Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effect of the intensified transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) targeting bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on craving reduction in patients with opioid use disorder. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 30 individuals who participated voluntarily at Baharan Camp of Shahid Mahalati. The participants had already completed the detoxification phase and stayed at the camp to resolve their craving and gain occupational skills to reintegrate into the community. The participants were selected using convenience and purposive sampling methods and were then assigned to an experimental group (n = 15) and a control group (n = 15). The experimental group received ten 20-minute tDCS sessions twice a day for 5 consecutive days.There was a 20-minute break between the two stimulations. The DLPFC was stimulated with a current intensity of 2 mA (anode: F3 and cathode: F4). The control group received a sham stimulation. Both groups completed Franken’s Desires for Drug Questionnaire at baseline and after the stimulation sessions. Additionally, they completed the questionnaires once again three months after the end of the treatment to assess treatment retention. Results: At the posttest stage, the intensified tDCS had significant effects on momentary opioid craving reduction in all measured factors, e.g., desire and intention, negative reinforcement, and control (p ＜ 0.001). However, the results concerning treatment retention at the 3-month follow-up stage were insignificant for all factors (p ＜ 0.001). Conclusion Apparently, tDCS can be used as a tool to reduce craving. However, its application as an independent and sustainable treatment remains debatable.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effect of the intensified transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) targeting bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on craving reduction in patients with opioid use disorder. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 30 individuals who participated voluntarily at Baharan Camp of Shahid Mahalati. The participants had already completed the detoxification phase and stayed at the camp to resolve their craving and gain occupational skills to reintegrate into the community. The participants were selected using convenience and purposive sampling methods and were then assigned to an experimental group (n = 15) and a control group (n = 15). The experimental group received ten 20-minute tDCS sessions twice a day for 5 consecutive days.There was a 20-minute break between the two stimulations. The DLPFC was stimulated with a current intensity of 2 mA (anode: F3 and cathode: F4). The control group received a sham stimulation. Both groups completed Franken’s Desires for Drug Questionnaire at baseline and after the stimulation sessions. Additionally, they completed the questionnaires once again three months after the end of the treatment to assess treatment retention. Results: At the posttest stage, the intensified tDCS had significant effects on momentary opioid craving reduction in all measured factors, e.g., desire and intention, negative reinforcement, and control (p ＜ 0.001). However, the results concerning treatment retention at the 3-month follow-up stage were insignificant for all factors (p ＜ 0.001). Conclusion Apparently, tDCS can be used as a tool to reduce craving. However, its application as an independent and sustainable treatment remains debatable.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effect of the intensified transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) targeting bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on craving reduction in patients with opioid use disorder. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 30 individuals who participated voluntarily at Baharan Camp of Shahid Mahalati. The participants had already completed the detoxification phase and stayed at the camp to resolve their craving and gain occupational skills to reintegrate into the community. The participants were selected using convenience and purposive sampling methods and were then assigned to an experimental group (n = 15) and a control group (n = 15). The experimental group received ten 20-minute tDCS sessions twice a day for 5 consecutive days.There was a 20-minute break between the two stimulations. The DLPFC was stimulated with a current intensity of 2 mA (anode: F3 and cathode: F4). The control group received a sham stimulation. Both groups completed Franken’s Desires for Drug Questionnaire at baseline and after the stimulation sessions. Additionally, they completed the questionnaires once again three months after the end of the treatment to assess treatment retention. Results: At the posttest stage, the intensified tDCS had significant effects on momentary opioid craving reduction in all measured factors, e.g., desire and intention, negative reinforcement, and control (p ＜ 0.001). However, the results concerning treatment retention at the 3-month follow-up stage were insignificant for all factors (p ＜ 0.001). Conclusion Apparently, tDCS can be used as a tool to reduce craving. However, its application as an independent and sustainable treatment remains debatable.

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effect of the intensified transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) targeting bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on craving reduction in patients with opioid use disorder. Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted on 30 individuals who participated voluntarily at Baharan Camp of Shahid Mahalati. The participants had already completed the detoxification phase and stayed at the camp to resolve their craving and gain occupational skills to reintegrate into the community. The participants were selected using convenience and purposive sampling methods and were then assigned to an experimental group (n = 15) and a control group (n = 15). The experimental group received ten 20-minute tDCS sessions twice a day for 5 consecutive days.There was a 20-minute break between the two stimulations. The DLPFC was stimulated with a current intensity of 2 mA (anode: F3 and cathode: F4). The control group received a sham stimulation. Both groups completed Franken’s Desires for Drug Questionnaire at baseline and after the stimulation sessions. Additionally, they completed the questionnaires once again three months after the end of the treatment to assess treatment retention. Results: At the posttest stage, the intensified tDCS had significant effects on momentary opioid craving reduction in all measured factors, e.g., desire and intention, negative reinforcement, and control (p ＜ 0.001). However, the results concerning treatment retention at the 3-month follow-up stage were insignificant for all factors (p ＜ 0.001). Conclusion Apparently, tDCS can be used as a tool to reduce craving. However, its application as an independent and sustainable treatment remains debatable.

Objective: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mindfulness practices have been proposed as a potential approach to improve executive functions (EFs) and reduce craving in persons with substance use disorders. Based on the neural mechanisms of action of each of these interventions, the combination of both non-pharmacological interventions might have additive effects. In the current study, the effects of tDCS combined with mindfulness-based substance abuse treatment (MBSAT) to improve EFs and reduce craving were investigated in early abstinent methamphetamine abuse. Methods: Eighty (youths aged between 18 and 21) early-abstinent methamphetamine users were randomly assigned to the research groups (tDCS group [n = 20], mindfulness group [n = 20], combined mindfulness-tDCS group [n =20], and sham group [n = 20]). Active tDCS (1.5 mA,20 min, 12 sessions) or sham tDCS was appliedover the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the MBSAT protocol was used over twelve 50-min sessions. Results: Both in the post-test phase (immediately after the intervention) and follow-up phase (one month after the intervention), performance in most EFs tasks significantly improved in the combination group which received real tDCS ＋ MBSAT, as compared to baseline values and sham stimulation group. Similarly, a significant reduction in craving was observed after intervention inall treatment groups, but not the sham stimulation group. Interestingly, the increase in EFs and the reduction in craving post versus pre tDCS ＋ MBSAT intervention were correlated. Conclusion Findings from the current study provide initial support for the clinical effectiveness of combination tDCS ＋ MBSAT, possibly influencing cognitive/affective processes.