No abstract available.
Seat Belts*

No abstract available.
Seat Belts ; Vaccination

The seat belt is designed for safety in a motor vehicle and should be worn to prevent severe injuries. But, the seat belt itself can be an injury factor in combination with deceleration forces applied to fixation points of mobile viscera. Here, we present a 23-year-man with traumatic transection of the appendix, highly mobile viscera, following seat belt injury.
Appendix ; Deceleration ; Motor Vehicles ; Seat Belts* ; Viscera

Bipolar clavicular dislocation is simultaneous dislocation of both poles of the clavicle (mainly an anterior dislocation of the sternoclavicular joint and a posterior dislocation of acromioclavicular joint) and rarely reported. We report a case of bipolar claviclular dislocation after a seat belt injury and describe its presumed mechanism and treatment with a review of literature.
Clavicle ; Dislocations ; Seat Belts ; Sternoclavicular Joint

Automobile Driving ; China ; Humans ; Seat Belts ; utilization

The increase in car usage due to economic prosperity has led to increase in occupant injuries. One way to reduce the injuries encountered by road accident victims is by implementing the rear seatbelt (RSB) law. Rear seatbelt wearing has been proven to save lives. In Malaysia, the implementation of the restraint system for front occupant has started in the 70’s. However, the rear seatbelt enforcement law only came in 2009, after six months of an advocacy program. Prior to the introduction of the rear seatbelt law, rear seatbelt wearing rate was rather low, started to increase gradually during the advocacy period and jumped to the highest level after two month of the enforcement. This paper attempts to assess the effectiveness of the rear seatbelt intervention in reducing injuries among passenger car occupants in Malaysia using the generalized linear model (GLM). In GLM procedure, the dependent variable is the number of people from passenger vehicles that sustained severe and slight injuries, for the study period. The study period selected covers six months before implementation, six months during advocacy program, and six months after the law is implemented. The independent variables considered are enforcement and balik kampung activities (both are dummy variables) and time effect. Our results suggest that RSB intervention (p-value= 0.0001) had significantly reduced the number of people sustained serious and slight injuries by about 20%. The implementation of change in the RSB law has benefited not only in reducing the number of injuries but also result to great impact to the health outcomes.
Seat Belts ; Law Enforcement ; prevention & control ; Malaysia

Despite of its importance for preventing fatal and severe injuries in an event of a crash, limited studies were conducted to find out the status of seatbelt use among rear passengers in Malaysia. This study was conducted to the determine seatbelt use among rear passengers in Malaysia in conjunction with the introduction of the rear seatbelt law that took effect on 1st January 2009. Two methods were used; the roadside observations and surveys. A total of 4180 rear passengers were observed during the road side observation and 793 rear passengers were interviewed in the survey. About 41.8 % (95 % CI: 38.3, 45.4) of rear passengers interviewed reported that they “Always/Often’ wore safety belts, while roadside observation recorded slightly lower rate (36.2 % [95 % CI: 34.8, 37.7]). Based on the roadside observation method, male rear passengers were more likely to use rear seatbelts as compared to female rear passengers (with Odd Ratio: 1.17 (95 % CI: 1.03, 1.33)). Both methods consistently reported that rear passengers of Multipurpose Vehicle (MPV)/Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) (survey method “always wear”: 39.3 %, Odd Ratio: 2.02 [95 % CI: 1.13, 3.61], roadside observation method: 51.9 %, Odd Ratio: 2.23 [95 % CI: 1.89, 2.62]) were two times more likely to wear seatbelts as compared to rear passengers of a car. The two research methods indicate rear passengers in Malaysia were consistently having low seatbelt usage rate. As the rear seatbelt advocacy and enforcement programme are new in Malaysia, efforts to advocate rear seatbelt use should be strengthened. The changes in rear seatbelt usage rate need to be tracked regularly and as an alternative to roadside observation method, interview survey method could be used to measure the seatbelt usage rate and to identify the reason for not using safety belt among rear passengers.
Seat Belts ; Motor Vehicles ; Observation ; Data Collection ; Accident Prevention

In traffic accidents, wearing a seatbelt can cause abdominal aortic injury due to an abrupt deceleration. We report a case of abdominal aorta dissection caused by a seat belt in a frontal motor vehicle collision. The initial symptoms and signs were vague or uncertain. However, he complained severe abdominal pain with seat belt sign below the umbilicus. Abdominal computed tomography scans showed an initial flap of the abdominal aorta with hematoma and hazy stranding of the mesentery.
Abdominal Pain ; Accidents, Traffic ; Aorta, Abdominal* ; Deceleration ; Hematoma ; Mesentery ; Motor Vehicles* ; Seat Belts* ; Umbilicus

Neck fracture is a major cause of death in traffic accidents and this injury pattern occurred normally in a frontal collision or overturn process. This study investigates a case of neck fracture from a low speed collision. In this case examined, the passenger in the front seat of the car was pulled back and did not have the seat belt on. As the vehicle slipped on a frozen road surface in a downward hill and crashed into the shoulder of the road at low speed. But strangely, even though his neck is fracture there were not any collision marks on interior of the car. This study applied computer simulation to analyze this case and we found out that the upper part of the person was rotated and raised at the time of collision and his neck was fully bent by interference with roof and we also know that the seat belt did not resist the passenger who pulled back his seat.
Accidents, Traffic ; Cause of Death ; Computer Simulation ; Humans ; Neck Injuries ; Neck* ; Seat Belts ; Shoulder

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the injury patterns of unrestrained front-seat passengers in traffic crashes. METHODS: Using 2000~2003 data from the Jeonbuk Provincial Police Agency and medical-chart review, we estimated the relationship between crash patterns and individual variables, such as age, sex, Injury Severity Score, prehospital care, outcome, injury types, passenger seats, velocity, and alcohol consumption. We also investigated whether the Injury Severity Score correlated with crash patterns, passenger seats, velocity, prehospital care, and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: The mean Injury Severity Scores in frontal and rollover crashes were 15.0(+/-0.7) and 22.6(+/-3.3), respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The mortality rate was higher in rollover crashes than in frontal crashes (p<0.05). The most common type of injury in unrestrained passengers during frontal and rollover crashes was head and face injury. In addition, chest and lumbar spine injuries were more common in rollover crashes than in frontal crashes, and this difference had statistical significance (p<0.05). The Injury Severity Score correlated with the crash patterns (rho=0.25, p<0.01), overspeeding (rho=0.44, p<0.01), prehospital care (rho=0.25, p<0.01), and alcohol consumption (rho=0.18, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: We estimate that rollover crashes are associated with an increased risk of injury to and death for frontseat passengers compared to frontal collisions. Knowledge of injury mechanisms should help emergency physicians to promptly evaluate all areas at risk, as well as the potential for fatality.
Alcohol Drinking ; Emergencies ; Head ; Humans ; Injury Severity Score ; Jeollabuk-do ; Mortality ; Police ; Seat Belts* ; Spine ; Thorax