1.Evidence-based Medicine versus the Conventional Approach to Journal Club Sessions: Which One Is More Successful in Teaching Critical Appraisal Skills?
Mostafa ALAVI-MOGHADDAM ; Shahram YAZDANI ; Fathie MORTAZAVI ; Samira CHICHI ; Seyed Mostafa HOSSEINI-ZIJOUD
Chonnam Medical Journal 2016;52(2):107-111
This study aimed to compare evidence-based medicine (EBM) vs. conventional approaches to journal club sessions in teaching critical appraisal skills in reading papers by emergency medicine residents. This double cut off discontinuation regression quasi-experimental study was conducted among emergency medicine residents. EBM vs. the conventional approach were applied to teach critical appraisal skills for half of the residents as an experimental group and another half as a control group respectively. Both groups participated in one hour monthly journal club sessions for six months. Before and after the study, all participants were examined by two tests: the Fresno Test (FT) [to evaluate their knowledge about EBM] and the Critical Appraisal Skills Test (CAST) [to evaluate their competency with critical appraisal skills]. The allocation of the participants into the experimental or control groups was according to their CAST scores before the study. 50 emergency medicine residents participated. After the study, the scores of both groups in the FT and CAST significantly improved (p<0.01), and the promotion of scores of the FT and CAST in the experimental group were more than that of the conventional group (p<0.0001). The current study indicated that an evidence-based medicine approach in journal club sessions was comparatively more advantageous compared to the conventional approach in teaching critical appraisal skills for reading papers among the residents of emergency medicine.
Emergency Medicine
;
Evidence-Based Medicine
;
Internship and Residency
;
Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.The Effects of Air Pollution on Ischemic Stroke Admission Rate
Hossein ALIMOHAMMADI ; Sara FAKHRI ; Hojjat DERAKHSHANFAR ; Seyed Mostafa HOSSEINI-ZIJOUD ; Saeed SAFARI ; Hamid Reza HATAMABADI
Chonnam Medical Journal 2016;52(1):53-58
The present study aimed to determine the relationship between the level of air pollutants and the rate of ischemic stroke (IS) admissions to hospitals. In this retrospective cross-sectional study, stroke admissions (January-March 2012 and 2013) to an emergency department and air pollution and meteorological data were gathered. The relationship between air pollutant levels and hospital admission rates were evaluated using the generalize additive model. In all 379 patients with IS were referred to the hospital (52.5% male; mean age 68.2+/-13.3 years). Both transient (p<0.001) and long-term (p<0.001) rises in CO level increases the risk of IS. Increased weekly (p<0.001) and monthly (p<0.001) average O3 levels amplifies this risk, while a transient increase in NO2 (p<0.001) and SO2 (p<0.001) levels has the same effect. Long-term changes in PM(10) (p<0.001) and PM(2.5) (p<0.001) also increase the risk of IS. The findings showed that the level of air pollutants directly correlates with the number of stroke admissions to the emergency department.
Air Pollutants
;
Air Pollution
;
Cross-Sectional Studies
;
Emergency Service, Hospital
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Patient Admission
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Stroke