1.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for the Management of Brain Tumor Patients During the Crisis Period: A Consensus Survey About Specific Clinical Scenarios (Version 2023.1)
Min-Sung KIM ; Se-Il GO ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Kyeong-O GO ; Sae Min KWON ; Woohyun KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Sung-Hye PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Sang Woo SONG ; Stephen AHN ; Hyuk-Jin OH ; Hong In YOON ; Sea-Won LEE ; Joo Ho LEE ; Kyung Rae CHO ; Jung Won CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2023;11(2):133-139
Background:
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there was a shortage of medical resources and the need for proper treatment guidelines for brain tumor patients became more pressing. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future. As part II of the guideline, this consensus survey is to suggest management options in specific clinical scenarios during the crisis period.
Methods:
The KSNO Guideline Working Group consisted of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to confirm a consensus reached by the experts, opinions on 5 specific clinical scenarios about the management of brain tumor patients during the crisis period were devised and asked. To build-up the consensus process, Delphi method was employed.
Results:
The summary of the final consensus from each scenario are as follows. For patients with newly diagnosed astrocytoma with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant and oligodendroglioma with IDH-mutant/1p19q codeleted, observation was preferred for patients with low-risk, World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) ≥60, while adjuvant radiotherapy alone was preferred for patients with high-risk, WHO grade 2, and KPS ≥60. For newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma, the most preferred adjuvant treatment strategy after surgery was radiotherapy plus temozolomide except for patients aged ≥70 years with KPS of 60 and unmethylated MGMT promoters. In patients with symptomatic brain metastasis, the preferred treatment differed according to the number of brain metastasis and performance status. For patients with newly diagnosed atypical meningioma, adjuvant radiation was deferred in patients with older age, poor performance status, complete resection, or low mitotic count.
Conclusion
It is imperative that proper medical care for brain tumor patients be sustained and provided, even during the crisis period. The findings of this consensus survey will be a useful reference in determining appropriate treatment options for brain tumor patients in the specific clinical scenarios covered by the survey during the future crisis.
2.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for the Management of Brain Tumor Patients During the Crisis Period: A Consensus Recommendation Using the Delphi Method (Version 2023.1)
Min-Sung KIM ; Se-Il GO ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Seok-Gu KANG ; Kyeong-O GO ; Sae Min KWON ; Woohyun KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Sung-Hye PARK ; Youngbeom SEO ; Sang Woo SONG ; Stephen AHN ; Hyuk-Jin OH ; Hong In YOON ; Sea-Won LEE ; Joo Ho LEE ; Kyung Rae CHO ; Jung Won CHOI ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Do Hoon LIM ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2023;11(2):123-132
Background:
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the need for appropriate treatment guidelines for patients with brain tumors was indispensable due to the lack and limitations of medical resources. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, has undertaken efforts to develop a guideline that is tailored to the domestic situation and that can be used in similar crisis situations in the future.
Methods:
The KSNO Guideline Working Group was composed of 22 multidisciplinary experts on neuro-oncology in Korea. In order to reach consensus among the experts, the Delphi method was used to build up the final recommendations.
Results:
All participating experts completed the series of surveys, and the results of final survey were used to draft the current consensus recommendations. Priority levels of surgery and radiotherapy during crises were proposed using appropriate time window-based criteria for management outcome. The highest priority for surgery is assigned to patients who are life-threatening or have a risk of significant impact on a patient’s prognosis unless immediate intervention is given within 24–48 hours. As for the radiotherapy, patients who are at risk of compromising their overall survival or neurological status within 4–6 weeks are assigned to the highest priority. Curative-intent chemotherapy has the highest priority, followed by neoadjuvant/adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy during a crisis period. Telemedicine should be actively considered as a management tool for brain tumor patients during the mass infection crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusion
It is crucial that adequate medical care for patients with brain tumors is maintained and provided, even during times of crisis. This guideline will serve as a valuable resource, assisting in the delivery of treatment to brain tumor patients in the event of any future crisis.
3.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
Seoyon YANG ; Jin-Woo PARK ; Kyunghoon MIN ; Yoon Se LEE ; Young-Jin SONG ; Seong Hee CHOI ; Doo Young KIM ; Seung Hak LEE ; Hee Seung YANG ; Wonjae CHA ; Ji Won KIM ; Byung-Mo OH ; Han Gil SEO ; Min-Wook KIM ; Hee-Soon WOO ; Sung-Jong PARK ; Sungju JEE ; Ju Sun OH ; Ki Deok PARK ; Young Ju JIN ; Sungjun HAN ; DooHan YOO ; Bo Hae KIM ; Hyun Haeng LEE ; Yeo Hyung KIM ; Min-Gu KANG ; Eun-Jae CHUNG ; Bo Ryun KIM ; Tae-Woo KIM ; Eun Jae KO ; Young Min PARK ; Hanaro PARK ; Min-Su KIM ; Jungirl SEOK ; Sun IM ; Sung-Hwa KO ; Seong Hoon LIM ; Kee Wook JUNG ; Tae Hee LEE ; Bo Young HONG ; Woojeong KIM ; Weon-Sun SHIN ; Young Chan LEE ; Sung Joon PARK ; Jeonghyun LIM ; Youngkook KIM ; Jung Hwan LEE ; Kang-Min AHN ; Jun-Young PAENG ; JeongYun PARK ; Young Ae SONG ; Kyung Cheon SEO ; Chang Hwan RYU ; Jae-Keun CHO ; Jee-Ho LEE ; Kyoung Hyo CHOI
Journal of the Korean Dysphagia Society 2023;13(2):77-106
Objective:
Dysphagia is a common clinical condition characterized by difficulty in swallowing. It is sub-classified into oropharyngeal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the mouth and pharynx, and esophageal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction. Dysphagia can have a significant negative impact one’s physical health and quality of life as its severity increases. Therefore, proper assessment and management of dysphagia are critical for improving swallowing function and preventing complications. Thus a guideline was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for assessment and management in patients with dysphagia.
Methods:
Nineteen key questions on dysphagia were developed. These questions dealt with various aspects of problems related to dysphagia, including assessment, management, and complications. A literature search for relevant articles was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and one domestic database of KoreaMed, until April 2021. The level of evidence and recommendation grade were established according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.
Results:
Early screening and assessment of videofluoroscopic swallowing were recommended for assessing the presence of dysphagia. Therapeutic methods, such as tongue and pharyngeal muscle strengthening exercises and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing therapy, were effective in improving swallowing function and quality of life in patients with dysphagia. Nutritional intervention and an oral care program were also recommended.
Conclusion
This guideline presents recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, including rehabilitative strategies.
4.A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial for Assessing the Usefulness of Suppressing Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Target Levels after Thyroid Lobectomy in Low to Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer Patients (MASTER): A Study Protocol
Eun Kyung LEE ; Yea Eun KANG ; Young Joo PARK ; Bon Seok KOO ; Ki-Wook CHUNG ; Eu Jeong KU ; Ho-Ryun WON ; Won Sang YOO ; Eonju JEON ; Se Hyun PAEK ; Yong Sang LEE ; Dong Mee LIM ; Yong Joon SUH ; Ha Kyoung PARK ; Hyo-Jeong KIM ; Bo Hyun KIM ; Mijin KIM ; Sun Wook KIM ; Ka Hee YI ; Sue K. PARK ; Eun-Jae JUNG ; June Young CHOI ; Ja Seong BAE ; Joon Hwa HONG ; Kee-Hyun NAM ; Young Ki LEE ; Hyeong Won YU ; Sujeong GO ; Young Mi KANG ;
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2021;36(3):574-581
Background:
Postoperative thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy is recommended for patients with intermediate- and high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer to prevent the recurrence of thyroid cancer. With the recent increase in small thyroid cancer cases, the extent of resection during surgery has generally decreased. Therefore, questions have been raised about the efficacy and long-term side effects of TSH suppression therapy in patients who have undergone a lobectomy.
Methods:
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial in which 2,986 patients with papillary thyroid cancer are randomized into a high-TSH group (intervention) and a low-TSH group (control) after having undergone a lobectomy. The principle of treatment includes a TSH-lowering regimen aimed at TSH levels between 0.3 and 1.99 μIU/mL in the low-TSH group. The high-TSH group targets TSH levels between 2.0 and 7.99 μIU/mL. The dose of levothyroxine will be adjusted at each visit to maintain the target TSH level. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival, as assessed by neck ultrasound every 6 to 12 months. Secondary endpoints include disease-free survival, overall survival, success rate in reaching the TSH target range, the proportion of patients with major cardiovascular diseases or bone metabolic disease, the quality of life, and medical costs. The follow-up period is 5 years.
Conclusion
The results of this trial will contribute to establishing the optimal indication for TSH suppression therapy in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients by evaluating the benefit and harm of lowering TSH levels in terms of recurrence, metabolic complications, costs, and quality of life.
5.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Antiepileptic Drug Usage of Brain Tumor: Version 2021.1
Jangsup MOON ; Min-Sung KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Jung Ho IM ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):9-15
Background:
To date, there has been no practical guidelines for the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in brain tumor patients in Korea. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for AED usage in brain tumors since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of the keywords.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. Prophylactic AED administration is not recommended in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients without previous seizure history. When AEDs are administered during peri/postoperative period, it may be tapered off according to the following recommendations. In seizure-naïve patients with no postoperative seizure, it is recommended to stop or reduce AED 1 week after surgery. In seizure-naïve patients with one early postoperative seizure (<1 week after surgery), it is advisable to maintain AED for at least 3 months before tapering. In seizure-naïve patients with ≥2 postoperative seizures or in patients with preoperative seizure history, it is recommended to maintain AEDs for more than 1 year. The possibility of drug interactions should be considered when selecting AEDs in brain tumor patients. Driving can be allowed in brain tumor patients when proven to be seizure-free for more than 1 year.
Conclusion
The KSNO suggests prescribing AEDs in patients with brain tumor based on the current guideline. This guideline will contribute to spreading evidence-based prescription of AEDs in brain tumor patients in Korea.
6.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Adult Diffuse Midline Glioma: Version 2021.1
Hong In YOON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Young Zoon KIM ; Youngbeom SEO ; Jung Ho IM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Je Beom HONG ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Seo Hee CHOI ; Min-Sung KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):1-8
Background:
There have been no guidelines for the management of adult patients with diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant in Korea since the 2016 revised WHO classification newly defined this disease entity. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for DMG since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. As ‘diffuse midline glioma’ was recently defined, and there was no international guideline, trials and guidelines of ‘diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma’ or ‘brain stem glioma’ were thoroughly reviewed first.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. The DMG can be diagnosed when all of the following three criteria are satisfied: the presence of the H3K27M mutation, midline location, and infiltrating feature. Without identification of H3K27M mutation by diagnostic biopsy, DMG cannot be diagnosed. For the primary treatment, maximal safe resection should be considered for tumors when feasible. Radiotherapy is the primary option for tumors in case the total resection is not possible. A total dose of 54 Gy to 60 Gy with conventional fractionation prescribed at 1-2 cm plus gross tumor volume is recommended. Although no chemotherapy has proven to be effective in DMG, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (± maintenance chemotherapy) with temozolomide following WHO grade IV glioblastoma’s protocol is recommended.
Conclusion
The detection of H3K27M mutation is the most important diagnostic criteria for DMG. Combination of surgery (if amenable to surgery), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on comprehensive multidisciplinary discussion can be considered as the treatment options for DMG.
7.A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial for Assessing the Usefulness of Suppressing Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Target Levels after Thyroid Lobectomy in Low to Intermediate Risk Thyroid Cancer Patients (MASTER): A Study Protocol
Eun Kyung LEE ; Yea Eun KANG ; Young Joo PARK ; Bon Seok KOO ; Ki-Wook CHUNG ; Eu Jeong KU ; Ho-Ryun WON ; Won Sang YOO ; Eonju JEON ; Se Hyun PAEK ; Yong Sang LEE ; Dong Mee LIM ; Yong Joon SUH ; Ha Kyoung PARK ; Hyo-Jeong KIM ; Bo Hyun KIM ; Mijin KIM ; Sun Wook KIM ; Ka Hee YI ; Sue K. PARK ; Eun-Jae JUNG ; June Young CHOI ; Ja Seong BAE ; Joon Hwa HONG ; Kee-Hyun NAM ; Young Ki LEE ; Hyeong Won YU ; Sujeong GO ; Young Mi KANG ;
Endocrinology and Metabolism 2021;36(3):574-581
Background:
Postoperative thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy is recommended for patients with intermediate- and high-risk differentiated thyroid cancer to prevent the recurrence of thyroid cancer. With the recent increase in small thyroid cancer cases, the extent of resection during surgery has generally decreased. Therefore, questions have been raised about the efficacy and long-term side effects of TSH suppression therapy in patients who have undergone a lobectomy.
Methods:
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial in which 2,986 patients with papillary thyroid cancer are randomized into a high-TSH group (intervention) and a low-TSH group (control) after having undergone a lobectomy. The principle of treatment includes a TSH-lowering regimen aimed at TSH levels between 0.3 and 1.99 μIU/mL in the low-TSH group. The high-TSH group targets TSH levels between 2.0 and 7.99 μIU/mL. The dose of levothyroxine will be adjusted at each visit to maintain the target TSH level. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival, as assessed by neck ultrasound every 6 to 12 months. Secondary endpoints include disease-free survival, overall survival, success rate in reaching the TSH target range, the proportion of patients with major cardiovascular diseases or bone metabolic disease, the quality of life, and medical costs. The follow-up period is 5 years.
Conclusion
The results of this trial will contribute to establishing the optimal indication for TSH suppression therapy in low-risk papillary thyroid cancer patients by evaluating the benefit and harm of lowering TSH levels in terms of recurrence, metabolic complications, costs, and quality of life.
8.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Antiepileptic Drug Usage of Brain Tumor: Version 2021.1
Jangsup MOON ; Min-Sung KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Jung Ho IM ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):9-15
Background:
To date, there has been no practical guidelines for the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in brain tumor patients in Korea. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for AED usage in brain tumors since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of the keywords.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. Prophylactic AED administration is not recommended in newly diagnosed brain tumor patients without previous seizure history. When AEDs are administered during peri/postoperative period, it may be tapered off according to the following recommendations. In seizure-naïve patients with no postoperative seizure, it is recommended to stop or reduce AED 1 week after surgery. In seizure-naïve patients with one early postoperative seizure (<1 week after surgery), it is advisable to maintain AED for at least 3 months before tapering. In seizure-naïve patients with ≥2 postoperative seizures or in patients with preoperative seizure history, it is recommended to maintain AEDs for more than 1 year. The possibility of drug interactions should be considered when selecting AEDs in brain tumor patients. Driving can be allowed in brain tumor patients when proven to be seizure-free for more than 1 year.
Conclusion
The KSNO suggests prescribing AEDs in patients with brain tumor based on the current guideline. This guideline will contribute to spreading evidence-based prescription of AEDs in brain tumor patients in Korea.
9.The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO) Guideline for Adult Diffuse Midline Glioma: Version 2021.1
Hong In YOON ; Chan Woo WEE ; Young Zoon KIM ; Youngbeom SEO ; Jung Ho IM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Je Beom HONG ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Seo Hee CHOI ; Min-Sung KIM ; Jangsup MOON ; Kihwan HWANG ; Ji Eun PARK ; Jin Mo CHO ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Min Ho LEE ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Do Hoon LIM ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2021;9(1):1-8
Background:
There have been no guidelines for the management of adult patients with diffuse midline glioma (DMG), H3K27M-mutant in Korea since the 2016 revised WHO classification newly defined this disease entity. Thus, the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO), a multidisciplinary academic society, had begun preparing guidelines for DMG since 2019.
Methods:
The Working Group was composed of 27 multidisciplinary medical experts in Korea.References were identified through searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL using specific and sensitive keywords as well as combinations of keywords. As ‘diffuse midline glioma’ was recently defined, and there was no international guideline, trials and guidelines of ‘diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma’ or ‘brain stem glioma’ were thoroughly reviewed first.
Results:
The core contents are as follows. The DMG can be diagnosed when all of the following three criteria are satisfied: the presence of the H3K27M mutation, midline location, and infiltrating feature. Without identification of H3K27M mutation by diagnostic biopsy, DMG cannot be diagnosed. For the primary treatment, maximal safe resection should be considered for tumors when feasible. Radiotherapy is the primary option for tumors in case the total resection is not possible. A total dose of 54 Gy to 60 Gy with conventional fractionation prescribed at 1-2 cm plus gross tumor volume is recommended. Although no chemotherapy has proven to be effective in DMG, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (± maintenance chemotherapy) with temozolomide following WHO grade IV glioblastoma’s protocol is recommended.
Conclusion
The detection of H3K27M mutation is the most important diagnostic criteria for DMG. Combination of surgery (if amenable to surgery), radiotherapy, and chemotherapy based on comprehensive multidisciplinary discussion can be considered as the treatment options for DMG.
10.A National Consensus Survey for Current Practicein Brain Tumor Management III: Brain Metastasis andPrimary Central Nervous System Lymphoma
Sung Kwon KIM ; Ji Eun PARK ; Kyung Hwan KIM ; Jin Mo CHO ; Jangsup MOON ; Wan-Soo YOON ; Se Hoon KIM ; Young Il KIM ; Young Zoon KIM ; Ho Sung KIM ; Yun-Sik DHO ; Jae-Sung PARK ; Hong In YOON ; Youngbeom SEO ; Kyoung Su SUNG ; Jin Ho SONG ; Chan Woo WEE ; Se-Hoon LEE ; Do Hoon LIM ; Jung Ho IM ; Jong Hee CHANG ; Myung-Hoon HAN ; Je Beom HONG ; Kihwan HWANG ; Chul-Kee PARK ; Youn Soo LEE ; Ho-Shin GWAK ;
Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2020;8(1):20-28
Background:
: The Guideline Working Group of the Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology (KSNO)conducted the nationwide questionnaire survey for diverse queries facing to treat patients with braintumor. As part III of the survey, the aim of this study is to evaluate the national patterns of clinical practicefor patients with brain metastasis and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).
Methods:
: A web-based survey was sent to all members of the KSNO by email. The survey included7 questions of brain metastasis and 5 questions of PCNSL, focused on the management strategiesin specific situations. All questions were developed by consensus of the Guideline WorkingGroup.
Results:
" In the survey about brain metastasis, respondents preferred surgical resection withadjuvant treatment for patients with a surgically accessible single brain metastatic lesion less than 3cm in size without extracranial systemic lesions. However, most respondents considered radiosurgeryfor surgically inaccessible lesions. As the preferred treatment of multiple brain metastases according tothe number of brain lesions, respondents tended to choose radiotherapy with increasing number of lesions.Radiosurgery was mostly chosen for the brain metastases of less than or equal to 4. In the surveyabout PCNSL, a half of respondents choose high-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy asthe first-line induction therapy for PCNSL. The consolidation and salvage therapy showed a little variationamong respondents. For PCNSL patients with cerebrospinal fluid dissemination, intrathecal chemotherapywas most preferred.
Conclusion
: The survey demonstrates the prevailing clinical practice patterns for patients withbrain metastasis and PCNSL among members of the KSNO. This information provides a point of referencefor establishing a practical guideline in the management of brain metastasis and PCNSL.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail