1.Influence of Psychotropic Pro Re Nata Drug Use on Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Schizophrenia
Yoshitaka KYOU ; Satoru OISHI ; Takeya TAKIZAWA ; Yuki YOSHIMURA ; Itsuki HASHIMOTO ; Ryutaro SUZUKI ; Reina DEMIZU ; Tsuyoshi ONO ; Yuka NOGUCHI ; Tomohiko KIMURA ; Ken INADA ; Hitoshi MIYAOKA
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2023;21(2):332-339
Objective:
In the treatment of patients with schizophrenia, pro re nata (PRN) drugs are commonly prescribed for medical indications such as agitation, acute psychiatric symptoms, insomnia, and anxiety. However, high-quality evidence supporting the use of PRN medications is lacking, and these drugs are administered on the basis of clinical experience and habits. Therefore, the actual use of psychotropic PRN drugs and its influence on the patients’ outcomes need to be investigated.
Methods:
This study included 205 patients who underwent inpatient treatment for schizophrenia. We investigated the prescription of psychotropic drugs before admission and at discharge, as well as the dosing frequency of PRN drugs during hospitalization. We also examined the influence of psychotropic PRN drug use on hospitalization days, antipsychotic polypharmacy, and readmission rates.
Results:
Patients who used psychotropic PRN drugs during hospitalization had significantly longer hospitalization days (p = 7.5 × 10−4 ) and significantly higher rates of antipsychotic polypharmacy (p = 2.4 × 10−4 ) at discharge than those who did not use psychotropic PRN drugs. Moreover, a higher number of psychotropic PRN drugs used per day was associated with higher readmission rates within 3 months of discharge (p = 4.4 × 10−3 ).
Conclusion
Psychotropic PRN drug use is associated with prolonged hospitalization, antipsychotic polypharmacy, and increased readmission rates in inpatients with schizophrenia. Therefore, psychiatric symptoms should be stabilized with regularly prescribed medications without the extensive use of psychotropic PRN drugs. Moreover, a system for monitoring and reexamining PRN drug use needs to be established.
2.Ongoing increase in measles cases following importations, Japan, March 2014: times of challenge and opportunity
Takuri Takahashi ; Yuzo Arima ; Hitomi Kinoshita ; Kazuhiko Kanou ; Takehito Saitoh ; Tomimasa Sunagawa ; Hiroaki Ito ; Atsuhiro Kanayama ; AyakoTabuchi ; Kazutoshi Nakashima ; Yuichiro Yahata ; Takuya Yamagishi ; Tamie Sugawara ; Yasushi Ohkusa ; Tamano Matsui ; Satoru Arai ; Hiroshi Satoh ; Keiko Tanaka-Taya ; Katsuhiro Komase ; Makoto Takeda ; Kazunori Oishi
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response 2014;5(2):31-33
Since late 2013 through March 2014, Japan experienced a rapid rise in measles cases. Here, we briefly report on the ongoing situation and share preliminarily findings, concerns and challenges and the public health actions needed over the coming months and years.
Measles is a notifiable disease in Japan based on nationwide case-based surveillance legally requiring physicians to report all clinically diagnosed and laboratory-confirmed cases within seven days, but preferably within 24 hours. After a large outbreak in 2007–2008 (more than 11 000 cases reported in 2008 alone) and a goal of elimination by April 2015, a catch-up programme using the bivalent measles-rubella (MR) vaccine was offered for grades seven and 12 (ages 12–13 and 17–18 years) from April 2008 through March 2013. During this period, there was an estimated 97% decline in measles notifications, and the cumulative number of reported cases has been steadily declining over the last five years (732 cases in 2009, 447 cases in 2010, 439 cases in 2011, 293 cases in 2012 and 232 cases in 2013). However, since late 2013 through March 2014, the country experienced a resurgence only a year after a large rubella outbreak.
3.Exposure to H1 genotype measles virus at an international airport in Japan on 31 July 2016 results in a measles outbreak
Aika Watanabe ; Yusuke Kobayashi ; Tomoe Shimada ; Yuichiro Yahata ; Ayako Kobayashi ; Mizue Kanai ; Yushi Hachisu ; Munehisa Fukusumi ; Hajime Kamiya ; Takuri Takahashi ; Yuzo Arima ; Hitomi Kinoshita ; Kazuhiko Kanou ; Takehito Saitoh ; Satoru Arai ; Hiroshi Satoh ; Hideo Okuno ; Saeko Morino ; Tamano Matsui ; Tomimasa Sunagawa ; Keiko Tanaka-Taya ; Makoto Takeda ; Katsuhiro Komase ; Kazunori Oishi
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response 2017;8(1):37-39