Objective: Glufosinate-containing herbicide is being used increasingly in agriculture. Its poisoning is a worldwide concern. This study assessed the ability of the Poison Severity Score (PSS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring systems, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to predict mortality in intensive care unit patients poisoned with glufosinate. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2001 to January 2019. The demographic factors, hemodynamic variables, and laboratory variables were compared in survivors and non-survivors. Using multivariate logistic analysis, the data for the total population were analyzed retrospectively to determine the factors associated with mortality. Significant predictive variables, PSS, APACHE II scoring system, and SOFA score were compared by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Two hundred seventy-six patients (mean age, 56 years) were enrolled in this study. Of the 276 patients, 240 (87.0%) survived, and 36 (13.0%) died. The factors associated with mortality were a decreased mean arterial blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen, HCO3-, pH, and HCO3-, and an increased lactate, ammonia, C-reactive protein, PSS, SOFA score, and APACHE II score. Dyspnea, use of vasopressors, and application of mechanical ventilation were associated with mortality. In multivariate analysis, Glasgow Coma Scale<9, HCO3- <15.8 mmol/L, lactate>5.2 mmol/L, use of vasopressors, and application of mechanical ventilation were predictive of mortality. The areas under the curve and 95% confidence intervals for these indicators were 0.920 (0.834-0.981), 0.865 (0.792-0.923), and 0.824 (0.752-0.897) for the PSS, APACHE II, and SOFA, respectively. Conclusion The PSS can be used to predict in-hospital mortality and stratify the risk among glufosinate-poisoned patients.

Objective: Glufosinate-containing herbicide is being used increasingly in agriculture. Its poisoning is a worldwide concern. This study assessed the ability of the Poison Severity Score (PSS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scoring systems, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score to predict mortality in intensive care unit patients poisoned with glufosinate. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 2001 to January 2019. The demographic factors, hemodynamic variables, and laboratory variables were compared in survivors and non-survivors. Using multivariate logistic analysis, the data for the total population were analyzed retrospectively to determine the factors associated with mortality. Significant predictive variables, PSS, APACHE II scoring system, and SOFA score were compared by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Two hundred seventy-six patients (mean age, 56 years) were enrolled in this study. Of the 276 patients, 240 (87.0%) survived, and 36 (13.0%) died. The factors associated with mortality were a decreased mean arterial blood pressure, Glasgow Coma Scale, partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen, HCO3-, pH, and HCO3-, and an increased lactate, ammonia, C-reactive protein, PSS, SOFA score, and APACHE II score. Dyspnea, use of vasopressors, and application of mechanical ventilation were associated with mortality. In multivariate analysis, Glasgow Coma Scale<9, HCO3- <15.8 mmol/L, lactate>5.2 mmol/L, use of vasopressors, and application of mechanical ventilation were predictive of mortality. The areas under the curve and 95% confidence intervals for these indicators were 0.920 (0.834-0.981), 0.865 (0.792-0.923), and 0.824 (0.752-0.897) for the PSS, APACHE II, and SOFA, respectively. Conclusion The PSS can be used to predict in-hospital mortality and stratify the risk among glufosinate-poisoned patients.

OBJECTIVES: One hypothesis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is that long-standing snoring vibrations and hypoxia of the nerves cause a local neuropathy in the upper airway during sleep. The aim of this study was to investigate olfactory function in subjects comprising snorers and untreated subjects with OSAS, and to correlate data with polysomnographic parameters. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients were evaluated for snoring from January 2010 to December 2013. The mild group (apneahypopnea index [AHI]<15) consisted of 19 subjects, and the moderate-severe group (AHI≥15) consisted of 50 subjects. Exclusion criteria were conductive olfactory dysfunction, previous tonsil or soft palatal surgery, central sleep apnea, and medications that are known to affect peripheral nerves. Nocturnal polysomnography and olfactory function test such as Korean version of Sniffin’s stick test I, II (KVSS I, II) were performed. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in body mass index, average oxygen saturation (SaO2), lowest SaO2, average snoring duration, and KVSS I, II between the two groups. AHI was related to odor threshold score, and average SaO2 was related to odor discrimination score. But, odor identification score showed no relation with AHI and average SaO2 except for age. Average SaO2 and AHI were closely related to the function of smell. CONCLUSION: Hypoxia and low nasal airflow caused by OSAS may have an effect on the olfactory function. On comparison between the two groups, patients with a high AHI, especially those with OSAS, had an olfactory dysfunction. Also, low average oxygen is the main risk factor in determining the olfactory function. In people with OSAS, the possibility of olfactory dysfunction should be considered and an olfactory function test should be performed.
Anoxia ; Body Mass Index ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Humans ; Odors ; Olfaction Disorders ; Oxygen ; Palatine Tonsil ; Peripheral Nerves ; Polysomnography ; Risk Factors ; Sleep Apnea Syndromes* ; Sleep Apnea, Central ; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive ; Smell ; Snoring ; Vibration

Purpose: Glyphosate herbicide (GH) is a widely used herbicide and has been associated with significant mortality as poisoned cases increases. One of the reasons for high toxicity is thought to be toxic effect of its ingredient with glyphosate. This study was designed to determine differences in the clinical course with the salt-type contained in GH. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single hospital between January 2013 and December 2017. We enrolled GH-poisoned patients visited the emergency department. According to salt-type, patients were divided into 4 groups: isopropylamine (IPA), ammonium (Am), potassium (Po), and mixed salts (Mi) groups. The demographics, laboratory variables, complications, and their mortality were analyzed to determine clinical differences associated with each salt-type. Addtionally, we subdivided patients into survivor and non-survivor groups for investigating predictive factors for the mortality. Results: Total of 348 GH-poisoned patients were divided as follows: IPA 248, Am 41, Po 10, and Mi 49 patients. There was no difference in demographic or underlying disease history, but systolic blood pressure (SBP) was low in Po group. The ratio of intentional ingestion was higher in Po and Mi groups. Metabolic acidosis and relatively high lactate level were presented in Po group.As the primary outcome, the mortality rates were as follows: IPA, 26 (10.5%); Am, 2 (4.9%); Po, 1 (10%); and Mi, 1 (2%). There was no statistically significant difference in the mortality and the incidence of complications. Additionally, age, low SBP, low pH, corrected QT (QTc) prolongation, and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation were analyzed as independent predictors for mortality in a regression analysis. Conclusion There was no statistical difference in their complications and the mortality across the GH-salt groups in this study.

Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to provide guidance on the implementation of a surgical treatment of oral cancer. MEDLINE databases were searched for articles on subjects related to “surgical management of oral cancer” published in English. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. The quality of evidence was rated with use RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies) and AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. Additional directives are provided as expert opinions and Delphi questionnaire when insufficient evidence existed. The Committee developed 68 evidence-based recommendations in 34 categories intended to assist clinicians and patients and counselors, and health policy-makers. Proper surgical treatment selection for oral cancer, which is directed by patient- and subsite-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. These guidelines are intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals.
Advisory Committees ; Bias (Epidemiology) ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ; Counseling ; Expert Testimony ; Humans ; Mouth Neoplasms ; Neck ; Republic of Korea