1.Comparison of the impact of applications of Targeted Transfusion Protocol and Massive Transfusion Protocol in trauma patients.
Shahram PAYDAR ; Hosseinali KHALILI ; Golnar SABETIAN ; Behnam DALFARDI ; Shahram BOLANDPARVAZ ; Mohammad Hadi NIAKAN ; Hamidreza ABBASI ; Donat R SPAHN
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2017;70(6):626-632
BACKGROUND: The current study assessed a recently developed resuscitation protocol for bleeding trauma patients called the Targeted Transfusion Protocol (TTP) and compared its results with those of the standard Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP). METHODS: Per capita utilization of blood products such as packed red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelet concentrates was compared along with mortality rates during two 6-month periods, one in 2011 (when the standard MTP was followed) and another in 2014 (when the TTP was used). In the TTP, patients were categorized into three groups based on the presence of head injuries, long bone fractures, or penetrating injuries involving the trunk, extremities, or neck who were resuscitated according to separate algorithms. All cases had experienced motor vehicle accidents and had injury severity scores over 16. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the study groups at hospital admission. Per capita utilization of RBC (4.76 ± 0.92 vs. 3.37 ± 0.55; P = 0.037), FFP (3.71 ± 1.00 vs. 2.40 ± 0.52; P = 0.025), and platelet concentrate (1.18 ± 0.30 vs. 0.55 ± 0.18; P = 0.006) blood products were significantly lower in the TTP epoch. Mortality rates were similar between the two study periods (P = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of the TTP reduced the requirements for RBCs, FFP, and platelet concentrates in severely injured trauma patients.
Blood Platelets
;
Craniocerebral Trauma
;
Erythrocytes
;
Extremities
;
Fractures, Bone
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Injury Severity Score
;
Mortality
;
Motor Vehicles
;
Neck
;
Plasma
;
Resuscitation
;
Wounds and Injuries
2.Outcome of penetrating cardiac injuries in southern Iran, Shiraz.
Mansour JANATI ; Shahram BOLANDPARVAZ ; Shirvan SALAMINIA ; Hamed-Ghoddusi JOHARI ; Babak SABET ; Javad KOJURI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2013;16(2):89-93
OBJECTIVECardiac injuries are one of the most challenging injuries in the field of trauma surgery. Their management often requires immediate surgical intervention, excellent surgical technique and the ability to provide excellent postoperative critical care to patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome and survival rate of patients with penetrating cardiac injury in southern Iran, Shiraz.
METHODSFrom January 2001 to June 2007, medical records of all patients suffering from penetrating cardiac injuries were reviewed and their outcomes were investigated. The inclusion criterion was the presence of a confirmed penetrating cardiac injury intraoperatively or by autopsy. Patients with blunt cardiac injuries were excluded from the study.
RESULTSThe study consisted of 37 patients, including 1 gunshot wound (2.7%), 35 stab wounds (94.6%) and 1 (2.7%) shotgun wound. The overall survival rate was 76% (28 in 37) and that in stab wound patients was 80%. The collected data of 9 expired patients revealed 11% death on arrival, 67% hypotensive, and 22% normotensive considering physiologic presentation. Paired sample test showed significant correlation between mortality and electrocardiographic changes, amount of retained blood in pericardium, clinical stage and physiologic condition at presentation, as well as associated injury type (gunshot more than stab wound).
CONCLUSIONOur results show that injury mechanism and initial cardiac rhythm are significant predictors of outcomes in patients with penetrating cardiac injuries. Besides, gunshot injury and exsanguination are the most important predictive variables of mortality.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Electrocardiography ; Female ; Heart Injuries ; mortality ; physiopathology ; Humans ; Iran ; epidemiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Survival Rate ; Wounds, Penetrating ; mortality ; physiopathology
3.Should we change our approach to resuscitating victims of femoral fracture? A clinical experience in a busy trauma hospital in Shiraz, Iran.
Shahram PAYDAR ; Ali TAHERI AKERDI ; Sadra NIKSERESHT ; Hossein ABDOLRAHIMZADEH-FARD ; Leila SHAYAN ; Zahra GHAHRAMANI ; Shahram BOLANDPARVAZ ; Hamid Reza ABBASI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2021;24(1):30-33
PURPOSE:
Traumatic hemorrhagic shock is a life-threatening event worldwide. Severe brain trauma accompanying femoral fractures can trigger inflammatory responses in the body and increase pre-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1. The primary treatment in these cases is hydration with crystalloids, which has both benefits and complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of fluid therapy on the hemodynamics, coagulation profiles, and blood gases in such patients.
METHODS:
In this cross-sectional study, patients were divided into two groups: femoral fracture group and non-femoral group. The hemodynamic status, coagulation profile, and blood gases of patients in both groups were evaluated upon arrival at the hospital and again 2 h later. Data were analyzed by t-test and ANOVA with repeated data and paired samples t-test.
RESULTS:
A total of 681 trauma patients (605 men and 76 women) participated in this study, including 69 (86.3%) men and 11 (13.8%) women in femoral fracture group and 536 men (89.2%) and 65 women (10.8%) in non-femoral group. The laboratory parameters were evaluated in response to the equal amount of crystalloid fluid given upon arrival and 2 h later. Blood gases decreased in the fracture group despite fluid therapy (p < 0.003), and the coagulation profile worsened although the change was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION
The treatment of multiple-trauma patients with femoral bone fractures should be more concerned with the need for the infusion of vasopressors such as norepinephrine. If there is evidence of clinical shock, excessive crystalloid infusion (limited to 1 L) should be avoided, and blood and blood products should be started as soon as possible.
4.Comparison of chest CT scan findings between COVID-19 and pulmonary contusion in trauma patients based on RSNA criteria: Established novel criteria for trauma victims.
Hossein ABDOLRAHIMZADEH FARD ; Salahaddin MAHMUDI-AZER ; Qusay ABDULZAHRAA YAQOOB ; Golnar SABETIAN ; Pooya IRANPOUR ; Zahra SHAYAN ; Shahram BOLANDPARVAZ ; Hamid Reza ABBASI ; Shiva AMINNIA ; Maryam SALIMI ; Mohammad Mehdi MAHMOUDI ; Shahram PAYDAR ; Roham BORAZJANI ; Ali TAHERI AKERDI ; Masome ZARE ; Leila SHAYAN ; Mohammadreza SASANI
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2022;25(3):170-176
PROPOSE:
In this study, we re-assessed the criteria defined by the radiological society of North America (RSNA) to determine novel radiological findings helping the physicians differentiating COVID-19 from pulmonary contusion.
METHODS:
All trauma patients with blunt chest wall trauma and subsequent pulmonary contusion, COVID-19-related signs and symptoms before the trauma were enrolled in this retrospective study from February to May 2020. Included patients (Group P) were then classified into two groups based on polymerase chain reaction tests (Group Pa for positive patients and Pb for negative ones). Moreover, 44 patients from the pre-pandemic period (Group PP) were enrolled. They were matched to Group P regarding age, sex, and trauma-related scores. Two radiologists blindly reviewed the CT images of all enrolled patients according to criteria defined by the RSNA criteria. The radiological findings were compared between Group P and Group PP; statistically significant ones were re-evaluated between Group Pa and Group Pb thereafter. Finally, the sensitivity and specificity of each significant findings were calculated. The Chi-square test was used to compare the radiological findings between Group P and Group PP.
RESULTS:
In the Group PP, 73.7% of all ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and 80% of all multiple bilateral GGOs were detected (p < 0.001 and p = 0.25, respectively). Single bilateral GGOs were only seen among the Group PP. The Chi-square tests showed that the prevalence of diffused GGOs, multiple unilateral GGOs, multiple consolidations, and multiple bilateral consolidations were significantly higher in the Group P (p = 0.001, 0.01, 0.003, and 0.003, respectively). However, GGOs with irregular borders and single consolidations were more significant among the Group PP (p = 0.01 and 0.003, respectively). Of note, reticular distortions and subpleural spares were exclusively detected in the Group PP.
CONCLUSION
We concluded that the criteria set by RSNA for the diagnosis of COVID-19 are not appropriate in trauma patients. The clinical signs and symptoms are not always useful either. The presence of multiple unilateral GGOs, diffused GGOs, and multiple bilateral consolidations favor COVID-19 with 88%, 97.62%, and 77.7% diagnostic accuracy.
COVID-19
;
Contusions/diagnostic imaging*
;
Humans
;
Lead
;
Lung/diagnostic imaging*
;
Lung Injury/etiology*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods*