2.Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
Armen Yuri GASPARYAN ; Marlen YESSIRKEPOV ; Svetlana N DIYANOVA ; George D KITAS
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(8):1010-1016
Publishing scholarly articles in traditional and newly-launched journals is a responsible task, requiring diligence from authors, reviewers, editors, and publishers. The current generation of scientific authors has ample opportunities for publicizing their research. However, they have to selectively target journals and publish in compliance with the established norms of publishing ethics. Over the past few years, numerous illegitimate or predatory journals have emerged in most fields of science. By exploiting gold Open Access publishing, these journals paved the way for low-quality articles that threatened to change the landscape of evidence-based science. Authors, reviewers, editors, established publishers, and learned associations should be informed about predatory publishing practices and contribute to the trustworthiness of scholarly publications. In line with this, there have been several attempts to distinguish legitimate and illegitimate journals by blacklisting unethical journals (the Jeffrey Beall's list), issuing a statement on transparency and best publishing practices (the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association's and other global organizations' draft document), and tightening the indexing criteria by the Directory of Open Access Journals. None of these measures alone turned to be sufficient. All stakeholders of science communication should be aware of multiple facets of unethical practices and publish well-checked and evidence-based articles.
Communication
;
Disclosure/*ethics
;
*Ethics, Research
;
Fraud/*ethics
;
Information Dissemination/*ethics
;
Medical Writing
;
Periodicals as Topic/ethics
;
Publishing/*ethics
;
Science/*ethics
3.Management and Ethics of Biobank; Biorepository.
Bong Kyung SHIN ; Jung Woo CHOI ; Hyunjuu LEE ; Aree KIM ; Insun KIM ; Han Kyeom KIM
Korean Journal of Pathology 2005;39(6):372-378
Research access to a large number of high-quality biospecimen, adequately annotated and ethically acquired, is critical to an improved understanding of disease and ultimately new development of effective diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. Therefore, the importance of biobanking is widely recognized within the life science and healthcare communities. Resolution of the ethical issues, including informed consent, confidentiality and institutional review board approval, are probably the most important task to every biobank or biorepository. In Korea, the new, very strict ethical act on research, issued in 2005, requires researchers as well as biorepositories to know how they use or run a biorepository ethically without damaging the right of human subjects who gave the repository their biospecimen.
Biological Science Disciplines
;
Confidentiality
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Ethics Committees, Research
;
Ethics*
;
Humans
;
Informed Consent
;
Korea
4.Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.
Armen Yuri GASPARYAN ; Marlen YESSIRKEPOV ; Alexander A VORONOV ; Alexey N GERASIMOV ; Elena I KOSTYUKOVA ; George D KITAS
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2015;30(11):1545-1552
Citations to scholarly items are building bricks for multidisciplinary science communication. Citation analyses are currently influencing individual career advancement and ranking of academic and research institutions worldwide. This article overviews the involvement of scientific authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, indexers, and learned associations in the citing and referencing to preserve the integrity of science communication. Authors are responsible for thorough bibliographic searches to select relevant references for their articles, comprehend main points, and cite them in an ethical way. Reviewers and editors may perform additional searches and recommend missing essential references. Publishers, in turn, are in a position to instruct their authors over the citations and references, provide tools for validation of references, and open access to bibliographies. Publicly available reference lists bear important information about the novelty and relatedness of the scholarly items with the published literature. Few editorial associations have dealt with the issue of citations and properly managed references. As a prime example, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) issued in December 2014 an updated set of recommendations on the need for citing primary literature and avoiding unethical references, which are applicable to the global scientific community. With the exponential growth of literature and related references, it is critically important to define functions of all stakeholders of science communication in curbing the issue of irrational and unethical citations and thereby improve the quality and indexability of scholarly journals.
Authorship/standards
;
*Bibliography as Topic
;
*Editorial Policies
;
Information Dissemination/ethics
;
Peer Review, Research/ethics/*standards
;
Periodicals as Topic/ethics/*standards
;
Publishing/ethics/*standards
;
Quality Control
;
Science/ethics/standards
;
Writing/*standards
5.Demands and challenges of modern medicine.
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2007;36(8):698-701
Modern medicine, characterised by the enormous impact of rapid advances in science and technology, has vastly enhanced the doctor's professional capabilities and has made the practice of medicine more intellectually challenging as well as professionally satisfying. It has also made medicine more complex and demanding. In addition to having to keep pace with rapid medical advances, the doctor has to deal with 1) the issue of sorting the wheat from the chaff out of the deluge of new drugs and equipment presented to him, 2) the issue of rationing and determining priorities within the limits of finite resources, 3) the issue of appropriate response to new ethical challenges presented by the application of new technologies and 4) the issue of maintaining the human face of medicine in the context of growing presence and impact of technology. As doctors, we have the responsibility to ensure that through steadfast commitment to professionalism, through wisdom and insight we can harvest and maximise the vast potential of technology in caring for our patients. This is a challenge we must accept in the cause of our patients' welfare, the paramount concern of our professional creed.
Delivery of Health Care
;
ethics
;
organization & administration
;
Diffusion of Innovation
;
Drugs, Investigational
;
Humans
;
Medical Laboratory Science
;
Physicians
;
Singapore
6.Social competencies of Korean doctors.
Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2014;57(2):114-120
'Social competence' is understood in behavioral science and developmental psychology to be a bundle of diverse social skills that are necessary for appropriate social adaptation. However, a physician's social competence in our healthcare context should be understood as clinically necessary skills that are not directly related to understanding of the natural sciences essential for clinical practice. In Korea, such 'non-science competencies' have long been ignored by both doctors and laypeople in their understanding of medicine as a discipline. However, the clinical practice should embrace the centrality of humane and social elements, without which medicine could not exist. Our research team has proposed 6 competencies in light of the current Korean healthcare context and circumstances: understanding of the related law and healthcare system, professionalism and ethics, leadership, self-management, communication, and understanding of the humanities. These competencies are important to current medical practice in Korea and should be developed and promoted among doctors in the present and future. Of course, these competencies are not absolutely fixed or unchangeable. They should be re-interpreted or modified as time passes and the healthcare context changes. However, for the time being, these competencies will provide some guidance for educating doctors and promoting dialogue among related stakeholders in the healthcare field.
Behavioral Sciences
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Ethics
;
Humanities
;
Humans
;
Jurisprudence
;
Korea
;
Leadership
;
Mental Competency
;
Natural Science Disciplines
;
Psychology
;
Self Care
7.Contents of Health Education for Pupils and the Perceptibility after Graduation of Primary School.
Korean Journal of Preventive Medicine 1985;18(1):99-112
It was measured to check the state of health education by the survey of the items related to the health with first grade of students in middle school who mastered elementary courses. Totally 50 questions, which were selected from Standard and Dong-A reference books, were given to teachers and have got answered by the students who were totally 959(491 from urban areas and 468 from rural areas). It's done just after they entered middle school for a month, from April 10 to may 10, 1984. There were totally 782 items of health in all subjects of all grades. In contents, the most cases were about mental and emotional health(17.7%), exercise and rest(15.1%), environmental health, health life, personal health care, nutrition and foods, social health and organization, physiology and anatomy, statistics of public health population problem, disease and care, food sanitation, school health, parasitic and communicable disease control, eugenics and heredity(0.4%), etc were followed. In subjects, Korean language had 44.7% of mental emotional health in 114 cases, arithmetics 46.4% of statistics of public health in 26, sociology, 23.1% of environmental health in 118, natural science, 60.1% of physiology and anatomy in 30, ethics, 40.3% of mental and emotional health in 176, music, 21.8% of mental and emotional health and accidents in 23, art, 42.9% of exercise and rest in 28, physical education, 38.6% of exercise and rest in 201, practical course, 36.2% of nutrition and foods in 61, and there was nothing but only one case in Korean history. Subjects in total cases of health informing items are below: Physical education 25.8%, ethics 22.5%, sociology 15.1%, Korean language 14.6%, practical course 7.8%, natural science 3.8%, art 3.6%, arithmetics 3.3%, music 2.9%, Korean history 0.6%. Grades in total cases of health informing items are belows: the sixth grade 29.1%, the fourth grade 21.2%, the fifth grade 18.9%, the third grade 11.6%, the first grade 11.5%, the second grade 7.7%. The sections related to health matters were average 35.4%. According to the grades, the fourth and the sixth grade were 38.2% each other, the highest, and the second grade was 29.3%, the lowest. All sections in physical education included them. The acceptability to the knowledge for health was belows: 56.3% in urban students and 53.9% in rural students. There was some difference in acceptability between two parties (p<0.005).
Communicable Disease Control
;
Delivery of Health Care
;
Environmental Health
;
Ethics
;
Eugenics
;
Health Education*
;
Humans
;
Music
;
Natural Science Disciplines
;
Physical Education and Training
;
Physiology
;
Public Health
;
Pupil*
;
Reference Books
;
Sanitation
;
School Health Services
;
Sociology