BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In-stent coronary restenosis remains one of major clinical problems in percutaneous coronary intervention. Long stent has been known to be associated with high restenosis rate. Predictive clinical and angiographic factors were analyzed after long coronary stenting. METHODS: One hundred four patients (57.2+/-9.6 year-old, 105 male) who underwent long coronary stent implantation and follow-up coronary angiogram, out of 237 patients implanted long coronary stents between June 1996 and January 1999 at Chonnam National University Hospital. RESULTS: Primary success rate was 100%. Lesion length was 18.5 +/- 9.2 mm and the length of stent was 27.3 +/- 6.1 mm. Mean duration of clinical follow-up and follow-up coronary angiogram was 20.1+/-6.8 months and 6.3+/-2.7 months respectively. Restenosis rate according to follow-up coronary angiogram was 42.5% (57/134). Clinical variables of age, sex, clinical diagnosis, risk factors, and angiographic variables of target artery and lesion types, indications for stenting, stent types, reference diameter, lesion length, minimal luminal diameter, and acute gain were not related with late stent restenosis. Diameter stenosis before stenting was higher in the group with restenosis (81.9+/-16.9 %) than in group without restenosis (71.1+/-18.5%; p<0.05), and lower lower in the group with restenosis (-7.6+/-15.7%) and in the group without restenosis (5.6+/-22.4%; p<0.05) after stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Primary success rate was comparable. Severe luminal stenosis before stenting and overdilation after stenting are associated with restenosis after long coronary stenting.
Arteries ; Constriction, Pathologic ; Coronary Restenosis ; Diagnosis ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Jeollanam-do ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Phenobarbital ; Risk Factors ; Stents*

Purpose: We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and learning curve of extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and introduced innovative surgical techniques to maintain the instrument positions during the procedures. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 100 patients underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP at our institution from December 2021 to April 2023. The procedures were performed by an experienced urology surgeon utilizing two surgical techniques for dissecting the posterior aspect of the prostate—“changing instrument roles” and “using camera inversion”—to prevent positional shifts between the camera and instruments. Results: The mean operation time for SP-RARP was 93.58 minutes, and the mean console time was 65.16 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss during the procedures was 109.30 mL. No cases necessitated conversion to multi-port robot, laparoscopy, or open surgery, and there were no major complications during the hospital stay or in the short-term follow-up. Early outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy indicated a biochemical recurrence rate of 4.0% over a mean follow-up duration of 6.40 months, with continence and potency recovery rates of 92.3% and 55.8%, respectively. Analysis of the learning curve showed no significant differences in operation time, console time, and positive surgical margin rates between the initial and latter 50 cases. Conclusions Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in skilled hands.Continued accrual of cases is essential for future comparisons of SP-RARP with multiport approaches.

Purpose: We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and learning curve of extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and introduced innovative surgical techniques to maintain the instrument positions during the procedures. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 100 patients underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP at our institution from December 2021 to April 2023. The procedures were performed by an experienced urology surgeon utilizing two surgical techniques for dissecting the posterior aspect of the prostate—“changing instrument roles” and “using camera inversion”—to prevent positional shifts between the camera and instruments. Results: The mean operation time for SP-RARP was 93.58 minutes, and the mean console time was 65.16 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss during the procedures was 109.30 mL. No cases necessitated conversion to multi-port robot, laparoscopy, or open surgery, and there were no major complications during the hospital stay or in the short-term follow-up. Early outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy indicated a biochemical recurrence rate of 4.0% over a mean follow-up duration of 6.40 months, with continence and potency recovery rates of 92.3% and 55.8%, respectively. Analysis of the learning curve showed no significant differences in operation time, console time, and positive surgical margin rates between the initial and latter 50 cases. Conclusions Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in skilled hands.Continued accrual of cases is essential for future comparisons of SP-RARP with multiport approaches.

Purpose: We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and learning curve of extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and introduced innovative surgical techniques to maintain the instrument positions during the procedures. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 100 patients underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP at our institution from December 2021 to April 2023. The procedures were performed by an experienced urology surgeon utilizing two surgical techniques for dissecting the posterior aspect of the prostate—“changing instrument roles” and “using camera inversion”—to prevent positional shifts between the camera and instruments. Results: The mean operation time for SP-RARP was 93.58 minutes, and the mean console time was 65.16 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss during the procedures was 109.30 mL. No cases necessitated conversion to multi-port robot, laparoscopy, or open surgery, and there were no major complications during the hospital stay or in the short-term follow-up. Early outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy indicated a biochemical recurrence rate of 4.0% over a mean follow-up duration of 6.40 months, with continence and potency recovery rates of 92.3% and 55.8%, respectively. Analysis of the learning curve showed no significant differences in operation time, console time, and positive surgical margin rates between the initial and latter 50 cases. Conclusions Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in skilled hands.Continued accrual of cases is essential for future comparisons of SP-RARP with multiport approaches.

Purpose: We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and learning curve of extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARP) and introduced innovative surgical techniques to maintain the instrument positions during the procedures. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 100 patients underwent extraperitoneal SP-RARP at our institution from December 2021 to April 2023. The procedures were performed by an experienced urology surgeon utilizing two surgical techniques for dissecting the posterior aspect of the prostate—“changing instrument roles” and “using camera inversion”—to prevent positional shifts between the camera and instruments. Results: The mean operation time for SP-RARP was 93.58 minutes, and the mean console time was 65.16 minutes. The mean estimated blood loss during the procedures was 109.30 mL. No cases necessitated conversion to multi-port robot, laparoscopy, or open surgery, and there were no major complications during the hospital stay or in the short-term follow-up. Early outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy indicated a biochemical recurrence rate of 4.0% over a mean follow-up duration of 6.40 months, with continence and potency recovery rates of 92.3% and 55.8%, respectively. Analysis of the learning curve showed no significant differences in operation time, console time, and positive surgical margin rates between the initial and latter 50 cases. Conclusions Extraperitoneal SP-RARP is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer in skilled hands.Continued accrual of cases is essential for future comparisons of SP-RARP with multiport approaches.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The delay between the onset of myocardial infarction symptoms and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important prognostic factor in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). We reviewed this delay in patients with STEMI and analyzed clinical outcomes. METHODS: The study enrolled 3,399 patients (age, 61.4 +/- 12.8 years; 25.6% women) with STEMI who underwent primary PCI within 12 hours of symptom onset between October 2005 and February 2008 from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. The patients were divided into two groups according to the symptom-to-balloon time: group I (< or = 3 hours, n = 955) and group II (> 3 hours, n = 2444). The in-hospital mortality rates and 1-year mortality and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean time interval from the onset of symptoms to arrival at the emergency room (ER) was 188.0 +/- 133.6 minutes (median, 152 minutes). The mean time interval from the ER to reperfusion (door-to-balloon time) was 97.8 +/- 67.9 minutes (median, 80 minutes). The mean time interval from the onset of symptoms to reperfusion (symptom-to-balloon time) was 285.8 +/- 146.2 minutes (median 250 minutes). The in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in group I as compared with group II (3.6% versus 5.2%, p = 0.044). The 1-year mortality rate was also significantly lower in group I (4.7% versus 7.2%, p = 0.012), while the 1-year MACE rate was not significantly different between groups (17.9% versus 20.4%, p = 0.179). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is a significant pre-hospital time delay in patients with STEMI in Korea and this time delay is associated with increased 1-year mortality.
Angioplasty ; Emergencies ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Korea ; Myocardial Infarction ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Reperfusion ; Time Factors