Objective To evaluate the significance of COLD-PCR in detecting KRAS mutation of pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer patients. Methods First, set up COLD-PCR and compared the sensitivities of COLD-PCR/Sanger sequencing with PCR/Sanger sequencing using mixed cell lines ( KRAS wild-type cell line SW116 and KRAS mutant cell line SW480).Then, detected KRAS mutation of 20 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of pancreatic cancer and 39 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of colorectal cancer using PCR/Sanger sequencing and COLD-PCR/Sanger sequencing, respectively and compared the coincidence rate and consistency. Results The low detection limits of PCR/Sanger respectively. KRAS frequency detected by COLD-PCR/Sanger sequencing [75% (15/20)] in 20 cases of pancreatic cancer was higher than that detected by regular PCR/Sanger sequencing [40% ( 8/20 ) ,x2 =5.013, P < 0.05]. KRAS frequency detected by COLD-PCR/Sanger sequencing [44% (17/39)] in 39 cases of colorectal cancer was higher than that detected by regular PCR/Sanger sequencing [31% (12/39) ,x2 =1. 372, P = 0. 174]. The coincidence rate of these two methods was 0. 730 and the difference had no statistical significance. The coincidence rate of detecting KRAS mutation was 65% in pancreatic cancer and the results showed a good correlation between two methods and the two methods had bad agreement in diagnosis (Kappa = 0. 364, P < 0. 05 ). COLD-PCR/Sanger sequencing could detect more cases of KRAS mutations from pancreatic caner than regular PCR/Sanger sequencing. This was because there were many non-tumor cells in pancreatic tumor tissue and COLD-PCR/Sanger sequencing was more sensitive than regular PCR/Sanger sequencing. The coincidence rate of detecting KRAS mutations was 87% in colorectal cancer and the results were showed a good correlation between two methods and the two methods had substantical agreement in diagonsis ( Kappa = 0. 730, P < 0. 05 ) . Conclusion COLD-PCR/Sanger sequencing is highly sensitive to screen KRAS mutation in pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer patients.

Objective:To explore the influence of multidimensional integration and 360° support on the function of family and marriage, and quality of life in women patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.Methods:Totally 196 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University from August 2016 to November 2017 were included. According to random number table method, these patients were divided into observation group and control group as 98 cases each. Conventional care and hospital discharge were used for control group. On the basis of this, multidimensional integration and 360° support were used for patients of observation group. The function of family and marriage, quality of life in patients were assessed before and after 3 months of the intervention. The treatment adherence was evaluated in 3 months and 6 months after intervention.Results:Before intervention, the marriage family function score, marital satisfaction, conflict resolution methods and the relationship with friends and family, husband and wife exchange scores of the observation group were (2.3 ± 0.5), (24.6 ± 6.1), (25.7 ± 7.1), (28.2 ± 6.9), (28.8 ± 6.9) points, respectively. Three months after intervention, these scores were (2.5 ± 0.7), (31.6 ± 5.0), (31.7 ± 5.3), (28.1 ± 6.8), (29.0 ± 7.1) points, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between before and after the intervention ( t values were -2.371 - 8.631, P < 0.01). These scores of control group before the intervention were (2.3 ± 0.6), (24.5 ± 6.2), (25.2 ± 7.2), (32.5 ± 6.0), (33.9 ± 6.3) points, respectively. Three months after intervention, these scores were (2.3 ± 0.4), (24.5 ± 6.2), (26.1 ± 6.9), (29.1± 4.8), (28.5 ± 7.2) points. Significant differeces were found between before and after the intervention in control group ( t values were -3.878-6.323, P < 0.05 or 0.01). There was statistically significant difference between the two groups after the intervention ( t values were 2.675-8.631, P<0.01). As for observation group, planning (62.8 ± 27.2 vs. 75.5 ± 25.4) and intimate relationship (62.8 ± 25.2 vs. 78.2± 24.9) in quality of life were obviously difference before and after 3 months of intervention ( t values were 3.050, 3.639, P < 0.01). As for control group, planning (62.5 ± 27.6 vs. 65.7 ± 24.9) and intimate relationship (65.8 ±25.2 vs. 63.5 ± 23.8) in quality of life were obviously difference before and after 3 months of intervention ( t values were 2.375, 3.132, P < 0.01). There was statistically significant difference between the two groups after the intervention ( t values were 3.050, 3.639, P < 0.01). The treatment adherence of observation group was significant better than control group. After 6 months intervention, the treatment adherece of observation group was 83.67% (82/98), while the treatment adherece of control group was 44.89% (44/98), significant differences were found btween the two groups ( χ2 value was 0.511, P < 0.01). Conclusion:Multidimensional integration and 360° support obviously improved function of family and marriage, improved the understanding of disease, and self-management ability of patients. Therefore, it can increase the treatment adherence and improve quality of life in SLE patients.