Surgery is an important method for the treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. With the continuous development of minimally invasive esophageal technology, video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE) has demonstrated obvious advantages over conventional open surgery and has been widely accepted. However, there are still some esophageal cancer patients who cannot benefit from VATE. Inflatable video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy(IVMTE) does not require one-lung ventilation, reduces postoperative complications, expands surgical indications, and brings surgical opportunities for patients with impaired lung function and thoracic lesions, which has become a new choice for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, the limited field of surgical view and the tunneling surgical approach undoubtedly increase the difficulty of surgery, and how to clearly expose the anatomical structures and thoroughly dissect the lymph nodes has always been the key points and difficulties of surgery. The authors review relevant literatures to discuss the clinical progress and limitations of IVMTE.

Objective To explore the risk factors of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in severe trauma patients, put forward a new warning scoring system of MODS, and to provide a more accurate scoring method for doctors to judge the clinical condition and prognosis of patients. Methods Clinical data of 342 patients with severe trauma admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College and Daping Hospital of the Third Military Medical University from January 1st, 2015 to December 31st, 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into MODS groups (n = 251) and non-MODS group (n = 91) according to clinical outcomes. The clinical data of patients, including gender, age, heart rate (HR) and blood pressure within 24 hours after admission to the hospital, indicators of blood routine and blood biochemistry, severity of disease, severity of trauma, whether received the emergency intubation or surgery within 24 hours or not, whether developed sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) during hospitalization, were recorded, and univariate analysis was conducted. The indicators with statistical significance found by univariate analysis were enrolled in multivariate Logistic regression analysis, and the risk factors for MODS in patients with severe trauma were screened and assigned, and the final total score was MODS warning score. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate MODS warning score for predicting the occurrence of MODS in patients with severe trauma. Results Compared with non-MODS group, HR, Na+, serum creatinine (SCr), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHEⅡ) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score in MODS group were significantly increased, pH value, red blood cell (RBC), platelet (PLT), albumin (Alb) and Glasgow coma score (GCS) were remarkably decreased, and multiple injury, the patients with shock at admission, blood transfusion, central venous catheter, emergency intubation and infection were also increased, and more patients suffered from sepsis and ARDS. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the number of injured places equal or more than 2, shock at admission, APACHEⅡ score ≥ 15, SOFA score ≥ 4 and APTT > 40 s were risk factors for MODS in patients with severe trauma, with total MODS warning score of 7.5. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under ROC curve (AUC) of MODS warning score for predicting MODS in patients with severe trauma was 0.822, which was significantly higher than that of APACHEⅡ score (AUC = 0.698, P < 0.001), APTT (AUC = 0.693, P < 0.001) and SOFA score (AUC = 0.770, P = 0.025). When the cut-off value of MODS warning score was 2.5, the sensitivity was 61.35%, the specificity was 90.11%, and Youden index was 0.515. Conclusions MODS warning score is composed of five factors, including the number of injured places, shock at admission, APACHEⅡ score, SOFA score and APTT, which could be regarded as early warning score system for predicting MODS in patients with severe trauma. MODS warning score can be more comprehensive and timely to assess the possibility of MODS and prognosis of patients with severe trauma, and the prediction result is better than the single use of APTT, APACHEⅡ or SOFA score.

Objective     To explore the effect of standardized use of antibiotics on clinical indicators after thoracic surgery, such as pulmonary infection rate, incision infection rate, average length of hospital stay and total hospitalization cost. Methods     We selected 468 patients (an observation group) who were hospitalized and received thoracic surgery from August to October 2011, 3 months after the implementation of the preventive antibiotics use protocol for thoracic surgery in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and selected 343 patients (a control group) in the same period of the previous year (from August to October 2010). There were 326 males and 142 females with a mean age of 52.0±15.5 years in the observation group, and 251 males and 92 females with a mean age of 51.4±15.9 years in the control group. The level of antibiotic use, medication time, antibiotics cost, postoperative incision infection, incidence of pulmonary infection, postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization cost were compared between the two groups. Results     Compared with the control group, the time for preventive use of antibiotics was significantly shorter in the observation group (3.6±2.4 d vs. 6.1±3.1 d, P=0.020) and the total cost of antibiotic use significantly reduced (1 230.0±2 151.0 yuan vs. 2 252.0±1 764.0 yuan, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in hospitalization cost (36 345.0±13 320.0 yuan vs. 35 821.0±11 991.0 yuan, P=0.566), postoperative hospital stay (10.6±8.4 d vs. 10.7±5.3 d, P=0.390), the incidence of postoperative wound infection or postoperative pulmonary infection (1.5% vs. 2.3%, P=0.430; 19.2% vs. 22.2%, P=0.330). Conclusion     The standardized use of antibiotics in thoracic surgery does not cause   postoperative pulmonary infection and incision infection, and has no negative impact on clinical indicators. Significantly reducing the level of antibiotics use may have a positive effect on reducing medication time, in-hospital infection and the incidence of drug-resistant strains.