Objective:To study and compare the prognosis of different pathological subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Methods:Clinicopathological and prognostic data of 1 346 cases of postoperative renal cell carcinoma during July 2002 to June 2014 in West China Hospital were collected retrospectively.There were 839 males and 507 females, aged (55.1±13.4)years, including 1 120 cases of clear cell RCC, 62 cases of papillary RCC, 79 cases of chromophobe RCC and 85 cases of the other pathological types respectively. ECOG 0 and ≥1 were 911 and 435 cases, with; T 1, T 2, T 3 and T 4 of 1 019, 177, 102 and 48 cases respectively; WHO nuclear grade for well, intermediate, poor differentiation and unknown were 587, 530, 85 and 144 cases separately.Tumor size <5cm, 5-10cm, ≥10cm and unknown were 685, 541, 104 and 16 cases.Combined with necrosis or sacromatoid differentiation were 200/1 146 and 27/1 319 cases separately. Meanwhile, data of 80 439 cases from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) were also collected.There were 51 371 males and 29 068 females, aged (60.9±12.4) years; , with 66 261, 8 680, 5 022 and 476 cases of White, Black, Asian, American native, or unknown race separately. There were 62 600 of clear cell RCC, 12 170 of papillary RCC, 4 354 of chromophobe RCC and 1 315 of other pathological types, with T 1, T 2, T 3 and T 4 of 55 332, 8 687, 15 516 and 904 cases respectively; WHO nuclear grade for well, intermediate and poor differentiation were 52 323, 22 700 and 5 416 cases separately.Tumor size <5cm, 5-10cm, ≥10cm were 46 741, 25 760 and 7 938 cases respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed on these two group of cases, with different factors between subgroups (gender, age, pathological types, tumor stage, size and nuclear grade) evaluated by log-rank test. To evaluate accuracy of outcome prediction models of SSIGN, Leibovich and UISS score, concordance index of these models were evaluated. Results:In 1 346 cases of our cohort, those with chromophobe RCC were well prognostic, survival were relatively better in clear cell RCC than that of papillary RCC, and worst prognosis were demonstrated in those with other types of RCC (5 year overall survival rate: 97.5%, 87.9%, 79.7% and 68.4% separately). Poor prognosis were seen in those older than 50 years, with poor T stage or nuclear grade, large tumor size and tumors with necrosis or sacromatoid differentiation ( P<0.05). In 80 439 seer cases, the best prognosis was also seen in chromophobe RCC and the worst in other type of RCC separately (5 year overall survival rate: 96.3% and 85.3%). In addition, longer survival was seen in papillary RCC than clear cell RCC (5 year overall survival rate: 92.5% and 88.9%). However, similar results with our cohort were seen in Asian and American native subgroup of SEER cases (95.1%, 88.6%, 86.7%, 80.2% for chromophobe, clear cell, papillary and other types of RCC respectively). Poor prognosis were seen in those older than 50 years, males, Asian/ American Indian, poor T stage or nuclear grade and large tumor size ( P<0.05). Concordance index for SSIGN, Leibovich and UISS models in our cohort were 0.763-0.781, 0.725-0.752 and 0.641-0.660, respectively. The chromophobe RCC subgroup was relative better based on predictive value of prognosis models(c-index of UISS of 0.670-0.781, SSIGN and Leibovich of 0.733-0.903). Conclusions:In Asian RCC population, prognosis of chromophobe RCC is best, clear cell RCC is slightly better than papillary RCC, and the prognosis of other types of RCC is the worst. Concordance index of SSIGN and Leibovich in our cohort were higher than that of UISS, and the use value for predictive model was better in the chromophobe RCC subgroup.

Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus extraperitoneal single port RARP.Methods:A retrospective analysis was perfoumed on 142 cases of RARP from July 2019 to June 2020 in Robotic Minimally Invasive Center of Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, including 82 cases(Group A) , aged 70.0(65.6-78.0), undergoing transperitoneal RARP and 60 cases(Group B), aged 68.2 years old(60.1-79.2), undergoing extraperitoneal single port RARP. For group A, PSA was 12.9(5.6-64.0) ng/ml, with 26 cases of less than 10 ng/ml(31.7%), 40 cases of 10-20 ng/ml(48.8%), and 16 cases of more than 20 ng/ml(19.5%), the Gleason score was 7.2(6.0-10.0), with 14 cases(17.1%) of ≤6, 56 cases(68.3%) of 7, and 12 cases(14.6%) of ≥8, and the prostate volume was 61.3(29.0-112.0) ml. There were 49 cases with BMI≤25 kg/m 2, accounting for 59.8%, and 33 cases with BMI>25 kg/m 2, accounting for 40.2%. There were 17 cases(20.7%) of T 1, 44 cases(53.7%) of T 2 and 21 cases(25.6%) of T 3. The proportion of lymph node dissection was 17.1%, and 4 cases(4.9%)had a history of operation. For group B, the PSA was 12.2(1.0-42.6)ng/ml, with 20 cases (33.3%) of <10 ng/ml, 31 cases(51.7%)of 10-20 ng/ml, and 9 cases (15%) of >20 ng/ml. Gleason score was 7.1(6.0-9.0), with 12 cases (20.0%) of ≤6, 42 cases (70.0%) of 7, and 6 cases (10.0%)of ≥8. Prostate volume was 42.4(31.2-72.8)ml on average. There were 37 cases (61.7%) with BMI≤25 kg/m 2, and 23 cases (38.3%)with BMI >25 kg/m 2 . There were 17 cases(28.3%)of T 1, 32 cases(53.3%)of T 2 and 11 cases(18.3%)of T 3.The proportion of lymph node dissection was 11.7% and 4 cases (6.7%) had a history of operation.There was no statistically significant difference in term of age, PSA level, Gleason score, BMI, clinical stage, proportion of lymph node dissection or history of operation between the two groups( P>0.05), but there was statistically significant difference for prostate volume( P<0.05). All operations were performed by the same operator. Four different ways of bladder neck and urethral dissociation was selected according to the intraoperative conditions in Group A, include VIP style, T-shape incision style, VIP plus T-shape incision style or the style along the lateral side of the bladder neck. Small and single anterograde incision stripping of bladder neck was routinely performed in the Group B. Postoperative follow-up was performed to compare the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bladder neck and urethral anastomosis time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative complications, positive rate of surgical margin, indwelling time of urinary catheter, urinary continence satisfaction rate of immediately after operation, 3 months and 6 months after operation, wound healing and aesthetics. Results:All of the operations were successfully completed under robot-assisted laparoscopy, and there was no conversion to open surgery. The operation time was 56.0(45.0-112.0) min in the Group A and 65.4(55.5-96.8) min in the Group B, and there was no statistically significant difference( P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss was 76.2(30.0-120.5) ml and 55.6(45.5-114.6) ml, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant( P>0.05). The time of bladder neck urethral anastomosis was 18.9(12.6-25.6) min and 16.2(10.7-19.3) min, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant( P>0.05). The postoperative hospital stay days were 9.3(8.0-16.0) d and 8.4(7.0-13.0) d, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant( P>0.05). The postoperative exhaust time was 1.3(0.7-3.0) d and 3.4(2.0-7.0) d, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant( P<0.05). There was 1 case of anastomotic fistula with ureteral injury in Group A, and no serious complication in Group B, and the difference was not statistically significant( P>0.05). The number of positive surgical margin in the two groups was 13(15.9%)and 9(15.0%)respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant( P>0.05). The indwelling time of urinary catheter after operation was 9(7-21) d and 6(4-8) d, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant( P<0.05). The number of patients with satisfactory urinary continence immediately after surgery, 3 months and 6 months after surgery in the two groups were 8(9.8%), 51(62.2%), 62(75.6%) and 17(28.3%), 43(71.7%) and 54(90.0%), respectively. The differences were statistically significant( P<0.05). The total incision lengths in the two groups were 12.1(10.4-13.4) cm and 5.6(5.0-6.0) cm, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant( P<0.05). Conclusions:The extraperitoneal single port RARP is safe and feasible, and the postoperative effect is similar to that of transperitoneal RARP. It has the advantages of shorter recovery time, higher urinary continence satisfaction rate, neater and more beautiful incision. The long-term therapeutic effect needs further confirming by prospective study.

Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of different bladder neck separation methods in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP).Methods:To retrospective analysis the data of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP)in our center from October, 2014 to October, 2018. All operations were performed by the same urologist. According to the different methods of bladder neck separationAccording to the different methods of bladder neck separation, all the patients were divided into four groups. Group A routine forward peeling method (500 cases): Make a 1cm incision at 12 o'clock on the front of the bladder neck, cut off the detrusor muscle and cut the bladder neck. Group B T-cut incision of the bladder neck (133 cases): identify the bladder and prostate Junction, T-shaped incision of the anterior wall of the bladder neck. Group C conventional stripping method combined with T-shaped incision of the bladder neck (81 cases). Group D lateral approach (36 cases): along the lateral side of the bladder neck and the medial posterior ligament of the prostate is separated and merges with the previously established Dirichlet space. The general data of patients were analyzed statistically.The average ages of groups A, B, C, and D were 63 years (62.5 to 67 years), 65 years (61 to 68 years), 66 years (64.5 to 70.5 years), and 62 years (59.5 to 66.5 years)respectively, there was no statistical significance difference in terms of age in 4 groups( P>0.05); PSA is 13 ng/ml(9.0 to 22 ng/ml), 7.4 ng/ml(6.4 to 26.0 ng/ml), 6.2 ng/ml(5.3 to 27.0 ng/ml), 14ng/ml(8.4 to 21.0 ng/ml), ( P>0.05); Gleason scores of puncture were 6.9(5 to 9), 7(6 to 12), 9(8 to 16), 10(6 to 18), ( P>0.05); the prostate volume was 66ml(42 to 78 ml), 70ml(50 to 89 ml), 53ml (43 to 72 ml), 80 ml (68 to 92 ml), ( P>0.05); the proportions of body mass index ≤25 kg/m 2 were 60.0%, 63.9%, 39.1%, 42.0%, and>25 kg/m 2 were 40%, 36.1%, 60.9%, and 58.0%, respectively, ( P>0.05). The operation time, bleeding volume, anastomosis time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, positive rate of proximal incision margin, urinary indwelling time, and urinary control rate in the four groups analyzed. Results:All 750 RARP operations were successful, and none were converted to open.The operation time of groups A, B, C, and D were 100 min(70 to 120 min), 89 min(70 to 95 min), 105 min(80 to 127 min), and 110 min(90 to 130 min), ( P>0.05); anastomosis time was 20.5 min (18.0 to 25.0 min)、16.1min (10.7 to 17.3 min)、25.4 min (18.9 to 27.0 min)、and 28.5 min (21.0 to 32.0 min), the anastomosis time in group B was significantly shorter than other groups ( P<0.05); the postoperative hospital stays were 9.3 days (8.0 to 13.0 days), 8.4 days (6.0 to 16.0 days), 10.8 days (8.0 to 16.0 days)and 7.8 days (7.0 to 14.0 days), ( P>0.05). Postoperative complications: Anastomotic fistula and ureteral injury occurred in 3 cases in group A, and no serious complications occurred in the other 3 groups. Proximal marginal positive rate: 40 cases (8.0%) in group A, 0 cases in group B, 6 cases (7.3%) in group C, 3 cases (8.3%) in group D, and low positive rate of margin incision in group B( P<0.05). The urinary indwelling time was 7 d (6 to 8 d), 6 d(4 to 8 d), 12 d(6 to 18 d), 10 d(6 to 13 d), ( P>0.05). Six-month postoperative urine control rate: 381 cases (75.2%) in group A, 102 cases (76.9%) in group B, 61 (75.4%) in group C, and 27 (73.8%) in group D, ( P>0.05). Conclusions:The above four method of bladder neck separation during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is safe and feasible, which can effectively avoid ureteral damage. Each method can obtain better urine control within six months after surgery rate. The positive rate of proximal incision margin after T-shaped bladder neck was lowest among four groups.

Six patients with prostate cancer, treated by suprapubic extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, had been studied retrospectively from December 2019 to January 2020. All 6 patients have been treated by suprapubic peritoneum single port robot assisted laparoscopic surgery without other channels. The robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy via suprapubic peritoneum is safe and feasible when based on reasonable selection criteria of patients. It has been shown that the postoperative recovery was fast and the tumor control and continence rate were good under the short-term follow-up. However, the long-term outcome should be evaluated by a long-term follow-up.

Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and clinical efficiency of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) via extraperitoneal PORT-free single incision approach.Methods:The data of 33 patients with prostate cancer underwent the extraperitoneal PORT-free single incision RARP from November 2020 to January 2021 in Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital was retrospectively reviewed. The average age was 66.7 (58-78) years, the median PSA was 20.77 (2.89, 56.44) ng/m, and the mean Gleason score was 7.0 (6.0-9.0). The mean prostate volume was 48.4 (25.0-220.0) ml. Clinical stage: 32 cases was in cT 2a-2cN 0M 0, 1 case in cT 3aN 0M 0. 16 cases had a history of operation. All 33 operations were performed by the same operator. All operations were performed by extraperitoneal PORT-free single-incision approach. The surgical condition, postoperative complication, pathology, and follow-up results were observed. Results:In this study, 33 operations were successfully completed without conversion to open or additional single hole channel instruments. The average operation time was 61.3 (38.0-120.0) min, with the mean intraoperative bleeding volume of 72.2 (45.0-220.0) ml and the mean bladder neck urethral anastomosis time of 11.7 (8.5-15.7) min. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.9 (6.0-15.0) d, the mean postoperative indwelling time of urinary catheter was 6.8 (6.0-14.0) d, and the mean postoperative evacuation time was 1.0 (0.5-3.0) d. The average incision length was 5.2 (4.6-5.8) cm. There was no obvious complications. The postoperative pathological stage: 21 cases were in < pT 3a, 12 cases were in ≥ pT 3a, and 6 cases (18.8%) had positive resection margin. 29 cases (88.9%) acquired satisfactory urinary continence after operation, and the frequency of urinary pad use was ≤ 1 tablet/day. Conclusions:The extraperitoneal single-incision RARP surgical channel without PORT is safe and feasible with a satisfying cosmetic effect, which saves costs and requires less specific channel device. Simultaneously, the new approach has strong replicability, short-term tumor control and urinary control effect with rapid postoperative recovery. However, the sample size of this study is relatively small, which needs further research and demonstration

With the development of minimally invasive technology, robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become the main method and gold standard in the treatment of organ-localized prostate cancer. After previous exploration of various surgical approaches and surgical methods in our center, we first proposed the modified (port-free) single-site RARP (pf-ssRARP), which has been proved safe and feasible by theoretical verification and practical operation. The technique has certain advantages in postoperative rehabilitation, urinary control recovery, sexual function improvement, incision cosmetics and social economics. In this paper, the key steps of this technique are introduced and illustrated in detail.