Methods: The study included 200 patients (164 females, 36 males) undergoing primary TKR. Follow-up was performed at 4 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Lumbar spine and knee symptom improvements were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Oxford Knee Score, respectively. Results: All 200 patients undergoing bilateral TKR presented with radiographic lumbar spine degenerative pathology; 60% (n=120) of the patients presented with moderate to severe clinical symptoms of lumbar spondylosis, including 54% (n=108) with degenerative lumbar spondylosis and lumbar canal stenosis and 6% (n=12) with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Of the 120 patients who presented with lumbar spine problems, 90% (n=108) reported improvement in their symptoms; the ODI score improved from 42.5%±4.1% preoperative score to 15.6%±2.3% postoperative score (p -value<0.001). Of the 12 patients with no improvement, 10 patients underwent percutaneous procedures for their lumbar spine pathology with good results, one patient underwent surgery, and one declined any intervention. Conclusions A significant number of patients (60%) undergoing bilateral TKR also present with symptomatic lumbar spine problems. Patients with mild to moderate lumbar spine degenerative symptoms and no associated severe radiating pain on activity are more likely to experience relief of their symptoms post-TKR.

Background: Computer- and robotic-assisted total knee replacement procedures have been shown to improve the accuracy of the implant size. It also allows dynamic confirmation of the implant and limb alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The major inhibition of the arthroplasty surgeon in adapting to the robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) is the extra time spent during the registration process and milling of the bone with the robot. The aim of the study was to ascertain the extra time spent during these 2 steps as compared to the conventional TKA (C-TKA). Methods: It is a prospective study involving 30 patients each in the conventional TKA and RA-TKA operated by the same surgical team. The patients were given a choice between the C-TKA and RA-TKA and consecutive 30 cases in each group were studied by an independent observer. In the C-TKA group, the time for the application of appropriate zigs and execution of the bone cuts and soft-tissue release was recorded whereas in the RA-TKA group, the time taken for fixation of the tibial and femoral arrays and bone registration and bone milling with robot and required soft-tissue release was measured. Results: The preoperative patient characteristics were the same in both groups. The time taken in the C-TKA and RA-TKA groups was 24.77 ± 1.92 minutes and 25.03 ± 3.27 minutes, respectively, which is statistically insignificant (p = 0.709). Conclusions The study findings show that RA-TKA does not take additional time than C-TKA.