BACKGROUND: Parafibromin is a product of the tumor suppressor gene that has been studied as a potential indicator of tumor aggressiveness in the parathyroid, breast, colorectum, and stomach. However, the clinical significance and potential function of parafibromin expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas remain largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of parafibromin in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and to verify its potential as a biomarker of tumor behavior. METHODS: Parafibromin expression was evaluated in 30 cases of LSCC using immunohistochemistry. The correlations between parafibromin expression and clinicopathologic parameters were investigated. RESULTS: Parafibromin expression was positive in 15 cases (50%) and negative in 15 cases (50%). Tumor size and T stage showed a statistically significant inverse relationship with parafibromin expression (p=.028 and p<.001, respectively). Parafibromin expression was not associated with age, sex, lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, or tumor location. There was no statistically significant relationship between parafibromin expression and progression-free survival in the patients (p>.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the downregulation or loss of parafibromin expression can be employed as a novel marker of tumor progression or aggressiveness in LSCC.
Breast ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell* ; Disease-Free Survival ; Down-Regulation ; Epithelial Cells* ; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition ; Genes, Tumor Suppressor ; Head ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Lymph Nodes ; Neck ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Stomach

No abstract available.
Carcinoma, Papillary*

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in several stressors and difficulties among Filipinos, forcing everyone to cope with the limited resources. There are limited local studies on measuring how well Filipinos are coping in the pandemic. Knowledge on the predominant coping strategy during this crisis and which resources are lacking may guide physicians in tailoring appropriate interventions. Objective: The study aimed to determine the Family Resources and coping strategies of Filipino patients seen in a private, primary clinic in Bucandala (Imus, Cavite) during the COVID-19 pandemic, using the SCREEM Res and Filipino Coping Strategies (FCS) Scale, respectively. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out among adult patients who consulted at a private primary clinic in Imus from November to December 2020. Respondents answered a self-administered survey on sociodemographic profile, family resources (SCREEM Res) and coping strategies (FCS Scale). Results: A total of 140 respondents were included in the study. They almost equally belonged to the average (49.29%) or low income group (47.14%) with a median household size of 4.9. Many (44.29%) were unemployed. The median Total SCREEMRes score of the respondents was 25 (adequate). However, 42% of the respondents had moderately inadequate resources. The SCREEM Res domains of social, cultural and religious resources were adequate (median, 5) while the educational, economic and medical resources were moderately inadequate (median, 4). FCS scores were highest for the domains religiosity, problem solving and cognitive reappraisal and lowest for substance use. Conclusion Respondents had adequate social, cultural and religious family resources but moderately inadequate economic, educational and medical resources. Their predominant coping strategies include religiosity, problem solving and cognitive reappraisal. Family physicians may partner with families in augmenting their inadequate resources by maximizing the use of the dominant coping strategies.
COVID-19 ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Pandemics

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged health systems globally and prompted the publication of several guidelines. The experiences of our international colleagues should be utilized to protect patients and healthcare workers. The primary aim of this article is to appraise national guidelines for the perioperative anesthetic management of patients with COVID-19 so that they can be enhanced for the management of any resurgence of the epidemic. PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for guidelines related to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the World Federation Society of Anesthesiologists COVID-19 resource webpage was searched for national guidelines; the search was expanded to include countries with a high incidence of SARS-CoV. The guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Guidelines from Australia, Canada, China, India, Italy, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America were evaluated. All the guidelines focused predominantly on intubation and infection control. The scope and purpose of guidelines from China were the most comprehensive. The UK and South Africa provided the best clarity. Editorial independence, the rigor of development, and applicability scored poorly. Heterogeneity and gaps pertaining to preoperative screening, anesthesia technique, subspecialty anesthesia, and the lack of auditing of guidelines were identified. Evidence supporting the recommendations was weak. Early guidelines for the anesthetic management of COVID-19 patients lacked quality and a robust reporting framework. As new evidence emerges, national guidelines should be updated to enhance rigor, clarity, and applicability.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has challenged health systems globally and prompted the publication of several guidelines. The experiences of our international colleagues should be utilized to protect patients and healthcare workers. The primary aim of this article is to appraise national guidelines for the perioperative anesthetic management of patients with COVID-19 so that they can be enhanced for the management of any resurgence of the epidemic. PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for guidelines related to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the World Federation Society of Anesthesiologists COVID-19 resource webpage was searched for national guidelines; the search was expanded to include countries with a high incidence of SARS-CoV. The guidelines were evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Guidelines from Australia, Canada, China, India, Italy, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America were evaluated. All the guidelines focused predominantly on intubation and infection control. The scope and purpose of guidelines from China were the most comprehensive. The UK and South Africa provided the best clarity. Editorial independence, the rigor of development, and applicability scored poorly. Heterogeneity and gaps pertaining to preoperative screening, anesthesia technique, subspecialty anesthesia, and the lack of auditing of guidelines were identified. Evidence supporting the recommendations was weak. Early guidelines for the anesthetic management of COVID-19 patients lacked quality and a robust reporting framework. As new evidence emerges, national guidelines should be updated to enhance rigor, clarity, and applicability.

The location of the sigmoid colon varies within the abdominal cavity, but its mesocolon is fixed to the left side. Right side fixation of the sigmoid colon is a very rare congenital positional anomaly. In addition, it has been reported that hepatocolic fistula is also a very rare disease that may present lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Here, the authors describe a case of a 71-year-old man who underwent surgery for hepato-sigmoidocolic fistula complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma and the right side fixation of the sigmoid colon.
Abdominal Cavity ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Colon, Sigmoid ; Fistula ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Mesocolon ; Rare Diseases

Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola ; epidemiology ; Hospitals ; standards ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Patient Isolation ; organization & administration ; standards ; Patient Transfer ; organization & administration ; standards ; Simulation Training ; Singapore

Hyponatraemia with rapid correction of serum sodium may cause an osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) with damage to pontine and/or extrapontine areas of the brain. The prognosis of ODS can range from complete recovery to death; at present, our ability to predict clinical outcome is very limited. We describe here a patient with ODS and increased signal intensity in the striatum on diffusion-weighted MRI, with corresponding low apparent diffusion coeffi cient values (indicating restricted water diffusion). This case provides a further example of the typical MRI appearance of extrapontine ODS and suggests the potential value of diffusion-weighted MRI in predicting prognosis in ODS.

No abstract available.
Fibroadenoma

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the contributors to the burden of non-communicable disease. Health education is a key component in COPD management. Effective health education interventions directed to patient, family and community are necessary to prevent exacerbations, emergency room visits, hospitalizations and improve quality of life for patients with COPD. The general objective of the study was to determine effectiveness of health education interventions directed to patient, family and community. Specifically, to determine the effect on the number of acute exacerbations, COPD related emergency room visits and hospitalizations, improvement in the quality of life and patient satisfaction. Methods: This study only included comparative clinical trials randomized or non- randomized, parallel or cross-over clinical trial design, cohort study involving humans as the participants. It also includes published studies in peer reviewed journals of PubMed, clinical trials registered Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the grey literature. There were no foreign language studies included relevant to this review. The non-comparative clinical trials, outcomes research or real-world data, animal experiments, reviews and case reports were excluded. The study population of reviewed literature has an established diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease based on the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria for diagnosis of COPD. Studies involving COPD patients who have other co morbidities were also included. The patients with COPD in the study were similar to patients consulting in family and community medicine practice clinics in the Philippines. Data synthesis was done separately for each type of intervention, i.e., patient directed, family directed, community directed health education intervention on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Quantitative analysis was only possible for studies reporting similar outcomes and units of measures such as number of COPD-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits for health education intervention directed to patient and improvement in the quality-of-life scores for health education intervention directed to family and community. Narrative synthesis was done when it was not feasible to include studies to do pooled analysis due to any of the following reasons such as different outcomes and when outcomes not reported as means with standard deviation. The Review Manager 5 software was used in the analysis of the data. Sensitivity analysis was done by restricting the analysis to published studies and with low risk of bias. Results: A total of ten studies were included. Health education interventions directed to patient has no benefit in decreasing the number of COPD related emergency room visits (1.84, 95% CI 0.94,2.74) and insufficient evidence to decrease the number of COPD related hospitalizations (4.33,95%CI-4.69,13.34). Health education intervention directed to family have insufficient evidence to improve the quality of life among patients with COPD (0.35,95% CI -0.49,1.19). Community directed health education intervention have significantly improved the quality of life among patients with COPD (-1.95,95% CI -3.37, -0.53).The studies had low risk for bias in terms of random sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessment except for one study that was a non-randomized trial (Tabari et al, 2018). The highest risk for bias across the studies was the non-blinding of the participants. The withdrawals or dropouts in one study exceeded 20%. Three studies reported non possibility of blinding the assessor (Marques et al 2015, Nguyen et al 2019, Tabari et al 2018). Furthermore, five studies (Gallefos, 2004, Hernandez et al 2015, Tabari et al 2018, Van Wetering et al 2010, Marques et al, 2015) did not report the use of intention to treat analysis Discussion Effective health education interventions directed to patient, family and community in conjunction with standard of care may decrease exacerbations, hospitalizations, emergency visits, better quality of life and patient satisfaction. The studies included for this review were heath education interventions solely directed to patient, to family and to community and not a combination of the interventions directed to patient and family, or patient and community, or patient and family and community. Overall, health education interventions are integrated in a patient centered family focused community-oriented care for COPD. Health education is just one of the components of the integrated care on COPD. Better control of COPD is likely due to the combined effects of the different care components. Hence, there is a need for more randomized controlled trials on health education interventions directed to patient and family. Inclusion of COPD related hospitalizations, emergency room visits, acute exacerbations as outcome measures in health education interventions directed to patient, family and community is useful to provide evidence in effectiveness of the intervention. The authors declare no financial or funding involvement in the development and implementation of this study. This protocol was registered with Research Grants Administration Office (RGAO) with Registration No. RGAO-2020-1276, Research Implementation Development Office (RIDO) and to the Research Committee of the Philippine Academy of Family Physicians. The study was given Certification of Exemption from Ethical Review by the University of the Philippines Research Ethics Board (UPMREB CODE: UPMREB 2020-783-EX
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive