No Abstract Available.
Adult* ; Capsulorhexis* ; Cataract* ; Follow-Up Studies* ; Humans

To determine whether liposome-encapsulated tobramycin is less toxic than commercial tobramycin and the threshold dose of liposome-encapsulated tobramycin required to produce toxic reactions when it was injected intravitreally in rabbit, we used liposome-encapsulated tobramycin, tobramycin in PBS, mixture of tobramycin and liposome-encapsulated saline, liposome-encapsulated saline and normal saline respectively. After those were injected, we examined the histologic findings and the functional changes of the retina. The final results are summarized as follows; 1. When tobramycin was injected intravitreally alone, there was no toxic reaction of the retina histologically and functionally with dosage 500 micro gram of commercial tobramycin, but dosage more than 750 micro gram produced toxic reaction. 2. When liposome-encapsulated tobramycin was injected intravitreally, there was toxic reaction of the retina histologically and functionally with dosage 1500 micro gram of tobramycin. 3. When a mixture of tobramycin and liposome-encapsulated saline was injected intravitreally, there was similar toxic reaction as tobramycin used alone with dosage more than 750 micro gram of tobramycin. Liposome-encapsulated saline and normal saline did not produce toxic reaction. The above results indicate that liposome encapsulation markedly reduces the ocular toxicity of tobramycin and that as mnch as dosage 1000 micro gram of liposome-encapsulated tobramycin may be tolerated by the intravitreal route in the rabbit eye. Therefore, the results of this study offer some hope that we may use the method of intravitreal injection of liposome-encapsulated tobramycin safely and effeciently for the treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis in near future.
Endophthalmitis ; Hope ; Intravitreal Injections ; Liposomes ; Rabbits* ; Retina* ; Tobramycin*

No abstract available.
Budd-Chiari Syndrome* ; Vena Cava, Inferior*

We inspected reliability of A-constant of AMO SI-30NB by comparing target diopter and actual postoperative refractive status. Group 1 comprised 191 eyes which were implanted AMO PhacoFlex SI-30NB with corneal incision. Group 2 comprised 45 eyes implanted Pharmacia 812C with scleral incisions. Group 3 comprised 17 eyes implanted AMO OgaciFlex SI-30NB with corneal incision. Refraction was performed on post operative day 1, day 5, day 14, 1 month, and 3 month. It revealed hyperopic shift of 0.31 to 0.40 diopter compared to the target diopters in both Group 1 and Group 3 and no statistical difference was found between two groups(p value>0.05). On the other hand, Group 2 were statistically significant(p value<0.01). We attempted mathematical modelling of this phenomenon and the cause of hyperopylene haptics, structural weakness of haptic-optic junction, and the structure of SI-30NB itself.
Hand ; Models, Theoretical

No abstract available.
Meningitis, Aseptic*

The potential acuity meter(PAM) has been reported to be a useful instrument for predicting postoperative visual acuity after cataract extraction surgery. Forty nine eyes were tested with PAM before surgery, and the best postopertive visual acuity was obtained. The PAM accurately predicted the postoperative visual acuity to within three lines in 90.0% of the cases. When the test is in error, the tendency is for the PAM to underestimate the final acuity rather than to overestimate. Especially under undilated pupil, in dense cataracts (<20/200),and,in posterior subcapsular and cortical cataracts, the PAM tends to underestimate further.
Cataract Extraction ; Cataract* ; Pupil ; Visual Acuity*

Contrast sensitivity measurements were obtained from 45 patients with noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus(NIDDM) who had normal Snellen acuity and minimal or no visible diabetic retinopathy. Contrast sensitivity thresholds were determined with a convenient microcomputer driven display system developed by the members of Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine. The data obtained from each diabetic. patients were compared with the normal contrast sensitivity of Korean(Lee et al, 1984). We found that, 1) The patients with NIDDM and no retinopathy had abnormal contrast sensitivity at two spatial frequencies (0.4 and 27.4 LP/D). 2) The patients with NIDDM and background retinopathy had abnormal contrast sensitivity at nearly all spatial frequencies tested. We also found a dissociation of Snellen acuity and contrast sensitivity and that contrast sensitivity can be used as an early index of changes in the retina not demonstrated by measurements of visual acuity.
Contrast Sensitivity* ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; Humans ; Microcomputers ; Ophthalmology ; Retina ; Visual Acuity

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical results of a AMO Array mutifocal lens. METHOD: we performed a prospective clinical trial of 20 bilateral cataract patients for at least 6 months. RESULT: Mean monocular uncorrected distance acuity(Snellen) was 0.75, which increased to 0.9 with best correction. Mean biocular uncorrected distance acuity was 0.85,which increased to 1.0 with best correction. Mean monocular near acuity was 0.62, which reached 0.88 with best correction. Mean biocular near acuity was 0.71, which reached 1.00 with best correction. Mean contrast sensitivities were within normal range for all spacial frequencies. In glare discomfort, 10 patients had no complaint, 7 patients had no idea, and only 3 patients had some problem. Reading newspaper without glasses was achieved by 28 of 40 eyes(70%) and 15 of 20 patients(75%). CONCLUSION: AMO Array lens can be used as a method of treatment of presbyopia, when combined with correct biometry.
Biometry ; Cataract ; Eyeglasses ; Glare ; Glass ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular* ; Periodicals ; Presbyopia ; Prospective Studies ; Reference Values

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical results of unilateral implantation of AMO Array(r) intraocular lens in unilateral or bilateral cataract patients with minimum follow-up of 6 months. METHODS: This prospective study comprised two groups of 20 eyes each: one with AMO Array(r) intraocular lens(multi group) and the other with monofocal silicone intraocular lens(mono group). Main outcome measures were Snellen distance visual acuities; near acuities with Birkhauser reading chart. RESULTS: The difference between two groups in mean distance visual acuity was not statistically significant. Both monocular and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity in the multi group were significantly better than mono group. Four of 20 patients(20%) in monofocal group and 13 of 20 patients(65%) in multifocal group noticed light sensation(glare, halo etc.) after surgery, with the majority not being bothered by all of these. More than 90% patients were satisfied after surgery in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection, near vision without spectacles was functionally acceptable in a majority of unilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation cases. And, there was no significant problem in unilateral implantation of AMO Array intraocular lens. AMO Array lens can be used in unilateral cataract surgery.
Cataract ; Eyeglasses ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular ; Lenses, Intraocular* ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Patient Selection ; Prospective Studies ; Silicones ; Telescopes ; Visual Acuity

The tear film break-up time test is a useful diagnostic test for dry eye syndrome,but it shows a wide range of results in normal subjects according to many factors, especially the methods of measuring it. We studied the factors having some influences on B.U.T. and tried to find out a standard method of measuring B.U.T. in normal subjects. The results were as follows: 1. The subjects were healthy without any ocular disease or symptoms. Total subjects were 200 persons, 400 eyes. 2. The standard method of measuring B.U.T. was as follows: a drop of 0.125% sodium fluorescein was applied into the conjunctival sac and the patient was allowed to blink for at least 1-2 minutes. The tear film was then scanned without holding the lids, using the slit lamp beam, 4-5mm in width. 3. The mean B.U.T. measured by the standard method was 20.35 +/- 6.45 sec in normal subjects. 4. The mean B.U.T. was 18.17 +/- 8.02'sec in the group using fluorescein paper, 9.68 +/- 6.19 sec in the group blinking just 4-5 times,16.54 +/- 8.32 sec in the group measured holding the lids with the fingers, and 18.36 +/- 7.95 sec in the group using a broad beam. 5. There were statistically significant decreases of B.U.T. in the group blinking just 4-5 times and in the group measured holding the lids with the fingers.
Blinking ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine ; Fingers ; Fluorescein ; Humans ; Tears*