Background and Objectives: The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional and multidisciplinary evaluation and management process to identify and address the needs of an older person (OP). However, there are several challenges faced in its implementation which limit its full potential and utility to promote healthy aging. This paper aimed to describe the issues and challenges of those involved in the conduct of the traditional paper-based CGA, specifically older persons and the research and health facility-based assessors. Methods: This is a descriptive convergent parallel mixed-methods study utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data from the UP Manila Wellness Initiative for Seniors and Elders research program. Mixed methods of data collection were conducted online, namely survey and focus group discussions (FGD). Purposively recruited OPs aged 60 years and above who previously underwent CGA served as online survey respondents. Similarly, purposively recruited healthcare professionals (HCP) who conduct research-based and facility-based CGA participated in the FGDs. STATA and NVivo PRO Plus were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used namely frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation, and median. Guided by the interpretivist paradigm, thematic analysis was conducted. Triangulation of results was done by the multidisciplinary team. Results: A total of 30 OPs with mean age of 67.1 years (SD±5.7) responded to the online survey. A total of 10 healthcare professionals, mostly geriatricians, participated in two separate FGDs. : Most (83%) liked the comprehesiveness of the CGA. However, OPs had difficulties with the following: follow-ups (43%), sensitive questions (40%), and recall (23%). Thirty percent (30%) rated the CGA as long to too long. HCP assessors’ challenges were related to the participants/patients, assessors, and operational factors. Participant/ patient-related factors include health conditions, follow-up issues, language, sensory impairment, and familiarity with the tools. Assessors-related factors include competency, missing information, illegible handwriting, and asking sensitive questions. Operations-related factors include the length of the questionnaire and process, physical set up, fragmented system, data storage and protection, and inadequate human resource. Conclusion The common issues and challenges identified by the older persons and healthcare professional assessors in the conduct of paper-based CGA include the length of the CGA, sensitive questions, and follow-up issues. Addressing these issues and challenges is necessary to maximize the utility of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in promoting healthy aging. With the advent of technology, digitizing the paper-based CGA is a promising approach to address these challenges.
geriatric assessment ; Philippines

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional and multidisciplinary evaluation and management process to identify and address the needs of an older person (OP). However, there are several challenges faced in its implementation which limit its full potential and utility to promote healthy aging. This paper aimed to describe the issues and challenges of those involved in the conduct of the traditional paper-based CGA, specifically older persons and the research and health facility-based assessors.

METHODS

This is a descriptive convergent parallel mixed-methods study utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data from the UP Manila Wellness Initiative for Seniors and Elders research program. Mixed methods of data collection were conducted online, namely survey and focus group discussions (FGD). Purposively recruited OPs aged 60 years and above who previously underwent CGA served as online survey respondents. Similarly, purposively recruited healthcare professionals (HCP) who conduct research-based and facility-based CGA participated in the FGDs. STATA and NVivo PRO Plus were used to analyze the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Descriptive statistics were used namely frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation, and median. Guided by the interpretivist paradigm, thematic analysis was conducted. Triangulation of results was done by the multidisciplinary team.

RESULTS

A total of 30 OPs with mean age of 67.1 years (SD±5.7) responded to the online survey. A total of 10 healthcare professionals, mostly geriatricians, participated in two separate FGDs.

 

Most (83%) liked the comprehesiveness of the CGA. However, OPs had difficulties with the following: follow-ups (43%), sensitive questions (40%), and recall (23%). Thirty percent (30%) rated the CGA as long to too long. HCP assessors’ challenges were related to the participants/patients, assessors, and operational factors. Participant/ patient-related factors include health conditions, follow-up issues, language, sensory impairment, and familiarity with the tools. Assessors-related factors include competency, missing information, illegible handwriting, and asking sensitive questions. Operations-related factors include the length of the questionnaire and process, physical set up, fragmented system, data storage and protection, and inadequate human resource.

CONCLUSION

The common issues and challenges identified by the older persons and healthcare professional assessors in the conduct of paper-based CGA include the length of the CGA, sensitive questions, and follow-up issues. Addressing these issues and challenges is necessary to maximize the utility of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in promoting healthy aging. With the advent of technology, digitizing the paper-based CGA is a promising approach to address these challenges.

Geriatric Assessment ; Philippines