Purpose: PL, creatinine and urine output are biomarkers of the suitability and prognosis of fluid therapy in severe burn patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of predicting mortality by biomarkers and its change during initial fluid therapy for severe burn patients. Methods: A retrograde review was performed on 733 patients from January 2014 to December 2018 who were admitted as severe burn patients to our burn intensive care unit (BICU). Plasma lactate, serum creatinine and urine output were measured at the time of admission to the BICU and after 48 hours. ABSI score, Hangang score, APACHEII, revised Baux index and TBSA were collected after admission. Results: 733 patients were enrolled. PL was the most useful indicators for predicting mortality in burn patients at the time of admission (AUC: 0.813) and after 48 hours (AUC: 0.698). On the other hand, mortality prediction from initial fluid therapy for 48 hours showed different results. Only creatinine showed statistical differences (P＜0.05) in mortality prediction. But there were no statistical differences in mortality prediction with PL and UO (P＞0.05). Conclusion In this study, PL was most useful predictor among biomarkers for predicting mortality. Improvement in creatinine levels during the first 48 hours is associated with improved mortality. Therefore, efforts are needed to improve creatinine levels.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with an aortoduodenal fistula (ADF) who underwent surgical treatment at a single institution. Materials and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with ADF at the Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, South Korea, between 2019 and 2022 were included. Primary repair and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy were the two main methods used to repair ADF. Results: Among the 15 patients analyzed, most were male, and the median age was 68 years. Based on the cause of ADF, five patients had primary ADF, whereas the remaining had secondary ADF. The average duration from fistula diagnosis to surgery was 23.5 days (2.8 days in primary ADF cases and 33.8 days in secondary ADF cases). Primary repair of the ADF was performed for eight patients, and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy was performed for the remaining patients.Omentopexy was performed for all patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 32.7 days. Three patients died after surgery;however, all 11 patients operated on by the single experienced surgeon survived until the last follow-up. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first original article on ADF. Our findings suggest that ADF repairs performed by experienced surgeons would provide favorable results. Although primary repair is the first treatment choice, duodenojejunostomy is recommended when it is not feasible. By choosing the appropriate procedure depending on the case, favorable outcomes without any fatalities can be achieved.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with an aortoduodenal fistula (ADF) who underwent surgical treatment at a single institution. Materials and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with ADF at the Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, South Korea, between 2019 and 2022 were included. Primary repair and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy were the two main methods used to repair ADF. Results: Among the 15 patients analyzed, most were male, and the median age was 68 years. Based on the cause of ADF, five patients had primary ADF, whereas the remaining had secondary ADF. The average duration from fistula diagnosis to surgery was 23.5 days (2.8 days in primary ADF cases and 33.8 days in secondary ADF cases). Primary repair of the ADF was performed for eight patients, and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy was performed for the remaining patients.Omentopexy was performed for all patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 32.7 days. Three patients died after surgery;however, all 11 patients operated on by the single experienced surgeon survived until the last follow-up. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first original article on ADF. Our findings suggest that ADF repairs performed by experienced surgeons would provide favorable results. Although primary repair is the first treatment choice, duodenojejunostomy is recommended when it is not feasible. By choosing the appropriate procedure depending on the case, favorable outcomes without any fatalities can be achieved.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with an aortoduodenal fistula (ADF) who underwent surgical treatment at a single institution. Materials and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with ADF at the Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, South Korea, between 2019 and 2022 were included. Primary repair and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy were the two main methods used to repair ADF. Results: Among the 15 patients analyzed, most were male, and the median age was 68 years. Based on the cause of ADF, five patients had primary ADF, whereas the remaining had secondary ADF. The average duration from fistula diagnosis to surgery was 23.5 days (2.8 days in primary ADF cases and 33.8 days in secondary ADF cases). Primary repair of the ADF was performed for eight patients, and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy was performed for the remaining patients.Omentopexy was performed for all patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 32.7 days. Three patients died after surgery;however, all 11 patients operated on by the single experienced surgeon survived until the last follow-up. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first original article on ADF. Our findings suggest that ADF repairs performed by experienced surgeons would provide favorable results. Although primary repair is the first treatment choice, duodenojejunostomy is recommended when it is not feasible. By choosing the appropriate procedure depending on the case, favorable outcomes without any fatalities can be achieved.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with an aortoduodenal fistula (ADF) who underwent surgical treatment at a single institution. Materials and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with ADF at the Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, South Korea, between 2019 and 2022 were included. Primary repair and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy were the two main methods used to repair ADF. Results: Among the 15 patients analyzed, most were male, and the median age was 68 years. Based on the cause of ADF, five patients had primary ADF, whereas the remaining had secondary ADF. The average duration from fistula diagnosis to surgery was 23.5 days (2.8 days in primary ADF cases and 33.8 days in secondary ADF cases). Primary repair of the ADF was performed for eight patients, and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy was performed for the remaining patients.Omentopexy was performed for all patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 32.7 days. Three patients died after surgery;however, all 11 patients operated on by the single experienced surgeon survived until the last follow-up. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first original article on ADF. Our findings suggest that ADF repairs performed by experienced surgeons would provide favorable results. Although primary repair is the first treatment choice, duodenojejunostomy is recommended when it is not feasible. By choosing the appropriate procedure depending on the case, favorable outcomes without any fatalities can be achieved.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of patients with an aortoduodenal fistula (ADF) who underwent surgical treatment at a single institution. Materials and Methods: The data of patients diagnosed with ADF at the Yonsei University Gangnam Severance Hospital, South Korea, between 2019 and 2022 were included. Primary repair and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy were the two main methods used to repair ADF. Results: Among the 15 patients analyzed, most were male, and the median age was 68 years. Based on the cause of ADF, five patients had primary ADF, whereas the remaining had secondary ADF. The average duration from fistula diagnosis to surgery was 23.5 days (2.8 days in primary ADF cases and 33.8 days in secondary ADF cases). Primary repair of the ADF was performed for eight patients, and segmental resection of the duodenum with duodeno-jejunostomy was performed for the remaining patients.Omentopexy was performed for all patients. The median duration of hospital stay was 32.7 days. Three patients died after surgery;however, all 11 patients operated on by the single experienced surgeon survived until the last follow-up. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first original article on ADF. Our findings suggest that ADF repairs performed by experienced surgeons would provide favorable results. Although primary repair is the first treatment choice, duodenojejunostomy is recommended when it is not feasible. By choosing the appropriate procedure depending on the case, favorable outcomes without any fatalities can be achieved.

Purpose: The usability of a new surgical navigation system that provides patient-specific vascular information for robotic gastrectomy in gastric cancer remains unexplored for laparoscopic gastrectomy owing to differences in surgical environments. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and safety of this navigation system in laparoscopic gastrectomy and to compare the post-operative outcomes between procedures with and without its use. Materials and Methods: Between June 2022 and July 2023, 38 patients across 2 institutions underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy using a navigation system (navigation group). The technical feasibility, safety, and accuracy of detecting variations in vascular anatomy were measured. The perioperative outcomes were compared with 114 patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy without a navigation system (non-navigation group) using 1:3 propensity score matching during the same study period. Results: In all patients in the navigation group, no adverse events associated with the navigation system occurred during surgery in any patient in the navigation group. No accidental vessel injuries necessitate auxiliary procedures. All vessels encountered during the gastrectomy were successfully reconstructed and visualized. Patient demographics and operative data were comparable between the 2 groups. The navigation group exhibited a significantly lower overall complication rate (10.5%) than the non-navigation group (26.3%, P=0.043). Notably, pancreas-related complications were absent in the navigation group but occurred in eight cases in the non-navigation group (7.0%, P=0.093), although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions The patient-specific surgical navigation system demonstrated clinical feasibility and safety for laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer, potentially reducing complication rates compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy without its use.