OBJECTIVE: We determined the influence of 3-OMD in the protein binding of levodopa to estimate the effect of 3-OMD on the penetration of levodopa into brain. METHOD: P-glycoprotein in the brain may serve to limit drug penetration into the brain. Because it is not available as an experimental substance, but has similar binding properties with alpha 1 acid glycoprotein(AGP), we used AGP in this study. Additionally, we used blood plasma to see the affinity of plasma binding of levodopa. The final concentration of chemicals used in this study were 125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000 microgram/l for levodopa and 0, 1250, 5000, 10,000 microgram/l for 3-OMD, 1 mg/l for AGP. The free fraction of levodopa in blood plasma and AGP were separated by ultrafiltration method and determined by beta-counter, respectively. RESULTS: We found that levodopa did not bind with AGP, but only 22-24% from 125 microgram/l to 4000 microgram/l of it bound with blood plasma. The addition of 3-OMD to the blood plasma did not significantly change the binding of levodopa. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that 3-OMD does not influence the penetration of levodopa into brain. These small amount of the binding does not expect to influence to other drugs on the binding with plasma.
Brain ; Drug Interactions ; Levodopa* ; P-Glycoprotein ; Plasma* ; Protein Binding ; Ultrafiltration

Background/Aims: Hypoxemia is a common side effect of propofol sedation during endoscopy. Applying mild positive airway pressure (PAP) using a nasal mask may offer a simple way to reduce such events and optimize the conditions for diagnostic and therapeutic upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. Methods: We compared overweight patients (body mass index >25 kg/m2) with a nasal PAP mask or standard nasal cannula undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopies by non-anesthesiologists who provided propofol sedation. Outcome parameters included the frequency and severity of hypoxemic episodes. Results: We analyzed 102 procedures in 51 patients with nasal PAP masks and 51 controls. Episodes of hypoxemia (oxygen saturation [SpO2] <90% at any time during sedation) occurred in 25 (49.0%) controls compared to 8 (15.7%) patients with nasal PAP masks (p<0.001). Severe hypoxemia (SpO2 <80%) occurred in three individuals (5.9%) in both groups. The mean delta between baseline SpO2 and the lowest SpO2 recorded was significantly decreased among patients with nasal PAP mask compared to controls (3.7 and 8.2 percentage points difference, respectively). There were significantly fewer airway interventions performed in the nasal PAP mask group (15.7% vs. 41.2%, p=0.008). Conclusions Using a nasal PAP mask may be a simple means of increasing patient safety and ease of examination.