeably reduced, with marmosets showing lower stress levels. In particular, compared to traditional capture methods, the use of this device significantly reduced marmoset anxiety and discomfort, increasing their cooperation levels during the experiment. ConclusionThe monkey chair device designed allows for restraint of marmosets without the need for capture, ensuring smooth progress of subsequent experiments while also safeguarding animal welfare. This device is easy to operate, highly practical, cost-effective, and has great potential for widespread application.