No abstract available.
Lipoma*

No abstract available.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical benefits of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTGBD), especially regarding morbidity and mortality, in patients aged 60 or older with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: A retrospective study was done on a series of elderly patients (>60 years old; n=132) who had been diagnosed between January 2007 and December 2009 as having acute cholecystitis. The patients were divided into 4 groups; cases in which only laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was done (Group 1, n=84), cases in which LC was done after preoperative PTGBD (Group 2, n=15), cases in which only open cholecystectomy was done (Group 3, n=23), and cases in which open cholecystectomy was done after preoperative PTGBD (Group 4, n=10). We analyzed between group differences in surgical outcomes including periods of postoperative fast and postoperative hospital stay, OP. morbidity, and open conversion rate. RESULTS: Patients in Group 1 had fewer underlying medical problems and lower ASA scores than patients in groups 2, 3, or 4 (p<0.05). Mean operating time in Group 2 (113.66+/-107.5 min) was significantly longer than in group 1 (72.02.9+/-34.2 min) (p<0.05) and the open conversion rate was higher (8.33% vs 26.67%). But, blood loss (ml) and OP time in Group 2 were lower than in Group 3 or 4 (p<0.001). Postoperative recovery progression (periods of postoperative fasting and length of postoperative hospital stay) of Group 2 were better than in groups 3 or 4 (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pre-operative PTGBD procedures in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis is a good clinical option as a pretreatment to a cholecystitis operation.
Aged ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic ; Cholecystitis ; Cholecystitis, Acute ; Drainage ; Fasting ; Gallbladder ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: The laparoscopic appendectomy has been a basic part of the principal of a more complex laparoscopic technique for the surgical trainee. As the number of laparoscopic appendectomies performed by surgical trainees has increased, we are trying to check the stability of, which is controversial, and the learning curve associated with a laparoscopic appendectomy. METHODS: We studied the demographics, histologic diagnoses, operative time, the number of complicated cases, and hospital duration of one hundred and three patients who underwent an open appendectomy (group A, 53) or a laparoscopic appendectomy (group B, 50) retrospectively through a review of their medical records. The learning curve for the laparoscopic appendectomy was established through the moving average and ANOVA methods. RESULTS: There were no differences in the operative times (A, 64.15 +/- 29.88 minutes; B, 58.2 +/- 20.72 minutes; P-value, 0.225) and complications (A, 11%; B, 6%; P-value, 0.34) between group A and group B. Group B was divided into group C who underwent the operation in the early period (before the learning curve) and group D who underwent the operation in the later period (after the learning curve). The average operative time for group C was 66.83 +/- 21.55 minutes, but it was 45.25 +/- 10.19 minutes for group D (P-value < 0.0001). Although this difference was statistically significant, no significant difference in the complication rate was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A laparoscopic appendectomy, compared with an open appendectomy, performed by a surgical trainee is safe. In this study, the learning curve for a laparoscopic appendectomy was thirty cases.
Appendectomy ; Demography ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Learning ; Learning Curve ; Medical Records ; Operative Time ; Retrospective Studies

PURPOSE: To determine if pattern analysis of defecography can predict the responsiveness of biofeedback therapy in patients with chronic functional constipation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a two-year period, 104 patients with chronic functional constipation underwent defecography and biofeedback therapy. Two blinded readers analyzed the defecographic findings and classified them into six types; I = normal defecation, II = hypertonic lower anal sphincter (poor anal opening due to a persistent contraction of the lower anal sphincter), III = dyskinetic puborectal sling (inadequate laxity of the puborectal sling), IV = spastic pelvic floor syndrome (persistent contraction of both the puborectal sling and the lower anal sphincter), V = unclassified (including paradoxical contraction of the anal sphincter), VI = anatomical obstruction. In addition, the degree of rectal contraction during defecation was scored (grade 0 to 3). After biofeedback therapy, the differences in the defecography patterns or rectal contractions between the two groups, the responsive or non-responsive group, were analyzed. RESULTS: The defecograms revealed that the type IV of the spastic pelvic floor syndrome was most common (50 of 104 patients, 48%), followed by II (21/104, 20%), III (12/104, 11.5%), V (9/104, 9%) and VI (12/104, 11.5%). Biofeedback therapy showed a therapeutic response in 71 out of 104 patients (68%) but failed in 33 patients (32%). However, there were no significant differences in the defecographic pattern between the responsive and non-responsive groups (p=0.630). The defecograms revealed rectal contractions in 78 patients (75%) and moderate to vigorous contractions (more than grade 2) in 66 patients. Most of the biofeedback-responsive group showed rectal contractions (66 of 71 patients, 93%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic functional constipation, there was no significant difference in the morphological patterns of the defecogram between the responsive and non-responsive biofeedback groups. However, the presence of rectal contractions during defecation was strongly associated with the therapeutic response after biofeedback therapy.
Anal Canal ; Biofeedback, Psychology* ; Constipation* ; Defecation ; Defecography* ; Humans ; Muscle Spasticity ; Pelvic Floor

No abstract available.
Asymptomatic Diseases ; Carotid Artery, Internal ; Carotid Stenosis ; Fingers