1.Implant Selection for Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association 2013;48(2):142-150
Anatomical reduction is essential for successful treatment of distal radius fractures. In-depth understanding of the implant is mandatory in order to obtain adequate fixation of the fracture fragments and to avoid implant-related complications. Selection of an improper implant and screw length may lead to rupture of flexor or extensor tendon as a complication. This article will briefly discuss the pros and cons of the traditional fixation methods such as percutaneous pin fixation and external fixation, and will focus on the recent development of the volar locking plate. Variable-angle locking plate, which was introduced in an effort to provide surgeons with more freedom for fixation, may have inadequate fixation strength if screw locking is repeated. From the biomechanical study, at least four distal locking screws are enough to have strength to maintain fracture fixation. Measuring screw length may be difficult; therefore, information about the ratio of the metaphysis and diaphysis will be helpful in deciding on the proper screw length. Locking screws are recommended as they are stronger than locking pegs. In order to avoid flexor tendon ruptures, the plate should not be placed too far distally.
Diaphyses
;
Fracture Fixation
;
Freedom
;
Patient Selection
;
Radius
;
Radius Fractures
;
Rupture
;
Tendons
2.The Effect of Urocortin 1 on Motility in Isolated, Vascularly Perfused Rat Colon.
Il Young YOU ; Seungho LEE ; Ki Bae KIM ; Hee Seung LEE ; Jong Soon JANG ; Myeongho YEON ; Joung Ho HAN ; Soon Man YOON ; Hee Bok CHAE ; Seon Mee PARK ; Sei Jin YOUN
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2015;65(5):283-290
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Urocortin 1, a corticotropin-releasing factor related peptide, increases colonic motility under stressful conditions. We investigated the effect of urocortin 1 on colonic motility using an experimental model with isolated rat colon in which the blood flow and intestinal nerves were preserved. Furthermore, we assessed whether this effect was mediated by adrenergic or cholinergic nerves. METHODS: Colonic motility was measured in the proximal and distal parts of resected rat colon. The colon resected from the peritoneum was stabilized, and then urocortin 1 (13.8, 138, 277, and 1,388 pM) was administered via a blood vessel. Motility index was measured in the last 5 min of the 15 min administration of urocortin 1 and expressed as percentage change from baseline. Subsequently, the change in motility was measured by perfusing urocortin 1 in colons pretreated with phentolamine, propranolol, hexamethonium, atropine, or tetrodotoxin. RESULTS: At concentrations of 13.8, 138, 277, and 1,388 pM, urocortin 1 increased the motility of proximal colon (20.4+/-7.2%, 48.4+/-20.9%, 67.0+/-25.8%, and 64.2+/-20.9%, respectively) and the motility of distal colon (3.3+/-3.3%, 7.8+/-7.8%, 71.1+/-28.6%, and 87.4+/-32.5%, respectively). The motility induced by urocortin 1 was significantly decreased by atropine to 2.4+/-2.4% in proximal colon and 3.4+/-3.4% in distal colon (p<0.05). However, tetrodotoxin, propranolol, phentolamine, and hexamethonium did not inhibit motility. CONCLUSIONS: Urocortin 1 increased colonic motility and it is considered that this effect was directly mediated by local muscarinic cholinergic receptors.
Animals
;
Colon/*drug effects/physiology
;
Injections, Intravenous
;
Male
;
Muscle Contraction/drug effects
;
Neurotransmitter Agents/pharmacology
;
Rats
;
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
;
Receptors, Cholinergic/chemistry/metabolism
;
Urocortins/isolation & purification/*pharmacology
3.Diagnostic Accuracy of the Initial Endoscopy for Ampullary Tumors.
Hee Seung LEE ; Jong Soon JANG ; Seungho LEE ; Myeong Ho YEON ; Ki Bae KIM ; Jae Geun PARK ; Joo Young LEE ; Mi Jin KIM ; Joung Ho HAN ; Rohyun SUNG ; Seon Mee PARK
Clinical Endoscopy 2015;48(3):239-246
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ampullary tumors come in a wide variety of malignant forms. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy for ampullary tumors, and analyzed the causes of misdiagnosis. METHODS: We compared endoscopic imaging and biopsy results to final diagnoses. Types of endoscope, numbers of biopsy specimens taken, and final diagnoses were evaluated as possible factors influencing diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Final diagnoses were 19 adenocarcinomas, 18 normal or papillitis, 11 adenomas, two adenomyomas, one paraganglioma, and one neuroendocrine tumor. The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic imaging or the initial biopsy was identical (67.3%). At least one test was concordant with the final diagnosis in all except two cases. Compared with the final diagnosis, endoscopic imaging tended to show more advanced tumors, whereas the initial biopsy revealed less advanced lesions. The diagnostic accuracy of the initial biopsy was influenced by the type of endoscope used and the final diagnosis, but not by the number of biopsies taken. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy has limited accuracy in the diagnosis of ampullary tumors. However, most cases with concordant endoscopic imaging and biopsy results are identical to the final diagnosis. Therefore, in cases where both of these tests disagree, re-evaluation with a side-viewing endoscope after resolution of papillitis is required.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Adenoma
;
Adenomyoma
;
Biopsy
;
Diagnosis
;
Diagnostic Errors
;
Endoscopes
;
Endoscopy*
;
Neuroendocrine Tumors
;
Papilledema
;
Paraganglioma