1.Treatment of obstructive colorectal cancer.
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2023;26(1):44-50
Obstructive colorectal cancer is a common malignant bowel obstruction. Colostomy or colostomy following tumor resection may be the first choice for emergency surgery. The intestinal and systemic conditions of patients undergoing emergency surgery are often poor, and patients need to undergo multiple operations, which increase the surgical risk and economic burden and reduce the quality of life of patients. Poor intraoperative visualization may also affect the radical operation of emergency surgery. Transanal decompression tube (TDT) can rapidly decompress and drain the obstructed bowel, effectively relieve obstruction symptoms, and improve the success rate of primary radical resection. The TDT squeeze the tumor lightly, causing no spread of tumor cells, and is cheap, but the cavity of transanal decompression tube is small and easily blocked, and requires tedious flushing or regular replacement. Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) can relieve intestinal obstruction effectively, provide sufficient preparation time for preoperative examination and improvement of nutritional status. By improving patient's tolerance to radical surgery, SEMS might be used as an important treatment strategy choice for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, SEMS may squeeze the tumor, leading to the spread of tumor cells, increase the recurrence rate and metastasis rate, and reduce the survival rate. Moreover, intestinal wall edema still existed during the operation following SEMS, and the rate of ostomy after anastomosis was as high as 34%. We hypothesized that prolonging the interval between stent insertion and surgery to 2 months, with neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered during this interval (SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy), would help improve outcomes. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy is a safe, effective, and well tolerated treatment approach with a high laparoscopic resection rate, low stoma formation rate and improvement in the overall survival for patients with left-sided colon cancer obstruction. The patient physical status is improved, the primary tumor is downstaged, and intestinal wall edema is relieved during the relatively longer interval between SEMS placement and surgery. The SEMS-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategy may be a preferred therapeutic strategy for obstructive left colon cancer.
Humans
;
Quality of Life
;
Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects*
;
Colonic Neoplasms/surgery*
;
Stents/adverse effects*
;
Intestinal Obstruction/surgery*
;
Treatment Outcome
;
Colorectal Neoplasms/complications*
;
Retrospective Studies
3.A Unique Use of a Double-Pigtail Plastic Stent: Correction of Kinking of the Common Bile Duct Due to a Metal Stent.
Masaki KUWATANI ; Hiroshi KAWAKAMI ; Yoko ABE ; Shuhei KAWAHATA ; Kazumichi KAWAKUBO ; Kimitoshi KUBO ; Naoya SAKAMOTO
Gut and Liver 2015;9(2):251-252
A 72-year-old man with jaundice by ampullary adenocarcinoma was treated at our hospital. For biliary decompression, a transpapillary, fully covered, self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) was deployed. Four days later, the patient developed acute cholangitis. Endoscopic carbon dioxide cholangiography revealed kinking of the common bile duct above the proximal end of the FCSEMS. A 7-F double-pigtail plastic stent was therefore placed through the FCSEMS to correct the kink, straightening the common bile duct (CBD) and improving cholangitis. This is the first report of a unique use of a double-pigtail plastic stent to correct CBD kinking. The placement of a double-pigtail plastic stent can correct CBD kinking, without requiring replacement or addition of a FCSEMS, and can lead to cost savings.
Aged
;
Common Bile Duct/*injuries
;
Constriction, Pathologic/surgery
;
Decompression, Surgical/instrumentation/methods
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Self Expandable Metallic Stents/adverse effects
;
*Stents
;
Torsion Abnormality/*surgery
4.Efficacy of different types of self-expandable stents in carotid artery stenting for carotid bifurcation stenosis.
Ya-min LIU ; Hao QIN ; Bo ZHANG ; Yu-jing WANG ; Jun FENG ; Xiang WU
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Medical Sciences) 2016;36(1):95-98
Both open and closed loop self-expandable stents were used in carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid bifurcation stenosis. We sought to compare the efficacy of two types of stents in CAS. The data of 212 patients treated with CAS (42 and 170 cases implanted with closed and open loop stents, respectively) for carotid bifurcation stenosis and distal filtration protection devices were retrospectively analyzed. Between closed and open loop stents, there were no significant differences in hospitalization duration, NIHSS score before and after the treatment, stenosis at 12th month, and cumulative incidence of primary endpoint events within 30 days or from the 31st day to the 12th month; while there were significant differences in hemodynamic changes and rate of difficulty in recycling distal filtration protection devices. Use of open vs. closed loop stents for carotid bifurcation stenosis seems to be associated with similar incidence of complications, except for greater rate of hemodynamic changes and lower rate of difficulty in recycling the distal filtration protection devices.
Adult
;
Aged
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Carotid Arteries
;
surgery
;
Carotid Stenosis
;
surgery
;
Endovascular Procedures
;
adverse effects
;
instrumentation
;
methods
;
Female
;
Hemodynamics
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Postoperative Complications
;
Self Expandable Metallic Stents
;
adverse effects