2.Food allergy-induced epilepsy with hyperkinetic syndrome: a case report.
Soon Young KIM ; Baek Hee LEE ; Se Hee HANG ; Yong Seung HWANG
Journal of the Korean Child Neurology Society 1993;1(1):193-199
No abstract available.
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity*
;
Epilepsy*
3.Radiologic & histologic features of hyaline membrane disease of the newborn
Seung Yon BAEK ; Kyung Hee CHOI ; Jeong Soo SUH ; Chung Sik RHEE ; Hee Seup KIM
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society 1984;20(4):820-825
This study represents the radiologic, histologic features & clinical analysis of hyaline mambrane disease in 47 newborn infants who were delivered in Ewha Womans Univ. Hospital & expired caused by repiratory distress & confirmed by autopsy , during Jan. 1981 to June, 1984. The results were as follows; 1. Classification ofradiolgraphic stage (by Wolfson's criteria); Stage III(34.1%) was the most frequent. 2. Male to female ratio was 2.4:1. 3. Method of delivery; Cesarean section (44.7%) was the highest frequency, compared with percent ofcesarean section to total delivery(29.0%). 4. Distribution of birth weight; 1.0-2.0 Kg(48.9%) was the mostfrequent. 5. Distribution of gestational period; 32-36 weeks (29.8%) was the most frequent. 6. Complication; Pulmonary hemorrhage(31.9%) was the most frequent, in order, subarachnoid hemorrhage & pneumothorax were followed.7. Final diagnosis of hyaline membrane disease was based on histo-pathologic diagnosis.
Autopsy
;
Birth Weight
;
Cesarean Section
;
Classification
;
Diagnosis
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Hyalin
;
Hyaline Membrane Disease
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Male
;
Methods
;
Pneumothorax
;
Pregnancy
;
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
4.Isolated Latissimus Dorsi Transfer versus Combined Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major Tendon Transfer for Irreparable Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Chang Hee BAEK ; Jung Gon KIM ; Bo Taek KIM ; Seung Jin KIM
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(5):761-773
Background:
Irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (IASRCTs) present significant challenges, especially in young, active patients with limited joint-preserving options. Recently, latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer and combined latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) transfer have gained attention as a potential surgical option. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of LD versus combined LDTM transfer in IASRCTs.
Methods:
In this retrospective comparative study, 53 patients with IASRCTs were analyzed after undergoing either LD transfer attached to lesser tuberosity (LT) (LD group, n = 23) or combined LDTM transfer attached to greater tuberosity (GT) (LDTM group, n = 30). Clinical evaluations included the visual analog scale score for pain, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, activities of daily living that require active internal rotation (ADLIR) scores, and subscapularis (SSC)-specific examinations. Radiographic analyses involved assessing acromiohumeral distance (AHD), Hamada grade, the rate of anterior glenohumeral subluxation reduction, and integrity of the transferred tendon.
Results:
Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and clinical scores (p < 0.001). At the 2-year follow-up, the LDTM group showed superior internal rotation strength (p < 0.001), ADLIR score (p = 0.017), and SSC-specific physical examination results (belly-press, p = 0.027; bear-hug, p = 0.031; lift-off, p = 0.032). No significant changes in AHD or Hamada grade were observed in either group. At final follow-up, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of AHD (p = 0.539) and Hamada grade (p = 0.974). Although preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation was improved in both groups, the LDTM group showed a statistically significantly higher rate of restoration compared to the LD group (p = 0.015).
Conclusions
While both LD and combined LDTM transfers for IASRCTs improved postoperative pain relief, clinical scores, and active ROM, the combined LDTM transfer attached to GT was superior to LD transfer attached to LT in terms of internal rotational strength, ADLIR score, and SSC-specific examinations. Neither group showed significant progress in cuff tear arthropathy or decreased AHD at 2-year follow-up; however, the combined LDTM transfer notably improved preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation.
5.Isolated Latissimus Dorsi Transfer versus Combined Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major Tendon Transfer for Irreparable Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Chang Hee BAEK ; Jung Gon KIM ; Bo Taek KIM ; Seung Jin KIM
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(5):761-773
Background:
Irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (IASRCTs) present significant challenges, especially in young, active patients with limited joint-preserving options. Recently, latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer and combined latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) transfer have gained attention as a potential surgical option. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of LD versus combined LDTM transfer in IASRCTs.
Methods:
In this retrospective comparative study, 53 patients with IASRCTs were analyzed after undergoing either LD transfer attached to lesser tuberosity (LT) (LD group, n = 23) or combined LDTM transfer attached to greater tuberosity (GT) (LDTM group, n = 30). Clinical evaluations included the visual analog scale score for pain, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, activities of daily living that require active internal rotation (ADLIR) scores, and subscapularis (SSC)-specific examinations. Radiographic analyses involved assessing acromiohumeral distance (AHD), Hamada grade, the rate of anterior glenohumeral subluxation reduction, and integrity of the transferred tendon.
Results:
Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and clinical scores (p < 0.001). At the 2-year follow-up, the LDTM group showed superior internal rotation strength (p < 0.001), ADLIR score (p = 0.017), and SSC-specific physical examination results (belly-press, p = 0.027; bear-hug, p = 0.031; lift-off, p = 0.032). No significant changes in AHD or Hamada grade were observed in either group. At final follow-up, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of AHD (p = 0.539) and Hamada grade (p = 0.974). Although preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation was improved in both groups, the LDTM group showed a statistically significantly higher rate of restoration compared to the LD group (p = 0.015).
Conclusions
While both LD and combined LDTM transfers for IASRCTs improved postoperative pain relief, clinical scores, and active ROM, the combined LDTM transfer attached to GT was superior to LD transfer attached to LT in terms of internal rotational strength, ADLIR score, and SSC-specific examinations. Neither group showed significant progress in cuff tear arthropathy or decreased AHD at 2-year follow-up; however, the combined LDTM transfer notably improved preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation.
6.Isolated Latissimus Dorsi Transfer versus Combined Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major Tendon Transfer for Irreparable Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Chang Hee BAEK ; Jung Gon KIM ; Bo Taek KIM ; Seung Jin KIM
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(5):761-773
Background:
Irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (IASRCTs) present significant challenges, especially in young, active patients with limited joint-preserving options. Recently, latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer and combined latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) transfer have gained attention as a potential surgical option. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of LD versus combined LDTM transfer in IASRCTs.
Methods:
In this retrospective comparative study, 53 patients with IASRCTs were analyzed after undergoing either LD transfer attached to lesser tuberosity (LT) (LD group, n = 23) or combined LDTM transfer attached to greater tuberosity (GT) (LDTM group, n = 30). Clinical evaluations included the visual analog scale score for pain, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, activities of daily living that require active internal rotation (ADLIR) scores, and subscapularis (SSC)-specific examinations. Radiographic analyses involved assessing acromiohumeral distance (AHD), Hamada grade, the rate of anterior glenohumeral subluxation reduction, and integrity of the transferred tendon.
Results:
Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and clinical scores (p < 0.001). At the 2-year follow-up, the LDTM group showed superior internal rotation strength (p < 0.001), ADLIR score (p = 0.017), and SSC-specific physical examination results (belly-press, p = 0.027; bear-hug, p = 0.031; lift-off, p = 0.032). No significant changes in AHD or Hamada grade were observed in either group. At final follow-up, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of AHD (p = 0.539) and Hamada grade (p = 0.974). Although preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation was improved in both groups, the LDTM group showed a statistically significantly higher rate of restoration compared to the LD group (p = 0.015).
Conclusions
While both LD and combined LDTM transfers for IASRCTs improved postoperative pain relief, clinical scores, and active ROM, the combined LDTM transfer attached to GT was superior to LD transfer attached to LT in terms of internal rotational strength, ADLIR score, and SSC-specific examinations. Neither group showed significant progress in cuff tear arthropathy or decreased AHD at 2-year follow-up; however, the combined LDTM transfer notably improved preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation.
7.Isolated Latissimus Dorsi Transfer versus Combined Latissimus Dorsi and Teres Major Tendon Transfer for Irreparable Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Chang Hee BAEK ; Jung Gon KIM ; Bo Taek KIM ; Seung Jin KIM
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2024;16(5):761-773
Background:
Irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tears (IASRCTs) present significant challenges, especially in young, active patients with limited joint-preserving options. Recently, latissimus dorsi (LD) transfer and combined latissimus dorsi and teres major (LDTM) transfer have gained attention as a potential surgical option. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of LD versus combined LDTM transfer in IASRCTs.
Methods:
In this retrospective comparative study, 53 patients with IASRCTs were analyzed after undergoing either LD transfer attached to lesser tuberosity (LT) (LD group, n = 23) or combined LDTM transfer attached to greater tuberosity (GT) (LDTM group, n = 30). Clinical evaluations included the visual analog scale score for pain, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, activities of daily living that require active internal rotation (ADLIR) scores, and subscapularis (SSC)-specific examinations. Radiographic analyses involved assessing acromiohumeral distance (AHD), Hamada grade, the rate of anterior glenohumeral subluxation reduction, and integrity of the transferred tendon.
Results:
Postoperatively, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and clinical scores (p < 0.001). At the 2-year follow-up, the LDTM group showed superior internal rotation strength (p < 0.001), ADLIR score (p = 0.017), and SSC-specific physical examination results (belly-press, p = 0.027; bear-hug, p = 0.031; lift-off, p = 0.032). No significant changes in AHD or Hamada grade were observed in either group. At final follow-up, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of AHD (p = 0.539) and Hamada grade (p = 0.974). Although preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation was improved in both groups, the LDTM group showed a statistically significantly higher rate of restoration compared to the LD group (p = 0.015).
Conclusions
While both LD and combined LDTM transfers for IASRCTs improved postoperative pain relief, clinical scores, and active ROM, the combined LDTM transfer attached to GT was superior to LD transfer attached to LT in terms of internal rotational strength, ADLIR score, and SSC-specific examinations. Neither group showed significant progress in cuff tear arthropathy or decreased AHD at 2-year follow-up; however, the combined LDTM transfer notably improved preoperative anterior glenohumeral subluxation.
8.Primary malignant melanoma of the esophagus.
Seung Hwan LEE ; Yeon Hee PARK ; Baek Yeol RYOO ; Heung Tae KIM ; Sook Hyang JEONG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2004;66(2):234-235
No abstract available.
Esophagus*
;
Melanoma*
9.The Acute Effects of Timolol and Betaxolol on the Peripapillary Retinal and Optic Nerve Head Microcirculation.
Seung Hee BAEK ; Dong Myung KIM
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 1996;37(8):1315-1320
We investigated the acute effects of timolol (beta-adrenergic non-selective) and betaxolol (beta1-adrenergic selective) on the retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) microcirculation in healthy subjects with Heidelberg Retina Flowmeter (HRF). Intraocular pressure (IOP), heart rate, blood pressure, and retinal and ONH microcirculation were measured in 7 healthy subjects (3 F/ 4 M; mean age=27.2 +/- 1.1 years) before and 90 minutes after instillation of each drug on separate occasions at 2 weeks apart. Volume, flow, and velocity of microcirculation in the peripapillary retina and neural rim of ONH were measured using HRF. Both drugs significantly reduced IOP (Wilcoxon signed rank test; p=.03) without affecting heart rate or blood pressure. It had no effect on the volume, flow, and velocity of blood flow in the peripapillary retina and ONH (Wilcoxon signed rank test; p>.1), From the above results, we concluded that both timolol and betaxolol did not alter retinal and ONH microcirculation.
Betaxolol*
;
Blood Pressure
;
Flowmeters
;
Heart Rate
;
Intraocular Pressure
;
Microcirculation
;
Optic Disk*
;
Optic Nerve*
;
Retina
;
Retinaldehyde*
;
Timolol*
10.Clinical Effects of Newfactan in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Journal of the Korean Society of Neonatology 2001;8(1):65-71
PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate the clinical effects of Newfactan in the treatment of moderate to severe respiratory distress syndrome. METHODS: There were enrolled 20 preterm infants who were diagnosed as grade III or grade IV respiratory distress syndrome at Kosin University Gospel Hospital from July 1997 to May 2000. All of these preterm infants were treated for rescue. To investigate the improvement of respiratory parameters we used FiO2, MAP, a/APO2 ratio, OI. RESULTS: Newfactan was administered to the patients at 7.2+/-7.4 hours (range 1.5- 32) after birth and 7 cases (35%) were administered one dose, 8 (40%) were administered two doses and 5 (25%) were administered three doses. The dose interval from first to second dose was 9.2+/-12.3 hours (range 5-46). The dose interval from second to third dose was 27.6+/-5.4 hours (range 21-35). The need of FiO2 showed decreased tendency especially between 4 to 6 hour after administration (P<0.05). PaCO2 and OI were decreased and a/APO2 ratio was increased after administration (P<0.05). MAP was not changed statistically (P>0.05). There were 41 complications and outcomes including PDA, sepsis, pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage, BPD, ROP, and necrotizing enterocolitis. CONCLUSION: The clinical effects of Newfactan in the treatment of grade III or grade IV respiratory distress syndrome were significant in improving FiO2, PaCO2, a/APO2 ratio and OI.
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Infant, Newborn
;
Infant, Premature
;
Parturition
;
Pneumothorax
;
Sepsis