Acute isolated sphenoid sinusitis is a rare disease, and accounts for less than 3% of all sinusitis, especially in young children. Delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis can occur frequently due to atypical clinical presentations. This can lead to serious complications because of the involvement of anatomically related intracranial structures. Therefore, nasal endoscopy, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are important diagnostic tools to confirm the diagnosis. We report two cases of a previously healthy 6-year-old girl and a 13-year-old boy, whose chief complaints were uncontrolled headache and high fever over 38°C. Physical examination and initial laboratory test results of blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid were normal. The diagnosis was made after a brain MRI revealed isolated sphenoid sinusitis. The girl was treated with third generation cephalosporins intravenously. The boy, however, had to undergo an emergent endoscopic sinus surgery as his headache and eyeball-pain symptoms did not resolve by medical treatment alone. Both cases had good outcomes, without neurological sequelae.

The radial artery is generally the preferred access route in coronary angiography and coronary intervention. However, small size, spasm, and anatomical variations concerning the radial artery are major limitations of transradial coronary intervention (TRI). We describe a successful case involving a patient with coronary artery disease who underwent TRI via a well-developed radial recurrent artery branch from the radioulnar alpha loop using a sheathless guiding catheter.

Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis usually progresses as a secondary infection from pulmonary tuberculosis, and tuberculosis of the head and neck region. Tuberculosis of ocular and periocular areas, however, is a rare disease. Among ocular tuberculosis involving the adnexal structures, a few lacrimal sac tuberculosis has been reported. We recently experienced a case of lacrimal sac tuberculosis presenting as epiphora. Examination revealed bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction and the patient underwent endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. During the operation, a biopsy taken from the unhealthy looking lacrimal sac filled with caseous necrotic tissue was suggestive of tuberculosis. Histopathological features and further systemic evaluation confirmed tuberculosis. She was treated medically with anti-tubercular agents. The new opening of the lacrimal sac was patent and epiphora was resolved successfully at a year follow up. This report highlights the requirement of high suspicion of tuberculosis, even in the nasolacrimal drainage system.

The radial artery is generally the preferred access route in coronary angiography and coronary intervention. However, small size, spasm, and anatomical variations concerning the radial artery are major limitations of transradial coronary intervention (TRI). We describe a successful case involving a patient with coronary artery disease who underwent TRI via a well-developed radial recurrent artery branch from the radioulnar alpha loop using a sheathless guiding catheter.
Arteries ; Catheters ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease ; Humans ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ; Radial Artery ; Spasm

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dose characteristics of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) techniques for metastatic brain tumor treatment using various indices to evaluate the quality of the plan and provide insights into the clinical implications of each approach. Methods: Twelve patients with single metastatic brain tumors treated with VMAT were retrospectively analyzed. For comparison with DCA, identical geometric parameters (excluding multileaf collimators) were applied. Dose coverage, normal tissue sparing, and treatment efficiencywere evaluated using indices such as CILIM98 , CIICRU , CIRTOG , QCRTOG , CISALT , HTCISALT , and CIPADDIC .These indices were statistically assessed to evaluate the differences between VMAT and DCA. Results: VMAT was superior to DCA in most indices for both small and large planning targetvolumes (PTVs). DCA plans for large PTVs showed a higher V12Gy , exceeding 10 mL and failing tomeet the recommended criteria (<10 mL). However, DCA required nearly half the monitor units(MUs) of VMAT, resulting in shorter treatment times. All indices, except for QCRTOG , demonstratedsignificant differences between VMAT and DCA. Conclusions Careful consideration is necessary for larger PTVs when deciding a plan becauseDCA can occasionally result in V12Gy of a brain minus PTV >10 mL. Conversely, DCA provides theadvantage of shorter treatment times because of its lower MU. This study highlights the importance of using a combination of indices to comprehensively assess treatment plan quality.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dose characteristics of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) techniques for metastatic brain tumor treatment using various indices to evaluate the quality of the plan and provide insights into the clinical implications of each approach. Methods: Twelve patients with single metastatic brain tumors treated with VMAT were retrospectively analyzed. For comparison with DCA, identical geometric parameters (excluding multileaf collimators) were applied. Dose coverage, normal tissue sparing, and treatment efficiencywere evaluated using indices such as CILIM98 , CIICRU , CIRTOG , QCRTOG , CISALT , HTCISALT , and CIPADDIC .These indices were statistically assessed to evaluate the differences between VMAT and DCA. Results: VMAT was superior to DCA in most indices for both small and large planning targetvolumes (PTVs). DCA plans for large PTVs showed a higher V12Gy , exceeding 10 mL and failing tomeet the recommended criteria (<10 mL). However, DCA required nearly half the monitor units(MUs) of VMAT, resulting in shorter treatment times. All indices, except for QCRTOG , demonstratedsignificant differences between VMAT and DCA. Conclusions Careful consideration is necessary for larger PTVs when deciding a plan becauseDCA can occasionally result in V12Gy of a brain minus PTV >10 mL. Conversely, DCA provides theadvantage of shorter treatment times because of its lower MU. This study highlights the importance of using a combination of indices to comprehensively assess treatment plan quality.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dose characteristics of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) techniques for metastatic brain tumor treatment using various indices to evaluate the quality of the plan and provide insights into the clinical implications of each approach. Methods: Twelve patients with single metastatic brain tumors treated with VMAT were retrospectively analyzed. For comparison with DCA, identical geometric parameters (excluding multileaf collimators) were applied. Dose coverage, normal tissue sparing, and treatment efficiencywere evaluated using indices such as CILIM98 , CIICRU , CIRTOG , QCRTOG , CISALT , HTCISALT , and CIPADDIC .These indices were statistically assessed to evaluate the differences between VMAT and DCA. Results: VMAT was superior to DCA in most indices for both small and large planning targetvolumes (PTVs). DCA plans for large PTVs showed a higher V12Gy , exceeding 10 mL and failing tomeet the recommended criteria (<10 mL). However, DCA required nearly half the monitor units(MUs) of VMAT, resulting in shorter treatment times. All indices, except for QCRTOG , demonstratedsignificant differences between VMAT and DCA. Conclusions Careful consideration is necessary for larger PTVs when deciding a plan becauseDCA can occasionally result in V12Gy of a brain minus PTV >10 mL. Conversely, DCA provides theadvantage of shorter treatment times because of its lower MU. This study highlights the importance of using a combination of indices to comprehensively assess treatment plan quality.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dose characteristics of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) techniques for metastatic brain tumor treatment using various indices to evaluate the quality of the plan and provide insights into the clinical implications of each approach. Methods: Twelve patients with single metastatic brain tumors treated with VMAT were retrospectively analyzed. For comparison with DCA, identical geometric parameters (excluding multileaf collimators) were applied. Dose coverage, normal tissue sparing, and treatment efficiencywere evaluated using indices such as CILIM98 , CIICRU , CIRTOG , QCRTOG , CISALT , HTCISALT , and CIPADDIC .These indices were statistically assessed to evaluate the differences between VMAT and DCA. Results: VMAT was superior to DCA in most indices for both small and large planning targetvolumes (PTVs). DCA plans for large PTVs showed a higher V12Gy , exceeding 10 mL and failing tomeet the recommended criteria (<10 mL). However, DCA required nearly half the monitor units(MUs) of VMAT, resulting in shorter treatment times. All indices, except for QCRTOG , demonstratedsignificant differences between VMAT and DCA. Conclusions Careful consideration is necessary for larger PTVs when deciding a plan becauseDCA can occasionally result in V12Gy of a brain minus PTV >10 mL. Conversely, DCA provides theadvantage of shorter treatment times because of its lower MU. This study highlights the importance of using a combination of indices to comprehensively assess treatment plan quality.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dose characteristics of the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA) techniques for metastatic brain tumor treatment using various indices to evaluate the quality of the plan and provide insights into the clinical implications of each approach. Methods: Twelve patients with single metastatic brain tumors treated with VMAT were retrospectively analyzed. For comparison with DCA, identical geometric parameters (excluding multileaf collimators) were applied. Dose coverage, normal tissue sparing, and treatment efficiencywere evaluated using indices such as CILIM98 , CIICRU , CIRTOG , QCRTOG , CISALT , HTCISALT , and CIPADDIC .These indices were statistically assessed to evaluate the differences between VMAT and DCA. Results: VMAT was superior to DCA in most indices for both small and large planning targetvolumes (PTVs). DCA plans for large PTVs showed a higher V12Gy , exceeding 10 mL and failing tomeet the recommended criteria (<10 mL). However, DCA required nearly half the monitor units(MUs) of VMAT, resulting in shorter treatment times. All indices, except for QCRTOG , demonstratedsignificant differences between VMAT and DCA. Conclusions Careful consideration is necessary for larger PTVs when deciding a plan becauseDCA can occasionally result in V12Gy of a brain minus PTV >10 mL. Conversely, DCA provides theadvantage of shorter treatment times because of its lower MU. This study highlights the importance of using a combination of indices to comprehensively assess treatment plan quality.

The purpose of this study was to measure curvature contour skin dose using radiochromic film and TLD for a conventional open field. We also attempted to quantify the degradation of skin sparing associated with use of immobilization devices for high energy photon beams and to calculate the skin dose with a help of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. To simulate head-and-neck and shoulder treatment, a cylindrical solid water phantom 11 cm in diameter was irradiated with 6 MV x-rays using 40x40 cm2 field at 100 cm source axis distance (SAD) to the center of the phantom. Aquaplastic mesh mask was placed on the surface of the cylindrical phantom that mimicked relevant clinical situations. The skin dose profile was obtained by taking measurements from 0degrees to 360degrees around the circumference of the cylindrical phantom. The skin doses obtained from radiochromic film were found to be 47% of the maximum dose of D(max) at the 0degrees beam entry position and 61% at the 90degrees oblique beam position without the mask. Using the mask (1.5 mm), the skin dose received was 59% at 0degrees incidence and 78% at 80degrees incidence. Skin dose results were also gathered using thin thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). With the mask, the skin dose was 66% at 0degrees incidence and 80% at 80degrees incidence. This method with the mask revealed the similar pattern as film measurement. For the treatments of the head-and-neck and shoulder regions in which immobilization mask was used, skin doses at around tangential angle were nearly the same as the prescription dose. When a sloping skin contour is encountered, skin doses may be abated using thinner and more perforated immoblization devices which should still maintain immoblization.
Axis, Cervical Vertebra ; Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium ; Immobilization ; Incidence ; Masks ; Prescriptions ; Shoulder ; Skin ; Water