1.Latarjet operation carries three times the risk of failure in seizure versus non-seizure recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder joint: outcome of a systematic review with meta-analysis
Alok RAI ; Dushyant CHOUHAN ; Sandeep Kumar NEMA ; Arkesh MADEGOWDA ; Rudra NARAYAN ; Bikram K. KAR
Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow 2024;27(2):160-168
Recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation (RASD) in cases of seizure disorders (SDs) total 50%–80% of all SD-associated shoulder instabilities. Based on the extent of bone loss, treatment options include bony and soft-tissue reconstructions, arthroplasty, and arthrodesis. The primary objective of this paper was to review the treatment options for RASD in SDs. Methods: Several bibliographic databases were searched for RASD treatment options in SD patients. The demographic outcome measures, the failure rate (defined as the relative risk of recurrence of dislocation postoperation), and the postoperative seizure recurrence rate were recorded. Results: We pooled 171 cases (187 shoulders) from 11 studies. Of these, one, five, two, two, and one reports studied Bankart’s operation with remplissage (27 cases/29 shoulders), the Latarjet procedure (106/118), bone block operation (21/23), arthroplasty (11/11), and arthrodesis (6/6), respectively, in treating SD-associated RASD. The relative risk of failure between SD and non-SD patients was 3.76 (1.3610.38) after the Latarjet operation. The failure rates were 17% and 13% for Bankart’s operation with remplissage and the Latarjet procedure in SD patients, respectively, but 0% each for bone block operation, arthroplasty, and arthrodesis. The total rate of seizure recurrence after operation was 33% of the pooled cases. Conclusions: SD recurrence in the postoperative period, the size of the bone block, and the muscular attachments to a small coracoid autograft are the determinants of failure among various reconstructive operations in SD-associated RASD. Level of evidence: III.
2.Clinical and laboratory profile in confirmed vs. suspected septic arthritis patients and its relevance in decision making: A comparative cross-sectional study.
Sandeep K NEMA ; Suman Kumar BASEL ; Jose AUSTINE ; Kiyana MIRZA
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2021;24(2):94-99
PURPOSE:
There were 10%-30% of patients with adult-onset septic arthritis (SA) exhibiting sterile synovial fluid (SF), and the uncertainty in the determining diagnosis of these patients posed a challenge in management. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between confirmed (Newman A) and suspected (Newman B & C) SA in adults.
METHODS:
This was a descriptive study with a cross-sectional study design conducted at a tertiary referral centre from July 2016 to February 2019. Patients aged over 18 years presented to the emergency department with clinical features suggestive of SA and were scheduled to undergo arthrotomy and joint lavage by the treating surgeon were included in the study. Patients with prosthetic joint infections and open joint injuries were excluded. Patients' demographic data, clinical features and laboratory parameters were collected. The clinical and laboratory profile (blood and SF) of the adult patients presenting with features suggestive of SA based on Newman criteria was statistically analyzed by SPSS version 20 software and Microsoft Excel. The categorical variables were expressed as proportions while the continuous variables were expressed as mean (SD) or median (IQR) depending upon the normality of distribution. The difference between the two groups for categorical variables was assessed using the Chi-square test and the difference for continuous variables was assessed using the unpaired t-test and the Mann-Whitney test depending upon normality. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS:
Thirty-six patients were divided into confirmed (n = 19) or suspected (n = 17) SA for assessment based on SF culture. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 50 years (37-60 years). There was no significant difference in demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters between the concerned groups. Eight patients presented with fever. Among the confirmed SA cases, 8 were negative for C-reactive protein and 6 had synovial white blood cell count <50,000. Staphylococcus species were isolated in 8 cases. The most common risk factors for SA were chronic kidney disease (25.0%), diabetes mellitus (25.0%), pharmacologic immunosuppression (16.7%), recent joint surgery (11.1%) and distant site infection (11.1%).
CONCLUSION
SA is an orthopaedic emergency that needs prompt and aggressive treatment to prevent catastrophic complications. Confirmed and suspected cases of SA exhibit similar demography, clinical features and laboratory parameters at presentation which may mislead the treating surgeon. Management should be based on sound clinical judgment in the event of failure to culture microorganisms.
3.Does age, time since injury and meniscal injury affect short term functional outcomes in arthroscopic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?
Udit Kumar BISWAL ; Gopisankar BALAJI ; Sandeep NEMA ; Jagdish MENON ; Dilip Kumar PATRO
Chinese Journal of Traumatology 2018;21(1):50-53
PURPOSEWe conducted this study to correlate the short term clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with patients' age, time since injury and associated meniscal injury.
METHODSA total of 43 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between October 2013 and February 2015 were taken for the study. Preoperative demographic data, clinical scores (Lysholm, IKDC) were recorded for each patient. Time since injury and associated meniscal injuries were recorded. Then a standardized surgical technique was used for each graft type. They were followed up for 6 months and the Lysholm and IKDC scores were evaluated.
RESULTSOnly 33 patients completed 6 months follow-up at the end of this study. Twenty-four patients (72.7%) were in the age group of 18-30 years. Nine patients belonged to age group 30-50 years (27.3%). The p value for differences in Lysholm scores between the two age groups was not significant (0.339). The p value for differences in IKDC scores between the two age groups was not significant either (0.138). The mean Lysholm scores were 93.86 ± 3.024 for the group who presented <6 months post-injury, 92 ± 5.494 for the group who presented between 6 months and 1 year and 94.64 ± 3.104 for the group who presented after 1 year; whereas the mean IKDC scores were 92.43 ± 0.793, 90.64 ± 6.598 and 90.89 ± 2.113 respectively. The correlation of outcomes with meniscal injury had no statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONBased on our study, we conclude that age, time since injury and associated meniscal injury does not affect short term functional outcome in ACL reconstruction.