Background: Pneumatization of turbinates, also known as concha bullosa (CB), is associated with nasal septal deviation and sinonasal pathologies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of deep learning models in detecting CB in coronal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: Standardized coronal images were obtained from 203 CBCT scans (83 with CB and 119 without CB) from the radiology archives of a dental teaching hospital. These scans underwent preprocessing through a hybridized contrast enhancement (CE) method using discrete wavelet transform (DWT). Of the 203 CBCT images, 162 were randomly assigned to the training set and 41 to the testing set. Initially, the images were enhanced using a CE technique before being input into pre-trained deep learning models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, and MobileNet. The features extracted by each model were then flattened and input into a random forest (RF) classifier. In the subsequent phase, the CE technique was refined by incorporating DWT. Results: CE-DWT-ResNet101-RF demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of 91.7% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 98%. In contrast, CE-MobileNet-RF recorded the lowest accuracy at 82.46% and an AUC of 92%. The highest precision, recall, and F1 score (all 92%) were observed for CE-DWT-ResNet101-RF. Conclusion Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy in detecting CB in CBCT images. However, to confirm these results, further studies involving larger sample sizes and various deep learning models are required.

Background: Pneumatization of turbinates, also known as concha bullosa (CB), is associated with nasal septal deviation and sinonasal pathologies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of deep learning models in detecting CB in coronal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: Standardized coronal images were obtained from 203 CBCT scans (83 with CB and 119 without CB) from the radiology archives of a dental teaching hospital. These scans underwent preprocessing through a hybridized contrast enhancement (CE) method using discrete wavelet transform (DWT). Of the 203 CBCT images, 162 were randomly assigned to the training set and 41 to the testing set. Initially, the images were enhanced using a CE technique before being input into pre-trained deep learning models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, and MobileNet. The features extracted by each model were then flattened and input into a random forest (RF) classifier. In the subsequent phase, the CE technique was refined by incorporating DWT. Results: CE-DWT-ResNet101-RF demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of 91.7% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 98%. In contrast, CE-MobileNet-RF recorded the lowest accuracy at 82.46% and an AUC of 92%. The highest precision, recall, and F1 score (all 92%) were observed for CE-DWT-ResNet101-RF. Conclusion Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy in detecting CB in CBCT images. However, to confirm these results, further studies involving larger sample sizes and various deep learning models are required.

Background: Pneumatization of turbinates, also known as concha bullosa (CB), is associated with nasal septal deviation and sinonasal pathologies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of deep learning models in detecting CB in coronal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Methods: Standardized coronal images were obtained from 203 CBCT scans (83 with CB and 119 without CB) from the radiology archives of a dental teaching hospital. These scans underwent preprocessing through a hybridized contrast enhancement (CE) method using discrete wavelet transform (DWT). Of the 203 CBCT images, 162 were randomly assigned to the training set and 41 to the testing set. Initially, the images were enhanced using a CE technique before being input into pre-trained deep learning models, namely ResNet50, ResNet101, and MobileNet. The features extracted by each model were then flattened and input into a random forest (RF) classifier. In the subsequent phase, the CE technique was refined by incorporating DWT. Results: CE-DWT-ResNet101-RF demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of 91.7% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 98%. In contrast, CE-MobileNet-RF recorded the lowest accuracy at 82.46% and an AUC of 92%. The highest precision, recall, and F1 score (all 92%) were observed for CE-DWT-ResNet101-RF. Conclusion Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy in detecting CB in CBCT images. However, to confirm these results, further studies involving larger sample sizes and various deep learning models are required.

This systematic review evaluates current evidence regarding the feasibility of using needleless jet injection instead of a conventional local anesthetic needle. EBSCO, ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus databases were used to identify relevant literature published in English from 2005 to 2020. Ten studies were selected. Five of them were randomized clinical trials, 3 case-control studies, and 2 equivalence trials. Using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist, 6 studies scored between 67% and 100%, and 4 studies scored between 34% and 66%. According to Jadad’s scale, 2 studies were considered strong, and 8 studies were considered moderate in quality. The results of the 10 studies showed differences in patient preference for needleless jet injection. Needleless injection technique has been found to be particularly useful in uncooperative patients with anxiety and needle phobia.Needleless jet injection is not technique sensitive. However, with needleless jet anesthesia, most treatments require additional anesthesia. Conventional needle anesthesia is less costly, has a longer duration of action, and has better pain control during dental extraction. Needleless jet anesthesia has been shown to be moderately accepted by patients with a fear of needles, has a faster onset of action, and is an efficient alternative to conventional infiltration anesthesia technique.