1.Two cases of Gaucher disease in brother and sister.
Yong Ju KIM ; Ki Young CHEONG ; Jong Jin SEO ; Keon Su RHEE ; Young Hun CHUNG ; Seon Hoe KOO
Journal of the Korean Pediatric Society 1991;34(8):1151-1156
No abstract available.
Anemia
;
Gaucher Disease*
;
Humans
;
Siblings*
;
Thrombocytopenia
2.A study of DNA ploidity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Jeong Ho PARK ; Jong Wan KIM ; Chan Bin IM ; Seon Hoe KOO ; Jong Woo PARK ; Kye Cheol KWON
Korean Journal of Clinical Pathology 1991;11(3):549-555
No abstract available.
DNA*
;
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin*
3.Evaluation of the Automated Cross-Matching Instrument, ORTHO VISION, for Use in Blood Banks
Mosae KOO ; Jinsook LIM ; Seon Yung KIM ; Ji Myung KIM ; Sun Hoe KOO ; Gye Cheol KWON
Laboratory Medicine Online 2019;9(4):218-223
BACKGROUND: Automated systems are used widely for pre-transfusion tests in blood banks, in an attempt to reduce effort and human error. We evaluated the clinical performance of an automated blood bank system, ORTHO VISION (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Switzerland), for blood cross-matching. METHODS: Saline cross-matching was performed for 93 tests using 56 samples. Coombs cross-matching was performed for 400 tests using 166 samples. Saline cross-matching was compared for the automated ORTHO VISION and manual tube methods. Coombs cross-matching was compared for the automated ORTHO VISION and manual column agglutination technique (CAT) methods. The evaluation of 32 antibody-positive samples using the automated ORTHO VISION and manual CAT methods was compared by performing 97 cross-matching tests. Additionally, the ORTHO VISION efficiency and carryover were evaluated. RESULTS: The concordance rate of the saline cross-matching results between the manual method and automated ORTHO VISION was 100%. The concordance rate of coombs cross-matching results between manual CAT and automated ORTHO VISION was 97.9%. The concordance rate of cross-matching for antibody positive samples between manual CAT and the automated ORTHO VISION was 97.9%. Coombs cross-matching was efficient using ORTHO VISION, whereas saline cross-matching was efficient using the tube manual method. CONCLUSIONS: ORTHO VISION showed reliable results for cross-matching and was more efficient than manual CAT for coombs cross-matching. Thus, ORTHO VISION can be used for pre-transfusion tests in blood banks.
Agglutination
;
Animals
;
Automation
;
Blood Banks
;
Cats
;
Humans
;
Methods
4.Comparison of Red Blood Cell, White Blood Cell and Differential Counts between UF-5000 System and Manual Method
Mo Sae KOO ; Jinsook LIM ; Seon Young KIM ; Sun Hoe KOO ; Gye Cheol KWON
Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance 2019;41(3):172-178
BACKGROUND: Analysis of body fluids provides important information for assessing various medical conditions. We aimed to validate the analytical and diagnostic performance of the Sysmex UF-5000 (Sysmex, Japan) system for the analysis of different body fluids. METHODS: Eighty body fluid samples were analyzed using the UF-5000 system in the body fluid mode and light microscopy. Body fluids included ascitic, pleural, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), as well as other fluid samples. RESULTS: A comparison between the UF-5000 system and manual counting demonstrated good correlations with regard to red (r=0.6555) and white blood cell (r=0.9666) counts. The UF-5000 system also demonstrated good performance for differential cell counting (r=0.9028). CSF particularly showed a good correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the UF-5000 system for cell counting and differential analysis of body fluid samples might be an effective and automated alternative to chamber counting in laboratory routine analysis, thereby enhancing laboratory workflow and clinical effectiveness.
Automation
;
Body Fluids
;
Cell Count
;
Cerebrospinal Fluid
;
Erythrocytes
;
Leukocytes
;
Methods
;
Microscopy
;
Treatment Outcome
5.he Performance of the Newly Released Automated Chemistry Analyzer Rx Imola.
So Youn SHIN ; Kye Chul KWON ; Sun Hoe KOO ; Jong Woo PARK ; Chi Seon KO
Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance 2007;29(2):217-223
BACKGROUND: The Rx Imola (Randox, UK) is newly released bench top - fully automated analyzer based on Window XP software with high-throughput (640 tests per hour with ISE) and continuous random access. We evaluated the performance of Rx Imola for the routine chemistry. METHODS: Repeatability (within-day precision), between-day precision, within-device precision, linearity, recovery rates and correlation were evaluated for 19 items including AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, total bilirubin, calcium, phosphorus, albumin, total protein, BUN, creatinine, glucose, amylase, total cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, LDH, CK and uric acid. Commercialized quality control materials and patient's sera were used. For correlation study, 747-100 (HITACHI, Japan) and VITROS 950 (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, USA) were used as comparative analyzers. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation (CVs) of all items in repeatability and between-day precision study were below 5%. The linearities were statistically acceptable (R2>0.99) for all items. The recovery rates ranged from 95.7 to 105.3%. The comparison study showed high correlation between Rx Imola and 747-100 or VITROS 950. Correlation coefficients of all items were above 0.99 except HDL and albumin. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed satisfactory results in precision, linearity, recovery rates and comparison studies of Rx Imola. It was expected to be useful for routine chemistry analysis and back up, because of high performance, easy handling and small size.
Amylases
;
Bilirubin
;
Calcium
;
Chemistry*
;
Cholesterol
;
Creatinine
;
Glucose
;
Phosphorus
;
Quality Control
;
Statistics as Topic
;
Triglycerides
;
Uric Acid
6.Clinical and Cytogenetic Analysis of Midtrimester Amniocentesis.
Jin Gu LEE ; Koo Hyun CHUNG ; Byung Hun KANG ; Heung Tae NOH ; Yun Ee RHEE ; Seon Hoe GU
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;47(10):1872-1879
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the indications, clinical features, cytogenetic results and complications of amniocentesis and to determine the efficacy of antenatal genetic amniocentesis. METHODS: We analyzed retrospectively maternal age, gestational age, indications, transplacental puncture, frequency, discoloration of amniotic fluid, karyotype and complications in 325 cases of prenatal genetic amniocentesis performed at Chungnam National University Hospital from January 2000 to December 2002. RESULTS: The most common age group was from 30 to 34 (31.4%) and mean age was 32.7 years old. 85.3% of cases were performed at 16th-20th gestational weeks. Abnormal maternal serum markers were the most common indication of amniocentesis (56.0%) and the second most common indication was maternal age over 35 (33.2%). Abnormal karyotypes were found in 12 cases (3.6%) and normal variants were 21 cases (6.5%). Numerical aberration were 9 cases (2.7%) and structural aberration were 3 cases (0.3%). Among the autosomal aberrations, Down syndromes were 5 cases and Edward syndrome was 1 case. Among the sex chromosomal aberrations, 47,XXX were 2 cases and Turner syndrome was 1 case. As the increasing maternal age, the incidence of abnormal karyotype was increased. Procedure-related complications occurred in 11.7% of cases and fetal loss rate was 7.4%. No significant associations were found between procedure-related complications and maternal age, gestational age, transplacental puncture, frequency, discoloration of amniotic fluid, and antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSION: Amniocentesis is useful for prenatal genetic diagnosis in pregnancies with increasing risk of chromosome aberrations, such as advanced maternal age, abnormal maternal serum markers or abnormal US findings. Further studies are necessary to identify risk factors of complications after invasive procedure.
Abnormal Karyotype
;
Amniocentesis*
;
Amniotic Fluid
;
Biomarkers
;
Chromosome Aberrations
;
Chungcheongnam-do
;
Cytogenetic Analysis*
;
Cytogenetics*
;
Diagnosis
;
Female
;
Gestational Age
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Karyotype
;
Maternal Age
;
Pregnancy
;
Pregnancy Trimester, Second*
;
Punctures
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
;
Turner Syndrome
7.Performance Evaluation of the CRE2 Reagent from Siemens for Serum Creatinine Measurement.
Hyunjin KIM ; Jinsook LIM ; Sun Hoe KOO ; Jimyung KIM ; Seon Young KIM ; Gye Cheol KWON
Laboratory Medicine Online 2019;9(1):6-11
BACKGROUND: For creatinine measurement, the enzymatic method is known to be more accurate than the Jaffe method; however, the latter is still widely used. We evaluated the performance of the CRE2 reagent (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., USA), which uses a modified Jaffe method. METHODS: Three quality control standards were used for precision evaluations of CRE2 on Dimension VISTA 500 instrument (Siemens). Moreover, the linearity and carryover characteristics were assessed. Sixty-eight creatinine results obtained using the CRE2 and ECREA (enzymatic) reagents (Siemens) were compared with those obtained using the L-CRE (enzymatic) reagent (Shinyang Diagnostics, Korea). The accuracy of CRE2, ECREA, and L-CRE was evaluated using a standard reference material. RESULTS: The CV of within-run (0.7–2.4%), between-run (0.4–1.7%), between-day precision (0.7–0.9%) for three standards, and total CV for medium (1.6%) and high levels (1.3%) satisfied the analytical goal. The linearity for CRE2 was excellent (R2=0.999). Comparisons of CRE2 and ECREA to L-CRE were well correlated (r=0.996 and 0.997, respectively). In comparison with L-CRE, 5 CRE2 results and 15 ECREA results exceeded minimum bias goal (5.1%) in samples with creatinine levels of >1 mg/dL. The carryover rate was −0.04%. In terms of accuracy, the percent bias values of CRE2, ECREA, and L-CRE were 7.4, −6.4, and −3.4, respectively, for low level; and 3.9, −1.5, and 0.7, respectively, for high level. CONCLUSIONS: For creatinine measurements, the CRE2 reagent showed good performance. It can be used in the diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and risk assessment of kidney diseases.
Bias (Epidemiology)
;
Creatinine*
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Diagnosis
;
Indicators and Reagents
;
Kidney Diseases
;
Methods
;
Quality Control
;
Risk Assessment
8.Evaluation of Two Automated Instruments for Pre-transfusion Testing: AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation.
So Youn SHIN ; Kye Chul KWON ; Sun Hoe KOO ; Jong Woo PARK ; Chi Seon KO ; Jeong Hoon SONG ; Ji Youn SUNG
The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine 2008;28(3):214-220
BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in total laboratory automation, a considerable amount of work in blood banks is still done using outdated manual methods. Some automated pre-transfusion testing instruments have recently been developed. Of these, we evaluated and compared the AutoVue Innova (Ortho, USA) and the Techno TwinStation (DiaMed AG, Switzerland). METHODS: Forward and reverse ABO/Rh typing and unexpected antibody screening and identification tests were performed on 4,628 samples using the manual method and the two automated instruments. Two different anticoagulants (EDTA and citrate) were compared in ABO/Rh typing and unexpected antibody screening tests. Titrating studies were conducted on the following 7 dilutions using 5 samples of irregular antibodies with anti-E, anti-E & -c, anti-D, and anti-Le(a) with anti-Fy(a): 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, 1:32, 1:64, and 1:128. The test throughput per hour, the time required to perform 1 and 100 tests, and a simulation test for total events occurring in 1 day were also measured. RESULTS: No erroneous results were reported between the two instruments and the manual method. Discrepancies observed in 10 cases (0.4%) of ABO/Rh typing were of higher intensity with AutoVue Innova than with the manual method. AutoVue Innova exhibited the highest sensitivity in the titrating study and throughput performance compared with the manual method and the Techno TwinStation. Especially in the throughput and time required to complete 100 antibody screening tests, AutoVue Innova had a 3.3- and 3.5-fold higher performance, respectively, than Techno TwinStation. CONCLUSIONS: Because both of the two fully automated instruments (AutoVue Innova and Techno TwinStation) had high levels of accuracy and performance, it is expected that use of fully automated instruments will reduce human labor, turnaround time, and operator error in the blood bank.
ABO Blood-Group System/blood
;
Antibodies/blood
;
Automation
;
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching/*instrumentation
;
Blood Transfusion
;
Cost-Benefit Analysis
;
False Positive Reactions
;
Humans
;
Rh-Hr Blood-Group System/blood
9.Reference Intervals in Healthy Adults using Automatic Cell Counter Beckman Coulter LH 750.
Tae Eun JEONG ; Kee Su NA ; Kye Chul KWON ; Sun Hoe KOO ; Chi Seon KO ; Jong Woo PARK
Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance 2005;27(1):173-181
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to set reference intervals of healthy adults using Beckman Coulter LH 750 by gender and age. METHODS: The specimens were obtained from a total of 705 healthy adults (male 484, female 221), who took part in annual health-check at Chungnam National University Hospital, analyzed in total 22 parameters and compared using SPSS V10.0 program. RESULTS: Totally 16 parameters showed the Gaussian distribution with 12 in parametric method and 4 in logarithmically transformed parametric method. All acquired reference intervals were showed in Table 3, 4, 5 and 6. There were statistical significances between genders in RBC, Hgb, Hct, MCV, MCH, WBC, EO%, LY#, MO#, EO#, MPV, PDW (P<0.001), BA% (P=0.001), NE% (P=0.016), BA# (P=0.019), MO% (P=0.021) and NE# (P=0.039), between age decades in RBC, Hgb, Hct, MCV, MCH, NE%, LY% (P<0.001), LY# (P=0.002), EO%, NE# (P=0.003) and Pct (P=0.033) as well as between genders and age decades in RBC, Hct (P=0.001), Hgb (P=0.004), LY# (P=0.005), Plt (P=0.014) and MO% (P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the reference intervals of RBC and Hgb ought to be set by both genders and age decades, WBC by gender and the others by total study populations. Moreover, it need to be set the reference intervals by each laboratory for itself and to be monitored with periodic review.
Adult*
;
Cell Count*
;
Chungcheongnam-do
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Normal Distribution
10.Evaluation of the Automated Blood Bank Systems IH-500 and VISION Max for ABO-RhD Blood Typing and Unexpected Antibody Screening.
Yumi PARK ; Seon Young KIM ; Sun Hoe KOO ; Jinsook LIM ; Ji Myung KIM ; Young Ae LIM ; Gye Cheol KWON
Laboratory Medicine Online 2017;7(4):170-175
BACKGROUND: The use of automated systems for pre-transfusion tests is increasing in an attempt to reduce workload and the impact of human errors in blood banks. We evaluated the clinical performance of the automated blood bank systems IH-500 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Switzerland) and VISION Max (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, USA) for ABO-RhD blood typing and unexpected antibody screening. METHODS: ABO-RhD blood typing was performed for 410 samples, and antibody screening was performed for 332 samples, including 15 antibody-positive samples. The results obtained from the two automated instruments were compared with those obtained using manual methods for ABO-RhD blood typing and a semiautomated method (DiaMed-ID system) for antibody screening. Additionally, both instruments were evaluated in terms of concordance rates, sensitivity, and carryover. RESULTS: The concordance rate of the ABO-RhD blood typing results between the manual methods and the two automated instruments was 100%. For antibody screening tests, the concordance rates between the semiautomated method (DiaMed-ID system) and the automated methods were 100% and 99.7% for the IH-500 and VISION Max instruments, respectively. The sole discrepant result was obtained for a sample identified as antibody-positive only on the VISION Max; the antibody was identified as anti-Le(a). The overall sensitivity of the two automated instruments was the same as or higher than that of the semiautomated method. Carryover was not observed in antibody screening. CONCLUSIONS: The IH-500 and VISION Max instruments showed reliable results for ABO-RhD blood typing and unexpected antibody screening, and can be used clinically, with confidence, for pre-transfusion tests in the blood bank.
Automation
;
Blood Banks*
;
Blood Grouping and Crossmatching*
;
Humans
;
Mass Screening*
;
Methods