Objective: We aimed to share our experience studying the effects and stability of intravenous propafenone in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: This single-center retrospective study evaluated the baseline and clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to the emergency room and treated with propafenone between December 2018 and May 2019;patients were analyzed according to new onset AF and chronic AF groups. Results: Among 24 patients included in the present study, 15 patients were in the new onset AF group while nine were in the chronic AF group. Cardioversion was successful in 15 (73.3%) in the new onset AF group and two (22.2%) in the chronic AF group (P=0.033). The time to cardioversion was relatively short in patients in the new onset AF group (81 minutes vs. 122 minutes, log-rank, P=0.019). Recurrence of AF at 30 days was two (17.2%) in the new onset AF group and 0 (0.0%) in the chronic AF group. No major adverse event was observed except each hypotension in the new onset and chronic AF groups. Conclusion Sinus conversion of propafenone in patients with AF occurring within 48 hours in the emergency room may be considered.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a major complication in sepsis patients. We compared the performance of five DIC diagnostic criteria, focusing on the prediction of mortality. One hundred patients with severe sepsis or septic shock admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) were enrolled. Routine DIC laboratory tests were performed over the first 4 days after admission. The overall ICU and 28-day mortality in DIC patients diagnosed from five criteria (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [ISTH], the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine [JAAM], the revised JAAM [R-JAAM], the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare [JMHW] and the Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis [KSTH]) were compared. Both KSTH and JMHW criteria showed superior performance than ISTH, JAAM and R-JAAM criteria in the prediction of overall ICU mortality in DIC patients (odds ratio 3.828 and 5.181, P = 0.018 and 0.006, 95% confidence interval 1.256–11.667 and 1.622–16.554, respectively) when applied at day 1 after admission, and survival analysis demonstrated significant prognostic impact of KSTH and JMHW criteria on the prediction of 28-day mortality (P = 0.007 and 0.049, respectively) when applied at day 1 after admission. In conclusion, both KSTH and JMHW criteria would be more useful than other three criteria in predicting prognosis in DIC patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Dacarbazine ; Diagnosis ; Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation* ; Hemostasis ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Mortality* ; Prognosis ; Sepsis* ; Shock, Septic ; Thrombosis

PURPOSE: Recently, several studies for immature granulocyte proportion (IG%) in patients with sepsis have revealed its association with diagnosis and prognosis of patients with sepsis. In this study, we enrolled patients with severe sepsis and septic shock and compared IG% with other biologic markers as a predictor of 28-day mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective study for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock who were admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital for four-months. The IG% measured using Sysmex XE-2100 and other inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein, lactate, and procalcitonin were evaluated and compared for 28-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with septic shock and 45 patients with severe sepsis were enrolled. In the non-survivors group (n=32, 24.6%), APACHE II score (p=0.017), use of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (p=0.002), and septic shock (p=0.009) were statistically higher compared with thesurvivors group. APACHE II score (Odd ratio [OR] 1.099, p=0.008) and IG% (> or =0.5%) (OR 3.568, p=0.036) predicted the 28-day mortality independently after adjusting SOFA score, septic shock,disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, use of CRRT, and gender. However, IG (> or =0.5%) had low specificity of 33.7% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 30.1% for 28-day mortality. CONCLUSION: IG% could be a useful biologic marker for prediction of 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. However, the limitation of low specificity and PPV must be considered in clinical use.
APACHE ; Biomarkers ; C-Reactive Protein ; Diagnosis ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Granulocytes* ; Humans ; Lactic Acid ; Mortality* ; Prognosis ; Renal Replacement Therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sepsis* ; Shock, Septic* ; Tertiary Healthcare

PURPOSE: The death rate of liver cancer in Korea has been reported as one of the highest in the world. This study was conducted to investigate geographical variations of liver cancer mortality in Korea in order to obtain insight into possible environmental factors related to liver cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sex-specific standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) of liver cancer were calculated for 168 basic administrative units in Korea based upon the vital statistics for the seven years 1992 to 1998, as well as the sex- and age-specific population of each area for 1995. The SMRs were classified into six categories and depicted on a map for each sex. RESULTS: The southern provinces showed clearly higher mortality rates as compared to the rest of the country in both males and females. Looking at the maps in detail, there was a geographical variation even within the southern provinces. The areas around large rivers, some costal areas, and costal islands showed a high mortality rate. Even in the middle and northern provinces, the eastern costal areas showed relatively higher mortality rates as compared to inland areas. Conversely, some southern areas known for low levels of pollution showed relatively lower mortality rates. CONCLUSION: This finding suggests a possible relationship between liver cancer and water-related foods from polluted rivers or seas. Further studies should be performed in order to clarify which factors cause this geographical variation.
Female ; Humans ; Islands ; Korea* ; Liver Neoplasms* ; Liver* ; Male ; Mortality* ; Oceans and Seas ; Rivers ; Vital Statistics

PURPOSE: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a common occurrence, and requires performance of appropriate triage to determine the priority for patient treatments. Undertriage, defined as inappropriate assignment of a low level of severity during triage, delays the initiation of treatment and may lead to deterioration of severely ill or injured patients. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of undertriage patients and their risk exposure to a worsening prognosis. METHODS: Subjects were ED patients admitted to a university affiliated hospital from Jan 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2010, and they were triaged according to the modified Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale. Patients who were initially categorized as non-emergency cases (scale 4 or 5) but later recategorized as emergency cases (scale 1 or 2) were defined as the undertriage group. Triage patients who did not receive a change of severity categorization were assigned to a low-acuity group for non-emergency cases, and a high-acuity group for emergency cases. The clinical characteristics and worsening prognosis of the undertriage group were compared with low- and high-acuity groups. Worsening prognosis included cardiac arrest and the admission to the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Patients in the undertriage group were 0.9% of the total study participants. The undertriage group predominantly included elderly males with head and neck injuries, or hemato-oncology diseases. Worsening prognosis was less likely in the undertriage group than in the high-acuity group, and more likely than in the low-acuity group. CONCLUSION: Undertriage was not common. However, worsening prognosis was very high in the undertriage group as compared to the low-acuity group. Prudential concern is required to avoid undertriage with the elderly, and patients with head and neck injuries, or hemato-oncology diseases.
Aged ; Emergencies ; Head ; Heart Arrest ; Humans ; Critical Care ; Male ; Neck Injuries ; Prognosis ; Triage

In this paper, a new superimposition scheme using a computer vision system was proposed with pairs of skull and ante-mortem photographs, which were already identified through other tests and DNA fingerprints at the Korea National Institute of Scientific Investigation. In this computer vision system, an unidentified skull was caught by video-camcoder with the MPEG and the other ante-mortem photograph was scanned by scanner. These two images were processed and superimposed using pixel processing. This recognition of individual identifications by anatomical references can be performed on the two superimposed images for many big cases like as Guam KAL accident in 1997.
Artificial Intelligence ; DNA Fingerprinting ; Guam ; Korea ; Skull

The typical presentation of intussusception includes intermittent severe abdominal pain, vomiting, rectal bleeding, and the presence of an abdominal mass. We present a case of intussusception after abdominal blunt trauma along with a literature review. A 4-year-old girl was admitted to the emergency department after a bicycle accident. She complained of progressively worsening abdominal pain, but there was no vomiting, fever, bloody stool, or abdominal mass. She was finally diagnosed with traumatic intussusception by ultrasonography and treated with air reduction. Because the typical symptoms are unusual in traumatic intussusception, close attention must be paid to avoid a delayed diagnosis.
Abdominal Pain ; Child, Preschool ; Delayed Diagnosis ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Fever ; Hemorrhage ; Humans ; Intussusception* ; Pediatrics ; Ultrasonography ; Vomiting ; Wounds and Injuries

Objective: This study examined the up-to-date facts from real cases of emergency medical litigations to provide information to act appropriately in medical lawsuits against emergency medicine specialists. Methods: Data were collected from lawsuits from 2008 to 2020. Thirty-nine cases were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Six emergency medicine specialists and one resident with a lawyer’s license participated in the analysis. Results: Medical litigations have surged since 2015. The lawsuits were due mainly to misdiagnoses and violations of the duty to explain. Medical staff won in 12 (38.7%) cases and lost in 19 (61.3%). The main reason for losing was a violation of the duty of care. In criminal claims, 50% of cases resulted in confinement. The win rate was 1.4 times higher in cases where consultation was requested from other specialties (42.9% and 29.4% win with consultation and without, respectively). Conclusion The win rate in lawsuits is decreasing, and the level of penalty is becoming more severe. The decrease in the violation of duty to explain was attributed to education through the years. The win rate was higher when consulting with other specialists. Hence, active consultation is recommended. In addition, the system of radiology interpretation requires improvement because of the many misdiagnoses from reading diagnostic images.

Objective: This study examined the up-to-date facts from real cases of emergency medical litigations to provide information to act appropriately in medical lawsuits against emergency medicine specialists. Methods: Data were collected from lawsuits from 2008 to 2020. Thirty-nine cases were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Six emergency medicine specialists and one resident with a lawyer’s license participated in the analysis. Results: Medical litigations have surged since 2015. The lawsuits were due mainly to misdiagnoses and violations of the duty to explain. Medical staff won in 12 (38.7%) cases and lost in 19 (61.3%). The main reason for losing was a violation of the duty of care. In criminal claims, 50% of cases resulted in confinement. The win rate was 1.4 times higher in cases where consultation was requested from other specialties (42.9% and 29.4% win with consultation and without, respectively). Conclusion The win rate in lawsuits is decreasing, and the level of penalty is becoming more severe. The decrease in the violation of duty to explain was attributed to education through the years. The win rate was higher when consulting with other specialists. Hence, active consultation is recommended. In addition, the system of radiology interpretation requires improvement because of the many misdiagnoses from reading diagnostic images.

Objective: This study examined the up-to-date facts from real cases of emergency medical litigations to provide information to act appropriately in medical lawsuits against emergency medicine specialists. Methods: Data were collected from lawsuits from 2008 to 2020. Thirty-nine cases were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Six emergency medicine specialists and one resident with a lawyer’s license participated in the analysis. Results: Medical litigations have surged since 2015. The lawsuits were due mainly to misdiagnoses and violations of the duty to explain. Medical staff won in 12 (38.7%) cases and lost in 19 (61.3%). The main reason for losing was a violation of the duty of care. In criminal claims, 50% of cases resulted in confinement. The win rate was 1.4 times higher in cases where consultation was requested from other specialties (42.9% and 29.4% win with consultation and without, respectively). Conclusion The win rate in lawsuits is decreasing, and the level of penalty is becoming more severe. The decrease in the violation of duty to explain was attributed to education through the years. The win rate was higher when consulting with other specialists. Hence, active consultation is recommended. In addition, the system of radiology interpretation requires improvement because of the many misdiagnoses from reading diagnostic images.