To compare between the Worth 4-dot test(W4D) with polarized 4-dot test(P4D), we examined the interpretable response rate, response time, age of test failure, false positive rate and negative rate of reporting fusion in 133 patients older than 3 years of age. The interpretable response rate for W4D was 91% and for P4D 93.2%. The mean response times were 20.9 seconds for W4D versus 16.9 seconds for the P4D, the difference being statistically significant(p<0.05). The age of test failure for W4D was 4.8 years old and for P4D 3.8 years old. The false positive rate of reporting fusion for W4D was 4.5% and for P4D 8.8%. The false negative rate for W4D was 37.5%, while for P4D was 15.2%, the difference being statistically significant(p<0.05). In conclusion, the P4D was found to be less dissociative test by allowing more natural environment, and was easier, more rapid interpretable test. Therefore, the P4D may provide a more accurate assessment of a patients sensory status.
Humans ; Reaction Time

BACKGROUND: Motor weakness occurs frequently after piriformis injection and it could put patients at risk of falls. We investigated the appropriate concentration and volume of ropivacaine required to minimize motor dysfunction. METHODS: A total of 120 patients who received piriformis injection were included in this study. Piriformis injections of triamcinolone 10 mg in various concentrations (0.1%, 0.075%) and volumes (8, 10, 12 ml) of ropivacaine were administered in 20 patients, respectively. One hour after the injection, we compared motor function according to the concentrations and volumes of ropivacaine. RESULTS: There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in the occurrence of motor dysfunction according to body mass index (BMI) and the concentration of ropivacaine. No significant differences were found in terms of gender, age, weight, height, or the volume of ropivacaine. Logistic regression analysis showed that the likelihood of motor dysfunction with administration of 0.1% ropivacaine was 58.249 times greater than that with administration of 0.075% concentration (P < 0.001), while BMI did not have a significant effect on motor dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, 0.075% ropivacaine rather than 0.1% ropivacaine is appropriate in terms of reducing motor dysfunction after piriformis injection.
Accidental Falls ; Body Mass Index ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Piriformis Muscle Syndrome ; Triamcinolone

BACKGROUND: Early oral intake (EOI) associated with early recovery of normal bowel function has been shown to be an important determinant for improving patients' satisfaction. We investigated the tolerability of EOI and its effects on the recovery of bowel function after epidural anesthesia. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial of patients undergoing lower extremities surgery under epidural anesthesia was performed. A liquid drink was given to 150 patients in the EOI group 1 hours after surgery, and to 150 patients in the delayed oral intake (DOI) group 8 hours after surgery. We recorded presence of bowel sounds immediately after operation, symptoms of ileus, time to the first flatus, time to the first defecation, degree of appetite before the first meal, and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the presence of immediate postoperative bowel sounds, the degree of appetite before the first meal, mild ileus, and severe ileus between groups. Time to the first flatus and time to the first defecation in the EOI group were shorter than those of the DOI group. The patients' satisfaction in the EOI group was higher than that of the DOI group. CONCLUSIONS: For uncomplicated patients undergoing lower extremities under epidural anesthesia, beginning oral hydration as early as 1 hour after the operation is safe and well tolerated and resulting in faster recovery of bowel function and higher patients' satisfaction.
Anesthesia, Epidural ; Appetite ; Defecation ; Flatulence ; Humans ; Ileus ; Lower Extremity ; Meals ; Prospective Studies

The Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study (KIEMS), which was initiated by the Korean Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, is a collaborative multicenter study on intermittent exotropia in Korea. The KIEMS was designed to provide comprehensive information, including subjective and objective findings of intermittent exotropia in a large study population. A total of 65 strabismus specialists in 53 institutions contributed to this study, which, to date, is one of the largest clinical studies on intermittent exotropia. In this article, we provide a detailed methodology of the KIEMS to help future investigations that may use the KIEMS data.

The Korean Intermittent Exotropia Multicenter Study (KIEMS), which was initiated by the Korean Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, is a collaborative multicenter study on intermittent exotropia in Korea. The KIEMS was designed to provide comprehensive information, including subjective and objective findings of intermittent exotropia in a large study population. A total of 65 strabismus specialists in 53 institutions contributed to this study, which, to date, is one of the largest clinical studies on intermittent exotropia. In this article, we provide a detailed methodology of the KIEMS to help future investigations that may use the KIEMS data.