OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the change of esophageal acidity when feeding via nasogastric tube is replaced by via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. METHOD: Fourteen patients with brain injury participated in the study. 24-hour pH monitoring was performed during nasogastric tubal feeding. After PEG tube insertion, 24-hour pH monitoring was followed up. There was no difference in medication affecting to esophageal acidity in same patient at both pH monitorings. The results of pH monitorings analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: The total time below pH 4.00 was 135.43+/-190.69 minutes for the patients with nasogastric tube and 25+/-42.74 minutes for PEG tube (p=0.013). The numbers of acid reflux was 42.07+/-47.03 and 21.93+/-22.77 respectively (p=0.074). Of the 14 patients, 9 had acid reflux in nasogastric tubal feeding, which was improved in all 9 patients after PEG. Of the 14 patients, 5 had no acid reflux in nasogastric tubal feeding but 3 of the 5 developed new acid reflux in PEG tubal feeding. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostmy tube feeding was better for acid reflex control. But careful observation is needed after PEG because PEG can develop new acid reflux.
Brain Injuries ; Brain* ; Enteral Nutrition* ; Gastrostomy* ; Humans ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Reflex

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study are to estimate the proper replacement time of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy Foley catheter for prevention of accidental expulsion from the stomach, and to identify factors influencing deflation of balloon. METHOD: Silicone Foley catheters (22 Fr) were placed and compared in the different environments: 1) different acidity (pH 1, 2, 3, 4, 7), 2) static versus dynamic (100 RPM) environment. The balloon capacity of 30 ml versus 5 ml inflated with 5 ml of normal saline were compared. Mean time interval of deflation of balloon down to the capacity of 2.5 ml and 1 ml was estimated and compared respectively. RESULTS: The results showed no significant difference of the decrease of the balloon of the Foley catheters in each acidity except for pH 1 and dynamic environment. But capacity of balloon could affect deflation. The mean days of deflation of total Foley catheter down to 2.5 ml and 1 ml were 23.5+/-5.3 and 42.2+/-7.2 days respectively. CONCLUSION: Physiological gastric acidity and dynamic environment did not affect the deflation of the Foley catheter significantly, but the capacity of the balloon affected it. And suggested proper time of the replacement of the Foley catheter gastrostomy tube is ranged from 24 to 42 days after exchange.
Catheters* ; Gastric Acid ; Gastrostomy* ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Peristalsis ; Silicones ; Stomach