1.Aortic Valve Replacement in a Case of Anomalous Origin of the Right Coronary Artery
Nozomi Kojima ; Satoshi Ito ; Arata Muraoka ; Hiroaki Konishi ; Yoshio Misawa
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2011;40(1):10-13
Congenital anomalies of the coronary artery are rare. However, they can cause sudden death because of arrhythmia. We present a case of a 62-year-old man with severe aortic valve regurgitation associated with an anomalous origin of a narrowed right coronary artery (IB2 according to the Shirani Classification) detected on preoperative coronary three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) . The patient underwent both aortic valve replacement for aortic regurgitation, and coronary artery bypass. The postoperative course was uneventful.
2.Verification of surgical factors affecting the efficiency of stone extraction with one-surgeon basketing technique using a f-URSL simulation model
Ryusuke DEGUCHI ; Shimpei YAMASHITA ; Yuya IWAHASHI ; Hiroki KAWABATA ; Satoshi MURAOKA ; Takahito WAKAMIYA ; Yasuo KOHJIMOTO ; Isao HARA
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):351-360
Purpose:
Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique.
Materials and Methods:
This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task.
Results:
The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01).
Conclusions
The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.
3.Verification of surgical factors affecting the efficiency of stone extraction with one-surgeon basketing technique using a f-URSL simulation model
Ryusuke DEGUCHI ; Shimpei YAMASHITA ; Yuya IWAHASHI ; Hiroki KAWABATA ; Satoshi MURAOKA ; Takahito WAKAMIYA ; Yasuo KOHJIMOTO ; Isao HARA
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):351-360
Purpose:
Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique.
Materials and Methods:
This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task.
Results:
The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01).
Conclusions
The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.
4.Verification of surgical factors affecting the efficiency of stone extraction with one-surgeon basketing technique using a f-URSL simulation model
Ryusuke DEGUCHI ; Shimpei YAMASHITA ; Yuya IWAHASHI ; Hiroki KAWABATA ; Satoshi MURAOKA ; Takahito WAKAMIYA ; Yasuo KOHJIMOTO ; Isao HARA
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):351-360
Purpose:
Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique.
Materials and Methods:
This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task.
Results:
The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01).
Conclusions
The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.
5.Verification of surgical factors affecting the efficiency of stone extraction with one-surgeon basketing technique using a f-URSL simulation model
Ryusuke DEGUCHI ; Shimpei YAMASHITA ; Yuya IWAHASHI ; Hiroki KAWABATA ; Satoshi MURAOKA ; Takahito WAKAMIYA ; Yasuo KOHJIMOTO ; Isao HARA
Investigative and Clinical Urology 2024;65(4):351-360
Purpose:
Stone extraction is an important treatment option when performing flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (f-URSL) for upper urinary stones. We used a f-URSL simulator model to investigate surgical factors affecting the efficacy of stone extraction with the one-surgeon basketing technique.
Materials and Methods:
This simulator-based study involved eight urologists and eight residents. These participants each performed two tasks, with Flexor (Cook Medical) and Navigator (Boston Scientific) ureteral access sheaths, with and without the M-arm (MC Medical) single-use basket holder, and with models representing both left and right kidneys. The two tasks were to touch each renal calix with the ureteroscope, and to extract stones. As outcomes, we recorded the number of times that the ureteroscope became stuck during insertion, the number of times a stone was dropped during removal, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and the time required to accomplish each task.
Results:
The ureteroscope became stuck significantly more often when Navigator was used compared with Flexor overall, and for both urologists and residents (all p<0.01). Stones were dropped significantly more often on the ipsilateral side (kidney on the same side as the operator’s hand) than on the contralateral side overall (p=0.01), and the basket forceps were opened and closed significantly more often on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side both overall and by residents (all p<0.01).
Conclusions
The efficiency of stone extraction during f-URSL with the one-surgeon basketing technique was affected by differences in ureteral access sheath and the kidney side.