Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) is the most important pathogen of nongonococcal urethritis. C. trachomatis was detected by cell culture, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 145 patients with nongonococcal urethritis. In 5 of 63 antibiotic-treated patients, C. trachomatis was identified by at least one method. C. trachomutid was identified in 34 (41.5%) of 82 nontreated patients. The most common symptom of the 34 patients was painful urination. C. trachomafir was identified in 6 cases (17.6%) of 34 patients by cell culture. And C. trachorrdtis was identified in 9 cases (26.5%) by ELISA, while in 33 cases(97.1%) by PCR. When PCR was performed with urines and urinary swabs collected from 38 patients with nongonococcal urethritis, 11(29%) cases showed positive with urine and 10(26%) cases with urinary swab. These results suggested that PCR with urine showed the higher positive detection rate of C. trachomatis in the patient with nongonococcal urethritis than other methods.
Cell Culture Techniques ; Chlamydia trachomatis* ; Chlamydia* ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Humans ; Polymerase Chain Reaction* ; Urethritis* ; Urination

In genitourinary trauma, the bladder is the second most common injury site. The majority of patients are injured by traffic accident. Injuries associated with bladder trauma are usually pelvic and rib fracture, but diaphragmatic rupture is rare. If bladder injury is suspected, diagnosis is made by a retrograde cystogram in most cases. However, if the patient complains of dyspnea, erect chest PA view or chest CT scan should be evaluated. We experienced a case of intraperitoneal bladder rupture combined with diaphragmatic rupture without other internal organ injury in a 68-year-old woman.
Accidents, Traffic ; Aged ; Diagnosis ; Diaphragm ; Dyspnea ; Female ; Humans ; Rib Fractures ; Rupture* ; Thorax ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Urinary Bladder*

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery was previously accepted as an alternative surgical option in treatment for colorectal cancer. Nowadays, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is introduced as a method to maximize advantages of minimally invasive surgery. However, SPLS has several limitations compared to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (CMLS). To overcome those limitations of SPLS, reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) was introduced. This study aimed at evaluating the short-term outcomes of RPLS. METHODS: Patients who underwent CMLS and RPLS of colon cancer between August 2011 and December 2013 were included in this study. Short-term clinical and pathological outcome were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent RPLS and 217 patients underwent CMLS. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and faster bowel movement were shown in RPLS group in this study. In terms of postoperative pain, numeric rating scale (NRS) of RPLS was lower than that of CMLS. Significant differences were shown in terms of tumor size, harvested lymph node, perineural invasion, and pathological stage. No significant differences were confirmed in terms of other surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this study, RPLS was technically feasible and safe. Especially in terms of postoperative pain, RPLS was comparable to CMLS. RPLS may be a feasible alternative option in selected patients with colon cancer.
Colon* ; Colonic Neoplasms* ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Humans ; Laparoscopy* ; Lymph Nodes ; Methods ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Pain, Postoperative