BACKGROUND: Free light chain (FLC) is widely used to evaluate B-cell proliferative diseases. Herein, we estimated the clinical usefulness of serum FLC in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled. We performed FLC analysis, protein electrophoresis (PEP), and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). FLC was measured using Toshiba 200 FR Neo with FREELITE(TM), and kappa/lambda (kappa/lambda) ratio was calculated. We compared these parameters in 41 patients with increased FLC before and after bortezomib treatment. Complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of monoclonal (M) protein in serum and/or urine as measured by IFE. Partial response (PR) was defined as > or =50% reduction of serum M protein. Early objective response (EOR) included both CR and PR. Minimal response (MR) was defined as 25-49% reduction of M protein and stable disease (SD) as <25% reduction. RESULTS: Forty-one (80.4%) of the 51 patients studied revealed increment of FLC and the five patients with no increment revealed an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio. Especially, all of the light chain myeloma and non-secretory myeloma showed increased FLC concentrations. Among the patients with EOR, 72.4% (21/29) showed a normal or subnormal FLC concentration after the first cycle of treatment. Otherwise, PEP and IFE normalized in 24.1% (7/29) and 24.1% (7/29), respectively. The ratio of decreased FLC after the first cycle of treatment was significantly different between EOR and other response groups (MR, SD) (90.6% vs 51.8%, P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: FLC was considered as a good diagnostic method in complement with PEP and IFE in MM, especially in light chain myeloma or non-secretory myeloma. Moreover, FLC is a useful monitoring tool because it reflects therapy results more rapidly owing to a short serum half-life.
Adult ; Aged ; Boronic Acids/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoelectrophoresis ; Immunoglobulin Light Chains/*blood/urine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Myeloma/*diagnosis/therapy ; Pyrazines/therapeutic use ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

BACKGROUND: For the detection of HLA antibodies, solid-phase tests using purified HLA antigens are increasingly used. In this study, we analyzed the panel reactive antibody (PRA) test results using ELISA and Luminex methods, and the results were compared with those of crossmatch test. METHODS: A total of 111 sera including 90 sera from kidney transplanted patients were tested. ELISA-PRA was performed using Lambda Antigen Tray Class I and II Mixed kits (One Lambda Inc., USA) and additional test was performed to identify HLA specificities. Luminex-PRA tests were performed using LABScreen Mixed kits (One Lambda Inc., USA) and LIFECODES LifeScreen Deluxe kits (Tepnel Co., USA). RESULTS: The positive rates of PRA were higher in Tepnel (P=0.006) and One Lambda Luminex (P<0.001) methods than ELISA, without significant difference between two Luminex methods (P=0.087). The overall concordance rate among the three PRA tests was 62.2% (69/111). The positive and negative predictive values of PRA tests for the flow cytometric crossmatch were 33.3-45.7% and 85.7-89.5%, respectively. Of the two Luminex methods, One Lambda showed higher positive rate than Tepnel for the detection of class I antibodies. The sensitivity of pretransplant PRA for the detection of posttransplant acute rejection episodes was higher in Luminex (P=0.007 for Tepnel, P=0.003 for One lambda) than ELISA method. CONCLUSIONS: Different methods used to detect HLA antibodies showed discrepant results. As the Luminex method was more sensitive than ELISA for the detection of HLA antibodies, it can be used as a routine test in the transplantation laboratory.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/*methods ; Flow Cytometry ; Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/*immunology ; Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/*immunology ; Humans ; Isoantibodies/*blood ; Kidney Transplantation/immunology ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sensitivity and Specificity

Background: and Purpose: Orbital and cranial form of idiopathic inflammatory pseudotumors (IIPs) are rare disorders with heterogeneous clinical presentations. Corticosteroids have been the first-line treatment for IIPs, but they are not always effective. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of three patients with orbital or cranial form of IIP who were treated with tacrolimus as an adjuvant treatment. Results: The three patients showed favorable outcomes with the addition of tacrolimus, which is a calcineurin inhibitor that inhibits T-cell activation and T-cell-dependent B-cell activation. Conclusions Tacrolimus may be a safe and effective immunosuppressant for refractory or relapsing form of orbital or cranial IIPs.