Objective To investigate the clinical value of ureteroscopy combined with ESWL for the treatment of ureteral stone.Methods From October 2005 to June 2007,a total of 256 patients with ureteral stones were treated in our hospital.The calculus in the middle and lower ureter were removed by ureteroscopy,while the stones in the upper ureter was treated by ESWL.For the cases that failed ureteroscopy or those who had residual stones after the treatment,ESWL was performed as a supplement.ResultsIn the patients with lower ureteral stones,the one-stage cure rate was 98.2%(167/170),while in those with middle and upper ureteral calculi,the rate was 89.2%(50/56) and 73.3%(22/30) respectively.Three patients developed perforation of the ureter during the surgery,and one had mucosal injury of the ureter.One case was converted to open surgery because of perforation of the ureter resulted from ureteral twist.Twelve patients were failed ureteroscopy or had residual stones,and received ESWL as the second-stage treatment,11(91.7%) of them were cured afterwards.Conclusions Ureteroscopy is effective for middle and lower ureteral stones.For the cases failed the operation or have residual calculi,ESWL is a good choice.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of immunonutrition support in perioperative period of hepatectomy. Methods: Literatures were researched using CNKI，CBM，Wanfang database，VIP databases，PubMed (Medline)，Embase，Web of science，Science Direct，Cochrane Center from January 1996 to March 2018 with the key words including "肝切除术，免疫营养，hepatectomy，hepatic resection，immunonutrition，immunoenhanced nutrition" . The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on comparison of efficacy of immunonutrition support versus routine nutritional support in perioperative period of hepatectomy. Patients in the immunonutrition group received immunonutrition support in perioperative period of hepatectomy，and patients in the routine nutrition group received routine nutritional support in perioperative period of hepatectomy. Outcome measures：overall incidence of postoperative complications，incidence of postoperative infectious complications，incidence of postoperative liver failure，perioperative mortality，hospital stay，and hospitalization expenses. Literatures screening，data extraction and quality assessment of methodology were conducted by two researchers separately. Count data were represented as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Measurement data were represented as mean difference (MD) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95%CI. Heterogeneity of the included studies was analyzed with I². Funnel plot was used to test potential publication bias if the number of studies included ≥ 10，and funnel plot was used to test potential publication bias for the outcome measures with the maximum number of studies if the number of studies included <10. Results: (1) Document retrival: 12 RCTs were enrolled in the Meta analysis, and the total sample size was 1 136 patients, including 568 patients in the immunonutrition group and in the routine nutrition group, respectively. (2) Results of Meta-analysis: the that immunonutrition group had lower overall incidence of postoperative complications, incidence of postoperative infectious complications, incidence of postoperative liver failure, and hospital stay (RR=0.57, 0.49, 0.30, MD=-3.28, 95%CI: 0.46-0.71, 0.37-0.65, 0.12-0.74, -4.45 to -2.11, P<0.05), and higher hospital expenses (MD=11.86, 95%CI: 10.96-12.77, P<0.05) compared with the routine nutrition group. There was no significant difference in the perioperative mortality between the two groups (RR=0.26, 95%CI: 0.07-1.05, P>0.05). The bilateral symmetry was presented in the funnel plot based on the 9 studies comparing incidence of postoperative infectious complications between the immunonutrition group and routine nutrition group, suggesting that publication bias had little influence on results of Meta-analysis. Conclusions Perioperative immunonutrition support for hepatectomy is safe and feasible. Compared with routine nutritional support, immunonutrition support can significantly reduce overall incidence of postoperative complications, incidence of postoperative infectious complications, incidence of postoperative liver failure, and shorten the hospital stay without increasing postoperative mortality.