No abstract available.
Body Mass Index* ; Critical Illness* ; Humans

No abstract available.
Body Mass Index ; Critical Illness ; Humans

BACKGROUND: Although cisatracurium has many advantages in anesthetic practices, the best choice of a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent that can replace succinylcholine is rocuronium. However, it is reported that remifentanil with propofol might provide reliable intubating condition, even without a neuromuscular blocking agent; therefore, it might improve the intubating condition with cisatracurium. This study examined intubating conditions after administering rocuronium or cisatracurium in a rapid sequence induction with remifentanil-propofol. METHODS: Fifty two ASA physical status 1 or 2 adult patients scheduled for an elective surgery were enrolled in a randomized double-blinded trial. Anesthesia was induced in all patients with propofol 2.0 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.5 microgram/kg, administered over 60 seconds. Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg (3 x ED95, R group, n = 23) or cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg (3 x ED95, C group, n = 29) was administered after the induction sequence. Laryngoscopy was attempted when the anesthesiologist thought it was 90 seconds after drug administration and appropriate time for intubation. The examiner, another anesthesiologist, recorded the exact time to intubation and suppression of maximal T1 on TOF. The intubating condition was assessed by the first anesthesiologist, as excellent, good, poor or not possible. RESULTS: The best time to laryngoscopy was predicted by measuring TOF and was found to be significantly longer in the C group (197 +/- 53 s) than in the R group (102 +/- 49 s) (P value < 0.05). However, time to larygoscopy, intubating condition during the laryngoscopy, and hemodynamic changes after intubation was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite fundamentally slower onset time, cisatracurium can provide quite good intubating conditions, which were comparable to those achieved with equipotent doses of rocuronium, which is more expensive in anesthesia inducted with remifentanil and propofol.
Adult ; Androstanols ; Anesthesia ; Atracurium ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Intubation ; Laryngoscopy ; Neuromuscular Blockade ; Piperidines ; Propofol ; Succinylcholine

BACKGROUND: Myocardial ischemia is known to depress systolic and diastolic functions for a prolonged period of time. Dobutamine and epinephrine are frequently administered to improve myocardial function during cardiac surgery. The vascular response to vasopressors might be altered by ischemia and reperfusion, since alterations in vascular control mechanisms have been demonstrated even after a short period of ischemia. The present study was aimed to investigate the effects of dobutamine and epinephrine on regional and global myocardial functions, coronary blood flow (CBF) and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) in normal and stunned myocardium in an open-chest canine model. METHODS: Forty-eight dogs were acutely instrumented under enflurane anesthesia to measure aortic and left ventricular pressures, and pulmonary (cardiac output) and left anterior descending (LAD) blood flows via a Doppler flowmeter, and a subendocardial segment length in the region supplied by the LAD. In series 1, incremental doses of dobutamine (1, 2, 5, 10microgram/kg/min, n = 9) or epinephrine (0.02, 0.04, 0.1, 0.2microgram/kg/min, n = 10) were infused intravenously (IV) for 10 min before (normal) and after 15 min of LAD occlusion and subsequent 1 hr-reperfusion (stunned). In series 2, incremental doses of dobutamine (50, 125, 250, 375 ng/mL of LAD flow, n = 14) or epinephrine (4, 10, 20, 30 ng/mL of LAD flow, n = 15) were infused directly into the LAD (IC) for 3 5 min before (normal) and after myocardial ischemia (stunned). Segment shortening (%SS), as an index of regional myocardial contractility, and the peak segment lengthening rate (dL/dt max), as an index of regional diastolic function, were evaluated. Simultaneous arterial and coronary venous contents of oxygen and lactate were measured to calculate MVO2 and oxygen (EO2) and lactate extraction (Elac) ratios during IV or IC infusions of epinephrine or dobutamine. Effectiveness of metabolic vasodilation was determined from EO2. RESULTS: IV or IC infusions of dobutamine or epinephrine before ischemia resulted in dose-dependent increases in mechanical functions (%SS and dL/dt max) and MVO2. These changes were accompanied by parallel increases in CBF resulting in unaltered EO2 with an infusion of dobutamine, while CBF increased more than MVO2 with epinephrine, resulting in decreased EO2. After the ischemia and reperfusion, %SS and dL/dt max were depressed and Elac was reduced, but similar mechanical responses (%SS and dL/dt max) to both dobutamine & epinephrine were observed. Also, in the stunned myocardium, CBF increased in parallel with mechanical function and MVO2 with either IC or IV dobutamine, resulting in an unaltered EO2. However, IC but not IV epinephrine did not affect EO2, suggesting abolishment of its direct vasodilating effect in stunned myocardium. In addition, IC epinephrine infusion further decreased Elac, while IC dobutamine did not affect it in stunned myocardium. During IV infusions, dobutamine caused a dose-dependent increase in the heart rate but epinephrine did not affect it, despite the comparable increase in cardiac index and mean aortic pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that dobutamine and epinephrine exert similar positive inotropic and lusitropic effects in normal and stunned myocardium in dogs. However, epinephrine causes direct coronary vasodilation in normal myocardium, but it does not directly affect coronary vascular tone in stunned myocardium. In addition, epinephrine infusion dose-dependently depresses Elac in stunned myocardium. In contrast, dobutamine affects neither direct coronary vascular tone nor Elac regardless of ischemia and reperfusion injury.
Anesthesia ; Animals ; Arterial Pressure ; Dobutamine* ; Dogs* ; Enflurane ; Epinephrine* ; Flowmeters ; Heart Rate ; Ischemia ; Lactic Acid ; Myocardial Ischemia ; Myocardial Stunning* ; Myocardium ; Oxygen Consumption ; Oxygen* ; Reperfusion ; Reperfusion Injury ; Thoracic Surgery ; Vasodilation ; Ventricular Pressure

BACKGROUND: Cystoscopic procedure is a very common practice in the field of urology due to its ability to survey the bladder for a variety of indications. However, patients who undergo cystoscopy feel intense pain and discomfort. This study investigated the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) of remifentanil in preventing cystoscope insertion pain under sedation using dexmedetomidine. METHODS: The study was prospectively conducted on 18 male patients, aged 18 to 65. Remifentail infusion was initiated together with dexmedetomidine, and started at a dose of 2.4 ng/ml on the first patient. The effect-site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil for each subsequent patient was determined by the previous patient's response using Dixon's up-and-down method with an interval of 0.3 ng/ml. Patients received a loading dose of 1.0 microg/kg dexmedetomidine over 10 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.6 microg/kg/hr. After the patient's OAA/S score (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale) reached 3-4, and the Ce of remifentanil reached target concentration, the urologist was allowed to insert the cystoscope and the pain responses were observed. RESULTS: The effect-site concentration of remifentanil required to prevent cystoscope insertion pain in 50% of patients under sedation using dexmedetomidine was 1.30 +/- 0.12 ng/ml by Dixon's up-and-down method. The logistic regression curve of the probability of response showed that the EC50 and EC95 values (95% confidence limits) of remifentanil were 1.33 ng/ml (1.12-1.52 ng/ml) and 1.58 ng/ml (1.44-2.48 ng/ml), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cystoscopic procedure can be carried out successfully without any pain or adverse effects by optimal remifentanil effect-site concentration (EC50, 1.33 ng/ml; EC95, 1.58 ng/ ml) combined with sedation using dexmedetomidine.
Cystoscopes ; Cystoscopy* ; Dexmedetomidine* ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Urinary Bladder ; Urology

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines have been used preoperatively as part of an anesthesia regimen to attenuate the anxiety of patients. In this study, we aimed to examine the effect of oral triazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, on anxiety, sedation, and amnesia. METHODS: Ninety patients, aged 20–55 years, were randomly assigned to receive no premedication, or to receive triazolam 0.25 mg or 0.375 mg 1 h before anesthesia. Anxiety score, sedation score, blood pressure, heart rate and psychomotor performance were measured on the evening before surgery and on the day of surgery. Additional tests of psychomotor performance were performed in the postanesthesia care unit and on the next day of surgery. The occurrence of amnesia, bispectral index (BIS), recovery profiles and patient satisfaction with overall anesthesia care were also evaluated. RESULTS: Changes in the anxiety and sedation scores on the day of surgery were not significantly different among groups, whereas the increases in systolic blood pressure and heart rate were significantly less in both triazolam groups. The triazolam groups both showed a higher incidence of high satisfaction scores (≥ 2). The two triazolam groups also showed similar outcomes, except for a dose-dependent increase in the number of patients with amnesia and BIS values < 90. Delayed recovery from general anesthesia and psychomotor impairment were not observed in the triazolam groups. CONCLUSIONS: Triazolam 0.25 mg or 0.375 mg reduced the hemodynamic changes associated with anxiety, produced potent amnesia, and improved patient satisfaction. We suggest that triazolam can be used effectively as anesthetic premedication in adults.
Adult ; Amnesia* ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General* ; Anxiety* ; Benzodiazepines ; Blood Pressure ; Heart Rate ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Incidence ; Patient Satisfaction ; Premedication* ; Psychomotor Disorders ; Psychomotor Performance ; Triazolam*

BACKGROUND: Triazolam has similar pharmacological properties as other benzodiazepines and is generally used as a sedative to treat insomnia. Alprazolam represents a possible alternative to midazolam for the premedication of surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anxiolytic, sedative, and amnestic properties of triazolam and alprazolam as pre-anesthetic medications. METHODS: Sixty adult patients were randomly allocated to receive oral triazolam 0.25 mg or alprazolam 0.5 mg one hour prior to surgery. A structured assessment interview was performed in the operating room (OR), the recovery room, and the ward. The levels of anxiety and sedation were assessed on a 7-point scale (0 = relaxation to 6 = very severe anxiety) and a 5-point scale (0 = alert to 4 = lack of responsiveness), respectively. The psychomotor performance was estimated using a digit symbol substitution test. As a memory test, we asked the patients the day after the surgery if they remembered being moved from the ward to the OR, and what object we had shown them in the OR. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to anxiety and sedation. The postoperative interviews showed that 22.2% of the triazolam-treated patients experienced a loss of memory in the OR, against a 0% memory loss in the alprazolam-treated patients. In comparison with alprazolam 0.5 mg, triazolam 0.25 mg produced a higher incidence of amnesia without causing respiratory depression. CONCLUSIONS: Oral triazolam 0.25 mg can be an effective preanesthetic medication for psychomotor performance.
Adult ; Alprazolam* ; Amnesia ; Anesthesia, General* ; Anxiety ; Benzodiazepines ; Humans ; Incidence ; Memory ; Memory Disorders ; Midazolam ; Operating Rooms ; Preanesthetic Medication ; Premedication* ; Psychomotor Performance ; Recovery Room ; Relaxation ; Respiratory Insufficiency ; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders ; Triazolam*

BACKGROUND: We examined the effects of amrinone and dobutamine on regional mechanical function, coronary blood flow (CBF), and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2) in normal and stunned myocardium in an open-chest canine model. METHODS: Dogs were instrumented to measure aortic and left ventricular pressures, pulmonary and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary blood flows, and subendocardial segment length in the region supplied by LAD. Incremental doses of either amrinone (2~10microgram/ml of LAD flow, n=13) or dobutamine (0.05~0.375microgram/ml of LAD flow, n=14) were directly infused into a coronary artery before (normal) and after a 15 min of LAD occlusion and subsequent 30 min-reperfusion (stunned). Percent segment shortening (%SS) and percent post-systolic shortening (%PSS) were evaluated. Myocardial extraction of oxygen (EO2) and lactate (Elac) was calculated. RESULTS: Amrinone or dobutamine in the normal myocardium caused dose-dependent increases in %SS that were comparable (range, 20~40%) but had no effect on %PSS. MVO2 increased in parallel with %SS for both amrinone and dobutamine. With amrinone, CBF increased more than MVO2, resulting in a modest decrease in EO2, whereas with dobutamine, CBF increased in proportion to MVO2, resulting in no change in EO2. After the ischemia and reperfusion, %SS and Elac were reduced, but similar %SS and CBF responses to both agents were observed, except that both agents caused progressive reductions of %PSS. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that both amrinone and dobutamine exert positive inotropic effects in normal and stunned canine myocardium. It is also indicated that amrinone causes direct coronary vasodilation, which is not affected by ischemia and reperfusion, while dobutamine has no direct effect on coronary vascular tone in either normal or stunned myocardium.
Amrinone* ; Animals ; Coronary Vessels ; Dobutamine* ; Dogs* ; Ischemia ; Lactic Acid ; Myocardial Stunning* ; Myocardium ; Oxygen Consumption ; Oxygen* ; Reperfusion ; Reperfusion Injury ; Vasodilation ; Ventricular Pressure

Background: s: The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread worldwide. Cardiac injury after SARS-CoV-2 infection is a major concern. The present study investigated impact of the biomarkers indicating cardiac injury in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients' outcomes. Methods: This study enrolled patients who were confirmed to have COVID-19 and admitted at a tertiary university referral hospital between February 19, 2020 and March 15, 2020. Cardiac injury was defined as an abnormality in one of the following result markers: 1) myocardial damage marker (creatine kinase-MB or troponin-I), 2) heart failure marker (N-terminal-pro B-type natriuretic peptide), and 3) electrical abnormality marker (electrocardiography). The relationship between each cardiac injury marker and mortality was evaluated. Survival analysis of mortality according to the scoring by numbers of cardiac injury markers was also performed. Results: A total of 38 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled. Twenty-two patients (57.9%) had at least one of cardiac injury markers. The patients with cardiac injuries were older (69.6 ± 14.9 vs. 58.6 ± 13.9 years old, P = 0.026), and were more male (59.1% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.013).They showed lower initial oxygen saturation (92.8 vs. 97.1%, P = 0.002) and a trend toward higher mortality (27.3 vs. 6.3%, P = 0.099). The increased number of cardiac injury markers was significantly related to a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality which was also evidenced by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P = 0.008). Conclusion The increased number of cardiac injury markers is related to in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.