Objective:To observe the influence of multi-disciplinary cooperation and optimization management mode on the negative situation and rehabilitation effect of patients with affective disorder after coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease.Methods:A total of 188 patients with emotional disorders caused by coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease from January 2017 to December 2018 to our hospital were selected. According to the random number method, 94 cases in the control group adopted the conventional management model, and 94 cases in the experimental group adopted the multidisciplinary collaborative optimization management model. The negative emotions [evaluated by Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS) ] scores before and after management, the coping style (Jalowies) scores, and quality of life [evaluated by World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) ] scores were compared between the two groups. The clinical rehabilitation effect and satisfaction rate of related management between the two groups were compared.Results:There were no significant differences between the two groups before management of SAS scores, SDS scores, Jalowies scores, and WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scores ( P> 0.05). After management, the SAS scores and SDS scores of the two groups were significantly reduced, and the Jalowies scores and WHOQOL-BREF quality of life scores were significantly increased. After management, the SAS score and SDS score of the experimental group were 47.32±5.68, 49.93±6.49 and 54.95±6.59, 55.33±8.30 in the control group, the difference was significant between two groups ( t value was 8.503, 4.969, P<0.01). The Jalowies scores and WHOQOL-BREF scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group ( t value was -27.662--4.290, P<0.01). The total effective rate of rehabilitation in the experimental group was 98.94%(93/94), which was significantly higher than 90.43%(85/94) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 value was 6.760, P <0.05). The total satisfaction rate of the experimental group for management intervention was 100.00%(94/94), which was significantly higher than the total satisfaction rate of the control group, 91.49%(86/94), the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 value was 6.397, P <0.05). Conclusions:In the patients with affective disorder caused by coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, multi-disciplinary cooperation and optimization management mode can significantly reduce the negative emotions of patients after management, improve the way of patients to deal with the disease, effectively improve the clinical rehabilitation effect and the quality of life of patients, improve the satisfaction rate of patients with management, shorten the distance between nurses and patients, and achieve ideal results.

To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of percutaneous stent implantation for treating left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis. Methods Consecutive patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease treated by stent-based percutaneous intervention (PCI) at 6 medical centers in China were enrolled. Procedural data and clinical outcomes were obtained from all patients. Results From January 2001 to December 2004, 138 patients (79 males and 59 females; mean age: 69.7±5.8 years)underwent PCI for LMCA stenosis. Bare metal stents (BMS) were implanted in 51 patients with non-bifurcational lesions and in 5 patients with bifurcational lesions from January of 2001 to June of 2003 (BMS group);. Drug eluting stents (DES) were used unselectively to cover both bifurcational and non-bifurcational lesions in 86 patients from July of 2003 to December of 2004 (DES group). Procedural success rate of the 138 cases was 98% (135/138). One patient (0.7%) with bifurcation lesion who was treated with DES died from severe heart failure 2 weeks after the procedure. During a mean follow up period of 21.3 ± 5.6 months, one patient died from renal failure, one from sudden cardiac death, 4 underwent target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the BMS group, which all occurred in patients with bifurcational lesions; whereas in the DES group no deaths occurred and only one patient with bifurcational lesion had TLR. Conclusions (1) PCI is feasible and relatively safe to treat unprotected left main coronary artery disease in elderly patients at medical centers with experienced professionals. (2) BMS and DES have similar immediate and long-term efficacy in the treatment of ostium and shaft lesions of the LMCA. (3) DES are strongly suggested in the therapy of distal bifurcation lesion of unprotected LMCA.