1.Vascular Calcification Scores are Associated with Arterial Stiffness, Inflammation, and Nutrition in Hemodialysis Patients.
Sun Young SHIN ; Kyu Hyun HAN ; Hye Yun JEONG ; Ji Min CHU ; Hong Min KIM ; Seongeun SUH ; Yukyung HYUN ; Hyung Jong KIM
Korean Journal of Medicine 2014;87(1):42-52
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The vascular calcification (VC) score on a plain X-ray is associated with cardiovascular disease and mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study examined the correlations among the VC scores for the hands and pelvis X-rays, arterial stiffness, inflammation, and nutrition in HD patients. METHODS: VC was evaluated using plain x-rays of the hands and pelvis. Patients were categorized into the VC (+) (VC score > or = 3) or VC (-) (VC score < 3) groups. We measured the pulse wave velocity (PWV), ankle brachial index (ABI), and augmentation index (AI). RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 55.6 +/- 13.2 years. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) was significantly higher in the VC (+) group than in the VC (-) group (87.5 vs. 34.2%, p < 0.05). The serum PTH (98.4 +/- 141.9 vs. 183.6 +/- 231.3 pg/mL, p < 0.05) and albumin (3.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.9 +/- 0.3 g/dL, p < 0.05) levels were significantly lower and PWV was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the VC (+) group. In multiple linear regression analysis, only the presence of diabetes mellitus was significantly related to the VC score. CONCLUSIONS: The VC score was associated with the serum PTH and albumin, as well as with vascular stiffness. C-reactive protein did not show any significant association with the VC score.
Ankle Brachial Index
;
C-Reactive Protein
;
Cardiovascular Diseases
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Hand
;
Humans
;
Inflammation*
;
Linear Models
;
Mortality
;
Pelvis
;
Prevalence
;
Pulse Wave Analysis
;
Renal Dialysis*
;
Vascular Calcification*
;
Vascular Stiffness*
2.Comparison of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography and Exercise ECG Test for Diagnostic Accuracy in Real-World Practice.
Seongeun YUN ; Young Ran KANG ; Kyehwan KIM ; Young Min CHOI ; Jungwoo CHOI ; Jin Sin KOH ; Jeong Rang PARK ; Yongwhi PARK ; Seok Jae HWANG ; Young Hoon JUNG ; Choong Hwan KWAK ; Hocheol CHOI ; Kyung Nyeo JEON ; Jin Yong HWANG
Korean Journal of Medicine 2014;87(2):165-172
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The exercise ECG test (XECG) and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) have been used widely in initial evaluations of coronary artery disease (CAD) in real-world practice. In this study, we compared the diagnostic power of CTCA and XECG, based on conventional coronary angiography (CCA). METHODS: We enrolled 589 consecutive patients retrospectively who had been examined with both XECG and CTCA for the evaluation of CAD in outpatient clinics. Significant stenosis was defined as more than 50% diameter stenosis. Triage to CCA and/or revascularization treatment (RT) by the results of XECG and CTCA and the diagnostic accuracy of both exams, based on CCA, were investigated. RESULTS: In the 589 patients, 107 (19%) were triaged to CCA for further evaluation; in 77 (12.8%) significant stenosis was detected on CCA. Also, 65 (11%) patients underwent RT. In the CTCA results, 120 patients had significant stenosis. Of them, 58 (48%) and 75 (62%) patients were triaged to RT and CCA, respectively. Based on the XECG, 115 positive patients were triaged to RT and CCA (23 [20%]/41 [35%]). Among 107 patients with CCA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for significant stenosis on CCA of CTCA were 89.9%, 74.0%, 90.6%, and 71.4%, respectively, and those of XECG were 50.0, 67.9, 78.0, and 37.3, respectively. The kappa value of CCA and CTCA was 0.62 (p < 0.001) and that of CCA and XECG was 0.145 (p = 0.113). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice, CCA was decided on more frequently, based on CTCA. CTCA showed better diagnostic accuracy than XECG.
Ambulatory Care Facilities
;
Constriction, Pathologic
;
Coronary Angiography*
;
Coronary Artery Disease
;
Electrocardiography*
;
Humans
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Triage