1.Expression and significance of SR-protein-specific kinase SRPK2 in mouse testis
Hong YANG ; Xiaobin LI ; Ting LI ; Sansan JIA ; Hailong WANG ; Guohua SONG ; Rui GUO
Acta Laboratorium Animalis Scientia Sinica 2015;(2):171-177
Objective To analyze the expression characteristics of SRPK2 ( serine /arginine-rich protein specific kinase 2 mRNA and its encoded protein products in mouse testis, and to reveal its molecular role during spermatogenesis. Methods Using semi-quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction ( RT-PCR) and Western blotting to an-alyze the expression of SRPK2 mRNA and its protein products in several mouse tissues.The stage-specific expression pat-tern of SRPK2 mRNA in mouse testis was examined by real-time quantitative PCR.Immunohistochemical staining was ap-plied to identify the SRPK2 protein distribution in mouse testicular seminiferous tubules and indirect immunofluorescence staining was used to detect the subcellular localization of SRPK2 protein in spermatic cells.Results Semi-quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting analysis revealed that SRPK2 was highly expressed in mice testis.Real-time quantitative PCR analysis showed that SRPK2 mRNA was expressed abundantly at the stage of 5-and 8-week old mouse testes, suggesting that SRPK2 gene has stage-specific expression patterns during mouse spermatogenesis.Immunohistochemical and indirect immu-nofluorescence staining demonstrated that SRPK2 protein was located around the surface of elongated sperm nucleus. Conclusions SRPK2 is highly expressed in mouse testis and has significant stage-specific expression characteristics with distinct nuclear localization.These results indicate that SRPK2 may participate in precursor mRNA splicing during mouse spermiogenesis.The molecular mechanism of SRPK2 is yet to be further studied.
2.Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia with alfentanil and remifentanil undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery
Yan LI ; Sansan JIA ; Bingqing ZHAO ; Yuanmei JI ; Li WANG ; Tao HE ; Xiaolan HE ; Yi ZENG
The Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology 2023;39(11):1137-1141
Objective To compare the effect of postoperative between total intravenous anesthesia(TIVA)use of alfentanil and remifentanil undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery.Methods A total of 130 and thirty patients scheduled for endoscopic sinus surgery,62 males and 68 females,aged 18-64 years,BMI 18-30 kg/m2,ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ,were randomly divided into two groups:alfentanil group(group A)and remifentanil group(group R).Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg,propofol target-controlled infusion(TCI)3 μg/ml,alfentanil 20 μg/kg,and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were injected intravenously in group A,and target-controlled infusion of propofol combined with alfentanil was used to maintain anesthesia.Midazo-lam 0.02 mg/kg,propofol TCI 3 μg/ml,remifentanil 1 μg/kg,and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were injected intravenously in group R,and target-controlled infusion of propofol combined with remifentanil was used to maintain anesthesia.The number of intraoperative hemodynamic adverse reactions such as hypertension,tachycardia,hypotension,bradycardia during operation,and pain degree at 30 minutes,60 minutes,24 hours after operation,extubation time,and rescue analgesia and adverse reactions such as nausea and vomi-ting,skin pruritus,respiratory depression within 24 hours after operation were recorded.Results Compared with group R,the incidence of intraoperative hypotension in group A was significantly lower(P<0.05),the incidence of painless in group A 30 and 60 minutes after operation was significantly higher(P<0.05),the incidence of mild and moderate pain was significantly decreased(P<0.05),and the recovery time was significantly prolonged(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in rescue analgesia within 24 hours after operation.There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting,postoperative skin pruritus,and respiratory depression between the two groups.Conclusion In endoscopic sinus surgery,the effect of total intravenous anesthesia with alfentanil on postoperative analgesia is better than that of remifentanil,and the incidence of perioperative and postoperative adverse reactions in alfentanil is lower than that of remifentanil,while the recovery time of alfentanil is slightly longer than that of remifentanil.