1.Congenital mullerian anomaly: transverse vaginal septum with cervico-vaginal agenesis in vacterl syndrome
Philippine Journal of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility 2004;1(1):21-25
A case of a 14 years old student diagnosed with congenital mullerian anomaly.
Human
;
Female
;
Adolescent
;
VACTERL ASSOCIATION
;
MULLERIAN DUCTS
;
ABNORMALITIES
2.Relationship of diabetic retinopathy with ankle brachial index and microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetics.
Emerson Jay B. Molina ; Ronald A. Yutangco ; Maria Angela S. Cruz-Anacleto ; Jennifer Doria-Del Castillo ; Patricia J. Aguinod-Cheng
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology 2014;39(1):12-15
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the relationship of diabetic retinopathy with ankle/brachial (ABI) scores and the presence of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients.
METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study of type 2 diabetic patients, aged 40-85 years, were recruited from the outpatient department of a tertiary hospital. Ankle/brachial index scores and the presence of microalbuminuria were determined. The presence and stage of diabetic retinopathy were assessed through contact lens biomicroscopy.
RESULTS: There were 49 patients who participated in the study. Significant associations between severe diabeticretinopathy and abnormal ABI scores (p = 0.01) and the presence of microalbuminuria (p=0.01) were found.
CONCLUSION: Patients with severe diabetic retinopathy were more likely to have abnormal ankle/brachial index scores and microalbuminuria. Thus, those presenting with severe diabetic retinopathy were not only at risk of losing their sight but also at higher risk of developing life-threatening systemic vascular and renal complications of diabetes.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Aged 80 And Over ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Ankle Brachial Index ; Diabetic Retinopathy ; Ankle ; Albuminuria ; Ankle Joint ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
3.Measurement of accommodative amplitude using wavefront aberrometer.
Robert Edward T. Ang ; Jennifer Aurea S. Sarmiento ; Jocelyn Therese M. Remo ; Gladness Henna A. Martinez ; Lilette Marie B. Canilao
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology 2015;40(1):3-10
OBJECTIVE: To measure and compare the accommodative amplitude of Filipino patients with different accommodative conditions using a wavefront aberrometer.
METHODS: A total of 120 eyes of 67 patients seen in a private eye center were included and divided into two groups (phakic and pseudophakic). After undergoing routine ophthalmologic examination that included manifest refraction and visual acuity testing, accomodative amplitude was measured using the iTraceTM wavefront aberrometer. Comparison of the measurements was made between the accommodative amplitude of phakic pre-presbyopes and presbyopes, and between eyes implanted with monofocal and accommodating intraocular lenses (IOLs).
RESULTS: The mean age of the pre-presbyopes was 27 years, presbyopes 50 years, monofocal IOL 69 years and accommodating IOL 67 years. The mean accommodative amplitude of the pre-presbyopes was 1.64 ± 1.06D, presbyopes 0.99 ± 0.42D, monofocal IOL 0.36 ± 1.16D, and accommodating IOL 0.94 ± 0.89D. The pre-presbyopes had a higher accommodative amplitude than the presbyopes (p=0.008), while the accommodating IOL subgroup had a higher amplitude than the monofocal IOL subgroup (p=0.02). Increasing age was correlated with decreasing amplitude in the phakic group (r2=0.926). There was no correlation between refractive error and amplitude of accommodation in the phakic and pseudophakic groups (r2=0.02 for both groups).
CONCLUSION: The wavefront aberrometer is a reliable tool in objectively measuring accommodative amplitude. Pre-presbyopes and accommodating IOLs were shown to have higher amplitudes of accommodation than presbyopes and monofocal IOLs.
Human ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Accommodation, Ocular ; Presbyopia ; Visual Acuity ; Refractive Errors
4.Direct Puncture of the Superficial Temporal Artery in Embolization of a Scalp Arteriovenous Fistula: A Case Report
Gregory B. WALKER ; Alick P. WANG ; Jeremiah HADWEN ; Undrakh-Erdene ERDENEBOLD ; Razmik BEBEDJIAN ; Patrick SULLIVAN ; Marlise P. SANTOS ; Chad CHENIER ; Stephen KARWASKI ; Katie CARON ; Gabriella VARGA ; Jennifer LYON ; Howard J. LESIUK ; Navraj HERAN ; Manraj HERAN ; Aiman QUATEEN ; Brian J. DRAKE ; Eduardo Portela De OLIVEIRA ; Mario KONTOLEMOS ; Robert FAHED
Neurointervention 2023;18(1):67-71
We describe a minimally invasive endovascular approach to treat an arteriovenous fistula of the scalp. We performed a direct puncture of the lesion through the patient’s scalp for liquid embolic agent injection along with external compression of the superficial temporal artery to perform a “manual pressure-cooker technique.” The combination of these minimally invasive techniques resulted in an excellent clinical and radiographic outcome.
5.Management of isolated mandibular body fractures in adults
José ; Florencio F. Lapeñ ; a, Jr. ; Joselito F. David ; Ann Nuelli B. Acluba - Pauig ; Jehan Grace B. Maglaya ; Enrico Micael G. Donato ; Francis V. Roasa ; Philip B. Fullante ; Jose Rico A. Antonio ; Ryan Neil C. Adan ; Arsenio L. Pascual III ; Jennifer M. de Silva- Leonardo ; Mark Anthony T. Gomez ; Isaac Cesar S. De Guzman ; Veronica Jane B. Yanga ; Irlan C. Altura ; Dann Joel C. Caro ; Karen Mae A. Ty ; Elmo . R. Lago Jr ; Joy Celyn G. Ignacio ; Antonio Mario L. de Castro ; Policarpio B. Joves Jr. ; Alejandro V. Pineda Jr. ; Edgardo Jose B. Tan ; Tita Y. Cruz ; Eliezer B. Blanes ; Mario E. Esquillo ; Emily Rose M. Dizon ; Joman Q. Laxamana ; Fernando T. Aninang ; Ma. Carmela Cecilia G. Lapeñ ; a
Philippine Journal of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2021;36(Supplements):1-43
Objective:
The mandible is the most common fractured craniofacial bone of all craniofacial fractures in the Philippines, with the mandibular body as the most involved segment of all mandibular fractures. To the best of our knowledge, there are no existing guidelines for the diagnosis and management of mandibular body fractures in particular. General guidelines include the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAOHNSF) Resident Manual of Trauma to the Face, Head, and Neck chapter on Mandibular Trauma, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery section on the Mandibular Angle, Body, and Ramus, and a 2013 Cochrane Systematic Review on interventions for the management of mandibular fractures. On the other hand, a very specific Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Unilateral Condylar Fracture of the Mandible was published by the Ministry of Health Malaysia in 2005. Addressing the prevalence of mandibular body fractures, and dearth of specific guidelines for its diagnosis and management, this clinical practice guideline focuses on the management of isolated mandibular body fractures in adults.
Purpose:
This guideline is meant for all clinicians (otolaryngologists – head and neck surgeons, as well as primary care and specialist physicians, nurses and nurse practitioners, midwives and community health workers, dentists, and emergency first-responders) who may provide care to adults aged 18 years and above that may present with an acute history and physical and/or laboratory examination findings that may lead to a diagnosis of isolated mandibular body fracture and its subsequent medical and surgical management, including health promotion and disease prevention. It is applicable in any setting (including urban and rural primary-care, community centers, treatment units, hospital emergency rooms, operating rooms) in which adults with isolated mandibular body fractures would be identified, diagnosed, or managed. Outcomes are functional resolution of isolated mandibular body fractures; achieving premorbid form; avoiding use of context-inappropriate diagnostics and therapeutics; minimizing use of ineffective interventions; avoiding co-morbid infections, conditions, complications and adverse events; minimizing cost; maximizing health-related quality of life of individuals with isolated mandibular body fracture; increasing patient satisfaction; and preventing recurrence in patients and occurrence in others.
Action Statements
The guideline development group made strong recommendationsfor the following key action statements: (6) pain management- clinicians should routinely evaluate pain in patients with isolated mandibular body fractures using a numerical rating scale (NRS) or visual analog scale (VAS); analgesics should be routinely offered to patients with a numerical rating pain scale score or VAS of at least 4/10 (paracetamol and a mild opioid with or without an adjuvant analgesic) until the numerical rating pain scale score or VAS is 3/10 at most; (7) antibiotics- prophylactic antibiotics should be given to adult patients with isolated mandibular body fractures with concomitant mucosal or skin opening with or without direct visualization of bone fragments; penicillin is the drug of choice while clindamycin may be used as an alternative; and (14) prevention- clinicians should advocate for compliance with road traffic safety laws (speed limit, anti-drunk driving, seatbelt and helmet use) for the prevention of motor vehicle, cycling and pedestrian accidents and maxillofacial injuries.The guideline development group made recommendations for the following key action statements: (1) history, clinical presentation, and diagnosis - clinicians should consider a presumptive diagnosis of mandibular fracture in adults presenting with a history of traumatic injury to the jaw plus a positive tongue blade test, and any of the following: malocclusion, trismus, tenderness on jaw closure and broken tooth; (2) panoramic x-ray - clinicians may request for panoramic x-ray as the initial imaging tool in evaluating patients with a presumptive clinical diagnosis; (3) radiographs - where panoramic radiography is not available, clinicians may recommend plain mandibular radiography; (4) computed tomography - if available, non-contrast facial CT Scan may be obtained; (5) immobilization - fractures should be temporarily immobilized/splinted with a figure-of-eight bandage until definitive surgical management can be performed or while initiating transport during emergency situations; (8) anesthesia - nasotracheal intubation is the preferred route of anesthesia; in the presence of contraindications, submental intubation or tracheostomy may be performed; (9) observation - with a soft diet may serve as management for favorable isolated nondisplaced and nonmobile mandibular body fractures with unchanged pre - traumatic occlusion; (10) closed reduction - with immobilization by maxillomandibular fixation for 4-6 weeks may be considered for minimally displaced favorable isolated mandibular body fractures with stable dentition, good nutrition and willingness to comply with post-procedure care that may affect oral hygiene, diet modifications, appearance, oral health and functional concerns (eating, swallowing and speech); (11) open reduction with transosseous wiring - with MMF is an option for isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture patients who cannot afford or avail of titanium plates; (12) open reduction with titanium plates - ORIF using titanium plates and screws should be performed in isolated displaced unfavorable and unstable mandibular body fracture; (13) maxillomandibular fixation - intraoperative MMF may not be routinely needed prior to reduction and internal fixation; and (15) promotion - clinicians should play a positive role in the prevention of interpersonal and collective violence as well as the settings in which violence occurs in order to avoid injuries in general and mandibular fractures in particular.
Mandibular Fractures
;
Jaw Fractures
;
Classification
;
History
;
Diagnosis
;
Diagnostic Imaging
;
Therapeutics
;
Diet Therapy
;
Drug Therapy
;
Rehabilitation
;
General Surgery