Korea’s medical accident compensation system is a vital national initiative designed to create a stable environment for both mothers and healthcare professionals. This article examines how Korea's neighboring countries, Taiwan and Japan, operate their obstetric compensation systems to draw lessons and implications for Korea's approach.Current Concepts: Korea's medical malpractice compensation system is fully funded by the government, and the amount is determined by the Compensation Review Committee, which considers the type of accident and, in cases of cerebral palsy, the degree of impairment, with awards reaching up to 30 million won. Japan experienced severe declines in birth rates, a shortage of obstetricians, and the closure of maternity hospitals due to increasing medical litigation. In response, the government ,in 2009, introduced a no-fault obstetric compensation system that covers cerebral palsy cases regardless of negligence. Taiwan faced a surge in medical disputes, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology, with maternal lawsuits comprising 14% of all cases. In 2016, the government introduced the Childbirth Accident Emergency Relief Act, achieving a 93.9% compensation approval rate Discussion and Conclusion: Observing these challenges, young doctors are increasingly dissuaded from pursuing careers in obstetrics and gynecology doctor, thereby accelerating the decline of maternity care services. To maintain a stable medical environment, compensation amounts should be adjusted to reflect actual medical costs, and reimbursement rates for obstetric procedures should be re-evaluated. Drawing on the successful implementations in Japan and Taiwan, South Korea must establish a sustainable and protective obstetric care system at the national level.

Korea’s medical accident compensation system is a vital national initiative designed to create a stable environment for both mothers and healthcare professionals. This article examines how Korea's neighboring countries, Taiwan and Japan, operate their obstetric compensation systems to draw lessons and implications for Korea's approach.Current Concepts: Korea's medical malpractice compensation system is fully funded by the government, and the amount is determined by the Compensation Review Committee, which considers the type of accident and, in cases of cerebral palsy, the degree of impairment, with awards reaching up to 30 million won. Japan experienced severe declines in birth rates, a shortage of obstetricians, and the closure of maternity hospitals due to increasing medical litigation. In response, the government ,in 2009, introduced a no-fault obstetric compensation system that covers cerebral palsy cases regardless of negligence. Taiwan faced a surge in medical disputes, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology, with maternal lawsuits comprising 14% of all cases. In 2016, the government introduced the Childbirth Accident Emergency Relief Act, achieving a 93.9% compensation approval rate Discussion and Conclusion: Observing these challenges, young doctors are increasingly dissuaded from pursuing careers in obstetrics and gynecology doctor, thereby accelerating the decline of maternity care services. To maintain a stable medical environment, compensation amounts should be adjusted to reflect actual medical costs, and reimbursement rates for obstetric procedures should be re-evaluated. Drawing on the successful implementations in Japan and Taiwan, South Korea must establish a sustainable and protective obstetric care system at the national level.

Korea’s medical accident compensation system is a vital national initiative designed to create a stable environment for both mothers and healthcare professionals. This article examines how Korea's neighboring countries, Taiwan and Japan, operate their obstetric compensation systems to draw lessons and implications for Korea's approach.Current Concepts: Korea's medical malpractice compensation system is fully funded by the government, and the amount is determined by the Compensation Review Committee, which considers the type of accident and, in cases of cerebral palsy, the degree of impairment, with awards reaching up to 30 million won. Japan experienced severe declines in birth rates, a shortage of obstetricians, and the closure of maternity hospitals due to increasing medical litigation. In response, the government ,in 2009, introduced a no-fault obstetric compensation system that covers cerebral palsy cases regardless of negligence. Taiwan faced a surge in medical disputes, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology, with maternal lawsuits comprising 14% of all cases. In 2016, the government introduced the Childbirth Accident Emergency Relief Act, achieving a 93.9% compensation approval rate Discussion and Conclusion: Observing these challenges, young doctors are increasingly dissuaded from pursuing careers in obstetrics and gynecology doctor, thereby accelerating the decline of maternity care services. To maintain a stable medical environment, compensation amounts should be adjusted to reflect actual medical costs, and reimbursement rates for obstetric procedures should be re-evaluated. Drawing on the successful implementations in Japan and Taiwan, South Korea must establish a sustainable and protective obstetric care system at the national level.

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is frequently associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and insulin resistance, contributes to the development of vascular complications. Statin therapy is the primary approach to dyslipidemia management in T2D, however, the role of non-statin therapy remains unclear. Ezetimibe reduces cholesterol burden by inhibiting intestinal cholesterol absorption. Fibrates lower triglyceride levels and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor alpha agonism. Therefore, when combined, these drugs effectively lower non-HDL-C levels. Despite this, few clinical trials have specifically targeted non-HDL-C, and the efficacy of triple combination therapies, including statins, ezetimibe, and fibrates, has yet to be determined. Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, active-comparator controlled trial involving 3,958 eligible participants with T2D, cardiovascular risk factors, and elevated non-HDL-C (≥100 mg/dL). Participants, already on moderate-intensity statins, will be randomly assigned to either Ezefeno (ezetimibe/fenofibrate) addition or statin dose-escalation. The primary end point is the development of a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and diabetic microvascular events over 48 months. Conclusion This trial aims to assess whether combining statins, ezetimibe, and fenofibrate is as effective as, or possibly superior to, statin monotherapy intensification in lowering cardiovascular and microvascular disease risk for patients with T2D. This could propose a novel therapeutic approach for managing dyslipidemia in T2D.