1.Palliative Care and Cancer Notification
Sayaka WATANABE ; Eiichi YABATA ; Haruko ITO ; Masako TSURUMI ; Mieko SUZUKI ; Rie SAKURAI ; Naoko KODA ; Naoe AMAGAI ; Toshihiko HUKUOKA ; Hiroyuki OKAMOTO
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2010;58(5):563-568
In our hospital the palliative care committee has been held once a month since 2000. In 2007, a total of 1,583 cancer patients were admitted to our hospital orreceived medical care at home. The average length of hospital stay was 24 days. Of the total number of patients, 88.4% was informed that they had cancer. In the latter half of the year it increased to 92.6% because the palliative caretakers gave doctors accurate information on patients' psychology and social background. In October 2007 a questionnaire survey was conducted on those who visited our palliative care section on the occasion of the hospital festival. A total of 46 responded to our survey about the knowledge of palliative care, physician's precise explanation about the illness, image of opioids, desirable place of death and so on. Twenty-eight respondents (60.9%) did not know anything about palliative care. Forty-four (95.7%) wanted precise explanation of cancer. Thirty-four (73.9%) said they had had a night image of opioids after reading the panel. Twenty-eight (60.9%) responded they would rather stay at home until death. We should give healthy people more information about palliative care and opioids.
2.Development and Evaluation of a Consolidated Drug Information Management and Sharing System
Kenichiro NAGATA ; Toshikazu TSUJI ; Kayoko MURAOKA ; Hiroko YONEMITSU ; Rie HISAMITSU ; Sayaka MAI ; Kosuke HASHIMOTO ; Shoko TSUKINOKI ; Hiroyuki WATANABE ; Akiko KANAYA ; Nobuaki EGASHIRA
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics 2020;22(2):83-90
Objective: In this study, we aimed to develop a new system that can centrally manage and share drug information, and also evaluated its usefulness.Methods: Using PHP v5.3.3 as the programming language and MySQL v5.1.73 as the database, we built a web application that constantly runs on the server. Various drug information was registered in this system, and its usage status was analyzed based on the access log.Results: The system was accessed 31,678 times during the survey period (October 1 to December 31, 2019). The information sought included: basic drug information (ordering category of drugs, dosage forms and strengths, drug price, etc.) (13,962 times, 44.1%),question and answer records (7,221 times, 22.8%), pharmaceutical documents (package inserts, interview forms, documents regarding compatibility of injections, etc.) (7,172 times, 22.6%), notifications regarding new and discontinued drugs (727 times, 2.3%), websites (676 times, 2.1%), PreAVOID reports (663 times, 2.1%), pharmaceutical safety information (525 times, 1.7%), information regarding off-label drug use (409 times, 1.3%), and bibliographic information and guidelines (323 times, 1.0%). Among the users (62 pharmacists), 59.7% accessed the system only via a personal computer (PC), 38.7% via a PC and smart device (smartphone or tablet),and 1.6% via only a smart device. The median number of accesses to this system was significantly higher in pharmacists in charge of wards (190 [9-1,435]) or drug information (3,750 [2,957-5,548]) than dispensing pharmacists (68.5 [3-193]) (p<0.001).Conclusion: This system allowed the central management and sharing of various drug information on the web, permitting access regardless of device type. Since this system was frequently used by pharmacists in charge of wards or drug information, this system was considered particularly useful in hospital pharmacist ward services and drug information services.