Objectives: To compare the clinical outcomes of rapid versus slow enteral feeding advancement in preterm low birth weight neonates.

Methods: Searches for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of rapid versus slow rate of enteral feeding advancement on the clinical outcomes of preterm, low birth weight neonates were performed in different databases. Two authors screened the articles for inclusion and statistical analysis was done using Review Manager Version 5.3 (RevMan) software.

Results: Six trials with a total of 680 subjects comparing enteral feeding advancement protocols were identified. The number of days to reach full feeds in rapid enteral feeding was shorter by 2.79 days (95% CI 1.39, 4.19) and time to regain weight by 3.72 days (95% CI 2.86, 4.59) compared to slow enteral feeding. There was no significant difference in the incidence of feeding intolerance (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42, 1.11) and NEC (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.45, 1.72) between the two groups.

Conclusions: Rapid enteral feeding protocols reduce the time to establish full enteral feeds and to regain birth weight in preterm low birth weight neonates. Rapid enteral feeding may facilitate early discharge and help reduce hospital costs for the care of these neonates.

Enteral Nutrition ; Infant, Newborn

Background and Objectives: Epilepsy is a very common pediatric neurologic disorder, and the mainstay of treatment is the use of anti-seizure medication. Several factors may cause inadequate adherence leading to uncontrolled seizures, lower quality of life, and neurodevelopmental consequences. This study aimed to determine medication adherence of adolescents with epilepsy and identify factors that may be associated in medication adherence. Methods: This is a prospective cross-sectional study involving adolescents with epilepsy. A self-reported survey was used to measure adherence. Data on demographics and epilepsy were then assessed for presence of association with adherence. Results: Fifty-one participants were included. Of these, 19.6% were non-adherent, 35.3% had medium adherence, and 45.1% had high adherence. Simple logistic regression analysis showed that unemployed primary caregiver is associated with 7.0 times higher odds of having moderate-high adherence and consuming at least three drugs is associated with 0.3 lower odds of having moderate-high adherence. Conclusion As high as 80.4% of adolescents were adherent to their medications. The presence of a caregiver who can closely monitor the patient is associated with adherence while intake of several drugs is associated with nonadherence. Future studies may need larger sample size and explore knowledge, attitude, and other social factors that may influence medication adherence.
adolescents ; epilepsy