1.Workers intake too much salt from dishes of eating out and food service cafeterias; direct chemical analysis of sodium content.
Hae Ryun PARK ; Gye Ok JEONG ; Seung Lim LEE ; Jin Young KIM ; Soon Ah KANG ; Kun Young PARK ; Hyun Joo RYOU
Nutrition Research and Practice 2009;3(4):328-333
The average sodium intake of Koreans was reported to be 5,279.9 mg/day, which is one of the highest intake levels worldwide. The average Koreans intake 19.6% of sodium from kimchi, showing kimchi as the main contributor of sodium in this country (Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2005). The sodium content of dishes that are frequently chosen by workers, and which were served by foodservice cafeterias were chemically analyzed. The average sodium content of one meal provided by 10 foodservice cafeterias was 2,777.7 mg. Twenty-one, one-dish-meals, frequently chosen by workers for a lunch menu, were collected at 4 different restaurants for each menu by one male, aged in the twenties and analyzed chemically also. Workers who eat lunch at a workplace cafeteria everyday could intake about 8 g of salt at a one-time meal and those who eat out for a one-dish-meal would intake 3-8 g of salt without counting sodium content from the side dishes. From these study results, one could estimate that over 10 g of salt could be possible for a single meal for workers who eat out everyday. A nationwide nutrition campaign and education for low salt diets for restaurant owners and foodservice providers should be seriously considered.
Aged
;
Diet
;
Eating
;
Food Services
;
Humans
;
Lunch
;
Male
;
Meals
;
Restaurants
;
Sodium
2.Target-Enhanced Whole-Genome Sequencing Shows Clinical Validity Equivalent to Commercially Available Targeted Oncology Panel
Sangmoon LEE ; Jin ROH ; Jun Sung PARK ; Islam Oguz TUNCAY ; Wonchul LEE ; Jung-Ah KIM ; Brian Baek-Lok OH ; Jong-Yeon SHIN ; Jeong Seok LEE ; Young Seok JU ; Ryul KIM ; Seongyeol PARK ; Jaemo KOO ; Hansol PARK ; Joonoh LIM ; Erin CONNOLLY-STRONG ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Yong Won CHOI ; Mi Sun AHN ; Hyun Woo LEE ; Seokhwi KIM ; Jang-Hee KIM ; Minsuk KWON
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(2):350-361
Purpose:
Cancer poses a significant global health challenge, demanding precise genomic testing for individualized treatment strategies. Targeted-panel sequencing (TPS) has improved personalized oncology but often lacks comprehensive coverage of crucial cancer alterations. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) addresses this gap, offering extensive genomic testing. This study demonstrates the medical potential of WGS.
Materials and Methods:
This study evaluates target-enhanced WGS (TE-WGS), a clinical-grade WGS method sequencing both cancer and matched normal tissues. Forty-nine patients with various solid cancer types underwent both TE-WGS and TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500), one of the mainstream TPS approaches.
Results:
TE-WGS detected all variants reported by TSO500 (100%, 498/498). A high correlation in variant allele fractions was observed between TE-WGS and TSO500 (r=0.978). Notably, 223 variants (44.8%) within the common set were discerned exclusively by TE-WGS in peripheral blood, suggesting their germline origin. Conversely, the remaining subset of 275 variants (55.2%) were not detected in peripheral blood using the TE-WGS, signifying them as bona fide somatic variants. Further, TE-WGS provided accurate copy number profiles, fusion genes, microsatellite instability, and homologous recombination deficiency scores, which were essential for clinical decision-making.
Conclusion
TE-WGS is a comprehensive approach in personalized oncology, matching TSO500’s key biomarker detection capabilities. It uniquely identifies germline variants and genomic instability markers, offering additional clinical actions. Its adaptability and cost-effectiveness underscore its clinical utility, making TE-WGS a valuable tool in personalized cancer treatment.
3.Target-Enhanced Whole-Genome Sequencing Shows Clinical Validity Equivalent to Commercially Available Targeted Oncology Panel
Sangmoon LEE ; Jin ROH ; Jun Sung PARK ; Islam Oguz TUNCAY ; Wonchul LEE ; Jung-Ah KIM ; Brian Baek-Lok OH ; Jong-Yeon SHIN ; Jeong Seok LEE ; Young Seok JU ; Ryul KIM ; Seongyeol PARK ; Jaemo KOO ; Hansol PARK ; Joonoh LIM ; Erin CONNOLLY-STRONG ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Yong Won CHOI ; Mi Sun AHN ; Hyun Woo LEE ; Seokhwi KIM ; Jang-Hee KIM ; Minsuk KWON
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(2):350-361
Purpose:
Cancer poses a significant global health challenge, demanding precise genomic testing for individualized treatment strategies. Targeted-panel sequencing (TPS) has improved personalized oncology but often lacks comprehensive coverage of crucial cancer alterations. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) addresses this gap, offering extensive genomic testing. This study demonstrates the medical potential of WGS.
Materials and Methods:
This study evaluates target-enhanced WGS (TE-WGS), a clinical-grade WGS method sequencing both cancer and matched normal tissues. Forty-nine patients with various solid cancer types underwent both TE-WGS and TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500), one of the mainstream TPS approaches.
Results:
TE-WGS detected all variants reported by TSO500 (100%, 498/498). A high correlation in variant allele fractions was observed between TE-WGS and TSO500 (r=0.978). Notably, 223 variants (44.8%) within the common set were discerned exclusively by TE-WGS in peripheral blood, suggesting their germline origin. Conversely, the remaining subset of 275 variants (55.2%) were not detected in peripheral blood using the TE-WGS, signifying them as bona fide somatic variants. Further, TE-WGS provided accurate copy number profiles, fusion genes, microsatellite instability, and homologous recombination deficiency scores, which were essential for clinical decision-making.
Conclusion
TE-WGS is a comprehensive approach in personalized oncology, matching TSO500’s key biomarker detection capabilities. It uniquely identifies germline variants and genomic instability markers, offering additional clinical actions. Its adaptability and cost-effectiveness underscore its clinical utility, making TE-WGS a valuable tool in personalized cancer treatment.
4.Target-Enhanced Whole-Genome Sequencing Shows Clinical Validity Equivalent to Commercially Available Targeted Oncology Panel
Sangmoon LEE ; Jin ROH ; Jun Sung PARK ; Islam Oguz TUNCAY ; Wonchul LEE ; Jung-Ah KIM ; Brian Baek-Lok OH ; Jong-Yeon SHIN ; Jeong Seok LEE ; Young Seok JU ; Ryul KIM ; Seongyeol PARK ; Jaemo KOO ; Hansol PARK ; Joonoh LIM ; Erin CONNOLLY-STRONG ; Tae-Hwan KIM ; Yong Won CHOI ; Mi Sun AHN ; Hyun Woo LEE ; Seokhwi KIM ; Jang-Hee KIM ; Minsuk KWON
Cancer Research and Treatment 2025;57(2):350-361
Purpose:
Cancer poses a significant global health challenge, demanding precise genomic testing for individualized treatment strategies. Targeted-panel sequencing (TPS) has improved personalized oncology but often lacks comprehensive coverage of crucial cancer alterations. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) addresses this gap, offering extensive genomic testing. This study demonstrates the medical potential of WGS.
Materials and Methods:
This study evaluates target-enhanced WGS (TE-WGS), a clinical-grade WGS method sequencing both cancer and matched normal tissues. Forty-nine patients with various solid cancer types underwent both TE-WGS and TruSight Oncology 500 (TSO500), one of the mainstream TPS approaches.
Results:
TE-WGS detected all variants reported by TSO500 (100%, 498/498). A high correlation in variant allele fractions was observed between TE-WGS and TSO500 (r=0.978). Notably, 223 variants (44.8%) within the common set were discerned exclusively by TE-WGS in peripheral blood, suggesting their germline origin. Conversely, the remaining subset of 275 variants (55.2%) were not detected in peripheral blood using the TE-WGS, signifying them as bona fide somatic variants. Further, TE-WGS provided accurate copy number profiles, fusion genes, microsatellite instability, and homologous recombination deficiency scores, which were essential for clinical decision-making.
Conclusion
TE-WGS is a comprehensive approach in personalized oncology, matching TSO500’s key biomarker detection capabilities. It uniquely identifies germline variants and genomic instability markers, offering additional clinical actions. Its adaptability and cost-effectiveness underscore its clinical utility, making TE-WGS a valuable tool in personalized cancer treatment.
5.Organizing an in-class hackathon to correct PDF-to-text conversion errors of Genomics & Informatics 1.0
Sunho KIM ; Royoung KIM ; Ryeo-Gyeong KIM ; Enjin KO ; Han-Su KIM ; Jihye SHIN ; Daeun CHO ; Yurhee JIN ; Soyeon BAE ; Ye Won JO ; San Ah JEONG ; Yena KIM ; Seoyeon AHN ; Bomi JANG ; Jiheyon SEONG ; Yujin LEE ; Si Eun SEO ; Yujin KIM ; Ha-Jeong KIM ; Hyeji KIM ; Hye-Lynn SUNG ; Hyoyoung LHO ; Jaywon KOO ; Jion CHU ; Juwon LIM ; Youngju KIM ; Kyungyeon LEE ; Yuri LIM ; Meongeun KIM ; Seonjeong HWANG ; Shinhye HAN ; Sohyeun BAE ; Sua KIM ; Suhyeon YOO ; Yeonjeong SEO ; Yerim SHIN ; Yonsoo KIM ; You-Jung KO ; Jihee BAEK ; Hyejin HYUN ; Hyemin CHOI ; Ji-Hye OH ; Da-Young KIM ; Hee-Jo NAM ; Hyun-Seok PARK
Genomics & Informatics 2020;18(3):e33-
This paper describes a community effort to improve earlier versions of the full-text corpus of Genomics & Informatics by semi-automatically detecting and correcting PDF-to-text conversion errors and optical character recognition errors during the first hackathon of Genomics & Informatics Annotation Hackathon (GIAH) event. Extracting text from multi-column biomedical documents such as Genomics & Informatics is known to be notoriously difficult. The hackathon was piloted as part of a coding competition of the ELTEC College of Engineering at Ewha Womans University in order to enable researchers and students to create or annotate their own versions of the Genomics & Informatics corpus, to gain and create knowledge about corpus linguistics, and simultaneously to acquire tangible and transferable skills. The proposed projects during the hackathon harness an internal database containing different versions of the corpus and annotations.
6.Organizing an in-class hackathon to correct PDF-to-text conversion errors of Genomics & Informatics 1.0
Sunho KIM ; Royoung KIM ; Ryeo-Gyeong KIM ; Enjin KO ; Han-Su KIM ; Jihye SHIN ; Daeun CHO ; Yurhee JIN ; Soyeon BAE ; Ye Won JO ; San Ah JEONG ; Yena KIM ; Seoyeon AHN ; Bomi JANG ; Jiheyon SEONG ; Yujin LEE ; Si Eun SEO ; Yujin KIM ; Ha-Jeong KIM ; Hyeji KIM ; Hye-Lynn SUNG ; Hyoyoung LHO ; Jaywon KOO ; Jion CHU ; Juwon LIM ; Youngju KIM ; Kyungyeon LEE ; Yuri LIM ; Meongeun KIM ; Seonjeong HWANG ; Shinhye HAN ; Sohyeun BAE ; Sua KIM ; Suhyeon YOO ; Yeonjeong SEO ; Yerim SHIN ; Yonsoo KIM ; You-Jung KO ; Jihee BAEK ; Hyejin HYUN ; Hyemin CHOI ; Ji-Hye OH ; Da-Young KIM ; Hee-Jo NAM ; Hyun-Seok PARK
Genomics & Informatics 2020;18(3):e33-
This paper describes a community effort to improve earlier versions of the full-text corpus of Genomics & Informatics by semi-automatically detecting and correcting PDF-to-text conversion errors and optical character recognition errors during the first hackathon of Genomics & Informatics Annotation Hackathon (GIAH) event. Extracting text from multi-column biomedical documents such as Genomics & Informatics is known to be notoriously difficult. The hackathon was piloted as part of a coding competition of the ELTEC College of Engineering at Ewha Womans University in order to enable researchers and students to create or annotate their own versions of the Genomics & Informatics corpus, to gain and create knowledge about corpus linguistics, and simultaneously to acquire tangible and transferable skills. The proposed projects during the hackathon harness an internal database containing different versions of the corpus and annotations.